Thomas Hobbes State Of Nature

Great Essays
The state of nature refers to human nature, where there is naturally liberty and no external impediment to human behaviour. Hobbes pessimistic portrayal of life in a hypothetical state as “solitary, poore, nasty, brutish and short” hinges on the assumption of self-interested and competitive individualism. He indicates his preference for unadulterated absolutism by an artificially appointed sovereign because by nature, then, our method of knowing the world is solipsistic. His arguments are centred on egoism and self-preservation under the state of nature and how it ultimately leads to a state of war.
Firstly, Hobbes argues that under the state of nature, human beings are egoistic individuals who continually seek to satisfy their desires. There
…show more content…
This ‘inconvenience’ is much preferred as the “perpetual warre of every man against his neighbour, are much worse.” This brings about the emergence of the social contract, where there is either mutual agreement of free individuals under the state of nature to submit themselves to a sovereign or the fear of the power of an existing sovereign. Sovereignty must be unconditional but there is however a contradiction and lack of justification since Hobbes has put forth the argument that there is natural equality of power the state of nature. The ‘first mover’ will only be willing to forgo liberty if others are also willing to do likewise but since Hobbes claims that human beings are egoistic and mistrustful of one another, it is therefore not a rational and viable option under the state of nature. This brings in the need for a second social contract which is the commonwealths by conquest, in which the superior force is used to command obedience to create a new political society. This is illustrative of Oliver Cromwell’s rule where there is de facto authority, in which ‘might makes right’. Hobbes’s theory of obligation states that ‘Covenants without the sword are but words and have no strength to …show more content…
Driven by the fear of divine punishment and the need for self-preservation, it leads human beings into a vicious and violent competition for scarce resources and status, which results in a state of war. Because of the state of nature, Hobbes champions the need for a coercive authority in order to subdue violence and maintain peace and order in the form of a social contract, which encompasses the fact that egoistic individuals need to submit to a sovereign as the sovereign is a tool of their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In that state of nature we respond to others in three different ways. First, competition, which is what we invade to take what another has for ourselves. Second, diffidence, which is when we fear another and have a desire for safety in order to retain what we already have. Lastly, the strife for glory, which is when we worry about appearing significant in another’s eyes. A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, according to Hobbes in order to come out of this nightmarish state that is the state of nature the citizens would be willing to live under any form of authority therefore he advocates for the institution of a covenant and sovereign of power. A covenant is basically a voluntary act of consent where you the citizen are passing on to your sovereign your rights and a sovereign of power is fundamentally an absolute monarchy where there is absolute power for a single person and no one else. Hobbes states that the sovereign's power is indivisible, and he is only liable to god, no anyone else and if you revolt against him you will be going back to the nightmarish state that is the state of nature where everyone is fighting for the ultimate goal of self-preservation (115-116). Hobbes is all for an absolute monarchy thinking that one person with absolute power is better than a government or worse living in the state of nature where there are no laws and you have to fight for survival every…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Leviathan, Hobbes makes a few key assumptions about human behavior in the natural world – namely that all men are equal, desire for what is best for oneself, and have the right to do all things in the preservation and improvement of life – in the “the state of nature”. Upon this, he builds his subtractive…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    9/11 Policy Changes

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes believed that with social contract anyone can have anything such as taking someone’s life or taking away someone’s property which can cause conflict and war. Hobbes claimed that if you cannot have peace then you have to practice for war. According to Hobbes, “From this fundamental law of Nature, by which men are commanded to endeavour peace, is derived this second law, “that a man be willing, when others are so too, as far-forth, as for peace, and defence of himself he shall think it necessary…””. In…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is from this idea that Hobbes argues that the fear of death and bodily harm usher man to seek collective peace. The anarchy of the state of nature is consistent with the continual emotion of fear, fear that someone will steal your property or perhaps enslavement. To relieve this tension and enjoy life with less worry, Hobbes claims that people create a social contract between them and a ruler. According to him, people would essentially give up their power to one ruler who in turn, the ruler would ensure they could live peacefully. The only right left to the people, after they give all their power to a ruler and agree to abide by those laws, is the right to not be killed.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you have an unquenchable and selfish desire for power? According to Thomas Hobbes take on human nature, you do. This view will be examined by asking; Does Hobbes’s account of why life would be so bad in the ‘state of nature’ rest on a false assumption about human nature? Who is Thomas Hobbes will be the first premise for investigation then The ‘state of nature’ as defined by Hobbes will be described then assessed.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes for instance, believing that the state of nature is enviably a state of war explains that society needs a strong government to maintain order, ensuring that people do not lapse into war. This is why he argues for an absolute monarch. Hobbes view is that everyone is born with rights that they relinquish to the monarch in return for safety and protection. This is called the social contract. When people do this, they are essentially giving up their freedom and liberty, surrendering all control to the monarch.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In both Thomas Hobbes Leviathan and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government both describe “the state of nature”. However, for both authors the view point on the “natural instincts” humans possess differs in multiple ways. For Hobbes the state of nature deals with the savagery of Americans, lead to criminal activity and involves two natural passions while Locke’s state of nature involves a state of equality. Both Hobbes and Locke’s explanation of state of nature have aspects of natural law, both authors include ideas of natural law to keep order in the society. For Hobbes the passion of reason causes individuals to look for peace and they therefore develop natural law.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in the State of Nature was describes by Hobbes as being ‘solitary’, ‘poor’, ‘nasty’, ‘brutish’, and ‘short’. Hobbes also believed humans have a natural desire for security and order. And in order to secure self-protection and to avoid misery and pain, societies began entering into contracts. These ideas of self-defense are inherent to human nature and in order to achieve this people would voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms to a Leviathan via contract who would command obedience. This led…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a man in a Hobbesian State of Nature were presented with the choice of whether to enter into a Hobbesian social contract, would it be in his best interest to do so? In this essay, I will summarize the conditions of both the State of Nature and rule by a Hobbesian sovereign as well as present the benefits and detriments of both states of life. Having presented the facts of the choice, it will be evident that the man in the State of Nature should, according to his best interest, agree to the social contract. The State of Nature which the man is in while being faced with his choice must be made clear before it can be compared to any other state of affairs.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The biggest bully becomes the leader of the government and keeps people safer than they would be in the state of nature. The people will stay in line because having the sovereign in control gets them out of the bad state of nature. Simply put, we get scared, and then we want the government to fix it- to make it go away, however, the government needs more power to do so, so we give it to them so we can feel safe. The purpose of government to Hobbes is safety, and the government can do whatever it wants to as long as it keeps people safer than they would be in the state of nature. Hobbes believes that government isn’t limited by anything.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their ideas on the state of nature, Hobbes has a negative view, while Rousseau believes we were better off in the state of nature. The basis for their different ideas on the state of nature contribute to their diverging ideas on their accounts of government by social contract. Hobbes argues for citizens relinquishing their authority to the state, while Rousseau contends for the sovereign authority to be in the hand of the citizens. I will argue that Rousseau makes a more convincing argument because it is one of compromise rather than extremism. Hobbes’ account of government by social contract is based on the basic principle and rational that people give up some of their rights in order to feel secure.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes reduces the state of nature to a list of laws based on the individual’s desire to seek peace, which would conflict with the scenario Hobbes presents. However, one could view the state of nature as an example of collective rationality prescribing individual rationality. In the end, peace may be the goal, but it can only be achieved if others are united in seeking this goal.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays