What Is Thoreau's Argument In Civil Disobedience

Improved Essays
Henry David Thoreau illustrates “Civil Disobedience” as an equal and moral man amongst his beloved brothers and sisters on behalf of addressing his government's largest issues. The excerpt alone, however, speaks genuinely and entirely as a true American. In just about every aspect of his speech; with reference to all political, social, and monetary order, Thoreau addresses his opinions and beliefs through his first hand experience, man's utmost basic civil rights as well as internal will to assist the development of a new and moral society. For it is unlike an American man or woman to succumb to a principle in which they have no desire to follow. Let alone a principle that leaves little to no voice to it’s citizens. Subsequently, Thoreau amounts his most reliable and weighted belief within his opening proclamation, “That government is best which governs not at all”.
Conscience is a power even god has asserted himself. Man is a ruler of his own decisions and beliefs, so why has the day come where man is nothing more than a dog on a leash. Much like a sensible dog,
…show more content…
However, as of now that is all he considers it to be. A legislature is nothing without its kin. So how has the day come that the people are unable to dictate the ultimate fate of their lives. In many cases it still remains unseen or overlooked within the very realms of society. For example, men do not fail to be cheated by their neighbors and not have their opinions heard. Therefore, there should be no difference in the relationship between an individual and the State. For there to be civil obedience there must first be a significant amount of mutual respect and trustworthiness within one another. The respect and trust must be made on both sides of the argument. For a government must be truthful and fair to its people while the individuals must adhere and respect the laws placed upon

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In spite of the fact that an improved perspective of "Letter from Birmingham Jail," many read the report principally as a safeguard of the idea of common noncompliance. This approach is absolutely justifiable, considering that Dr. Ruler expands on his idea of the idea in the "Letter." The fundamental commence of common rebellion is that an individual has the duty to challenge the laws of the state when the human law negates certain prevalent standards. Masterminds like Socrates (c. 470-299 B.C.E.), St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), and John Locke (1632-1704) all investigated the relationship between the individual and the state. What developed when of Locke and the Enlightenment was the possibility that the universe had "regular laws" that may frequently come in strife with man-made laws.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Speaks in favor of government that does not intrude upon men’s lives. Some governments show a reason of how successfully men can be imposed on or even impose on themselves, for their own advantage. Thoreau focuses on the U.S citizens, foremost intellectuals in the East and North of the United States. Thoreau’s audience focuses on the U.S citizens because he often writes of the injustice that the government exhibits towards its people. For instance, Thoreau writes, “why does it not encourage its citizens to be on the alert to point out its faults, and do better than it would have on them?”…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau wants the government to not make decision for us but accept the ones people want because the people control the government, not the givernment controling the people. In addition, thoreau uses diction to bring in the passed to persuade the audiance to not letting them take advantage of. Thoreau said, "the American government-what is it but a tradition... but each instant…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues in “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” that the government no longer does what it was created to do; subjects people to follow and support its decisions, without necessarily informing people of their choice; and limits the freedoms people have in society. Thoreau wants to convince his readers to begin thinking and living in the manner he does. His arguments ultimately lead his audience to experience feelings of injustice, and want to become more involved in deciding how they are governed through the use of civil…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also uses imagery in order to persuade the reader of his idea. He also stated that the citizens must be sentient to the laws they obey and disobey. It is up to every man to decide based on his own moral standards and ethics what law he deemed unrespectable; he also accomplishes appealing to human consciousness over logic. Thoreau also writes, "If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself"(Thoreau).It can interpreted to if you don’t believe in what the government is doing as being appropriate, you should disobey that government even if the final consequences is that the government won’t protect your rights…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau’s message is delivered to mankind in order to bring an end to a repressive government and bring the fall to this controversial decision that man is forced to decide upon. Society often tries to propose the solution of this government in a way outside of breaking the law. Thoreau explains that this cannot work by stating, “As for adopting the ways which the State has provided for remedying the evil, I know not of such ways. They take too much time, and a man's life will be gone. I have other affairs to attend to” (2).…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau was speaking to those who want to learn more about his opinion of the best form of government. He knows there are people who agree with him. The tone of the writing is more personal. He is writing to the people but not looking for an actual answer. What he is expecting from this…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, born July 12, 1817 in Concord, Massachusetts, was known to be an American transcendentalist and philosopher. Thoreau became known for the essay he wrote when he spent a night in jail due to his refusal to pay taxes in objection to slavery and the Mexican War. The essay was published and titled “Resistance of Civil Government” but also known as “Civil Disobedience.” It is unsurprising that the government is dirty and corrupt so the purpose of the essay was to influence readers to not fear but protest government laws and commands or vote them out.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is clearly a very strong willed person and does not conform to what the majority does. As any audience member can tell, he is very concerned about the way the government works, but not only that, he is concerned about how intolerant the government is to non-conformity. He believes the government does not have tolerance for those who do not conform to common thought. Thoreau states that many conflicts are created by people not being able to pursue their ideas in certain topics. The conformity that existed bothered Thoreau very much, so he wrote in his essay his thoughts on it.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For this reason, “there are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them” by simply avoiding immoral government support like slavery and the Mexican-American war the power of an individual can bring about a life changing experience. It is extremely important for the reader to understand and acknowledge Thoreau relationship with the government and why individualism is so important. He does not think that all government is bad but “simply wish[es] to refuse allegiance to the state, to withdraw and stand aloof from it effectually” since he strongly believes that “if his soul and conscience was free than he was free”.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through these two images, Thoreau portrays the American government as meddlesome and intrusive. He reveals the American government to be a standing army and pretty much like a wooden gun when it comes to laws and dealing with its people. This infers that the government is sort of revealing its heavy powers to prevent problems occurring among the different countries and its countries. A policy that most people obey and do out of respect for the law is that as known by most drivers; when they are stopped by a police officer, they tend to turn off the engine, roll down the window, stay inside the car, and put their hands on the steering wheel. This law conflicts with the morality because although it is not wrong, yet it is unnecessary and that it is only practiced because it has been adopted by the people over time.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argued against the government making their own decisions based of their own consciences, and not the people’s. Thoreau summarizes this with a quote, “That government is best which governs…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience and Plato’s Allegory of the Cave reveal differences and similarities on their outlook on government and solutions to rid their prospective states of certain problems. These solutions focus on freeing oneself from conforming to societal norms in favor of seeking “enlightenment” and awareness. The aforementioned great minds of their times both argue variations of the same views on human existence and an individual 's role in their respective societies. At their core, these two political philosophies urge humanity to threaten the safety of the status quo; they push man to dare to be skeptics, dare to climb out of the depths of their limited perspectives, dare to question what is true reality…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Essay Civil Disobedience is an essay written by Henry D. Thoreau in 1849. In his essay he uses rhetorical question to engage his audience, and he uses those questions to make a statement how a government should be run. Thoreau is quoted in the paper saying “I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least". Using this argument, Thoreau uses rhetorical questions to prompt the reader into thinking of the idea of rebellion. They are used well in the essay, because they display his pathos, logos, and ethos.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays