Harry Browne's View On Unselfishness

Improved Essays
What evidence does Harry Browne offer in support of the conclusion that “everyone is selfish”?

In order to properly display his thoughts circling around the selfishness that everyone has, Harry Browne uses an example involving different examples of various ways of living. Browne compares a lying thief, a charitable worker, a working-class man, a loving mother, and a career singer, suggesting that they all have one aspect of life in common; they are all doing what they believe what will bring them the most happiness. Browne suggests that it is useless to separate these people based on the stereotypical view on ‘selfishness’ and ‘unselfishness’ because they are all selfish in the sense that they do what they do to bring happiness about themselves.

What evidence or argument does Browne offer in opposition to the claim that “it would be a better world if everyone were unselfish”?
…show more content…
As he mentioned in his essay, no one is a mind reader and can even determine what a person actually wants. Therefore, using time and effort in order to make someone happy when it may not even work is not going to make a person content. Also, the reason I do not disagree with this is because it would not eliminate the idea of continuing to help people and commit unselfish acts. I say this with the idea that helping others brings some people pure joy. However, just because I believe that this would bring about the most happiness does not mean that I believe it is morally right or what the world should do. I believe the world is lacking compassion and that under certain circumstances, not everyone would benefit from pure selfishness (e.g. the homeless). This being said, yes, I believe pure, unadulterated selfishness would bring about the most happiness, but for the sake of those it would not benefit, I do not think this is one that humans act

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There are more cases regarding those whose desires do not coincide with their self-interest and these contradict the theory of psychological egoism. In cases where a psychological egoists would claim that everyone would expect even just a little bit of benefit, does not take into account pessimistic people or people who know that the action will not benefit them at all (Shafer-Landau, 2015). Using sincere love as an example, the claim that our actions are motivated our strongest desire would not hold up because our self-interested desires would not be our priority; rather, you would want the other person to be happy even if it caused you pain (Jorati, 2014). There are times that people go after their own self-interest, however if they did it all the time, there would be no sense of morality. Even Shafer Landau (2015) states “If all we can do is look out for Number One, then there is little point in demanding we do otherwise.” (pg.104).…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also argues that a completely ethical person will not be conflicted about his ethical choice, opposite of Kant, who thinks that a person can make an ethical choice while desiring the wrong alternative. In fact, he prefers that, because it shows that the person is doing his duty, not the action just because it makes him happy. Kant might defend himself by saying that it would be too easy for a person to succumb to selfish desires if he is gaining happiness from his virtuous acts, and any action is not moral if there are any external motivators, but I will show how this defense fails near the end of the paper. Kant and Aristotle have very different opinions on what makes a person virtuous and what defines a virtuous act. My thoughts on morality line up more with Aristotle’s.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This applies to the selfless-selfish spectrem. People who are naturally selfless will not ever think their actions; it comes easily to them and they do not feel they are making an impact while people who are more selfish by nature think they do something selfless. However, it is not that great but it makes them look like a better person. The most selfless acts are kind ones that are not for…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We would not be able to relate with others and their experiences. It is better to have a life with negative and positive emotions, than not at all. If we had a life without emotions or feelings, we would miss out what has worth and is of value. If we lacked emotion, and looked back at a memory we would not feel anything. That memory would hold no value because we do not have an emotion to relate or look back to.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, they do not care about their duties of having good manners or right actions because they choose what is good for them, but it might hurt others. But Elbert Hubbard had said that “responsibility is the price of freedom” (Hubbard). Therefore, having freedom alleviates duties and so does…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To expand upon this idea, the person who spoke over you may have done so without realizing it and doesn’t have any mal intent towards you (although this doesn’t negate the fact that you feel like this wasn’t a just situation). Furthermore, there doesn’t have to be a third-party present who has some sort of authority to say that X speaking over Y was wrong. Basically, injustice doesn’t require an overarching common power or law because it is based on one’s individual perception. And to suggest that injustice can only happen when there is common power and law, suggests that man has the inability to determine what is just…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separateness Of Persons

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Nozick this notion is flawed as “to use a person [for another’s benefit] does not sufficiently respect and take account of the fact that he is a separate person, that his is the only life he has. He does not get some overbalancing good from his sacrifice”. To put more plainly, the theory suggests that sacrificing the life of one person in order to maximise overall utility is still immoral, for that person is an individual in their own right and will not benefit from acting in this way. Utilitarianist’s fail to recognise that we are all separate beings in our own right. Instead it treats being’s as mere ‘repositories of…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in his writing, Hobbes refers to the power-lust of “some”, meaning that not all men lust for power. If this was the case, a state of nature would not result in a state of war. By focusing on the good parts of human nature in those that do not lust for power, the sequence of events may not occur in the way Hobbes claims. If “some” men do not lust for power, they will not be concerned with their status or honor. Therefore, this situation would not result in a state of war.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical egoism varies from other ethical positions since it proposes that the enthusiasm of others anything to never be an element in good choice making. An ethical egoist accepts that helping others is not an ethical activity and that they anything to help other people just seeing that it would offer an advantage over the long haul. If it does not better me I “morally” do not have to do it. So, if killing, torturing, or robbing someone will help me better myself then morally right. The book claims that ethical egoism cannot be true because it requires killing rape, or theft just because actions of this promote self- interest.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith Self Interest

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Being greedy in my opinion, is a concern only for your own wants and needs, where you want more and more of something, without caring that by taking more, someone gets less. Coase successfully debunks this misconception by quoting Smith’s, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, in which Smith states that man does care about the fortunes of others, even though it does not benefit him in any way, (Coase, 1976). Therefore, it cannot be construed that Smith approved of greed, but rather that Smith saw people as they really were; dominated by self-love, yes, but not without concern for others, (Coase, 1976). If you concern for others, you can not take more and…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays