Kant’s categorical imperative, implies that a person is not allowed to act in a way that they would …show more content…
Larry made use of practical reason, and showed to have a good will. His example, which also becomes universal law, is good. However if Larry doesn’t agree to take the driving seat he would be responsible for letting millions who could have a cure suffer, making it not a good universal law. This is why there is not a simple solution to this moral dilemma, and we must take in consideration the philosophy of Reasonable Moral Pluralism.
Reasonable moral pluralism (RMP) is presented when conflicting and plural values are not the result of selfishness, prejudice, ignorance, bad reasoning, and bias. It is presented when a number of good and important ethical values are inherently incompatible. There are values and principles that require a wide understanding of world facts