this is where hermeneutics comes into play, without using this principle of understanding law would never come about. Gadamer takes language to be, not some instrument by the means of which we are able to engage in a “world” but instead the very tool for this kind of engagement, and we use text as a way to give that language spoken authority in a “world”.
If I am to respect Gadamer’s philosophies I should also take a look at the horizons that is originalism, a position on thinking how much weight the constitution should hold. This can range from extreme cases to non-extreme, were for extreme originalist view the original way the constitution was presented to be the framework and authority of American law. The position I am trying to express
If I am to respect Gadamer’s philosophies I should also take a look at the horizons that is originalism, a position on thinking how much weight the constitution should hold. This can range from extreme cases to non-extreme, were for extreme originalist view the original way the constitution was presented to be the framework and authority of American law. The position I am trying to express