An example would be the parts played by the woman in the veil and the soldiers in Okri's "In the Shadow of War." When Omovo looks out the window, he comes across a woman who the soldiers are looking for. Later, the soldiers tell Omovo that "[the woman with the veil] is a spy. She helps our enemies" (Okri 11). Further on in the story, Omovo learns that the woman is aiding refugees, or "children with kwashiorkor stomachs and women wearing rags", by providing them with food and other provisions (Okri 12). By offering disagreeing descriptions, the author paints an incredibly vague and enigmatic picture. As pointed out by Robeson, "By the end of the story, readers do not know whether the woman is indeed a spy or simply a humanitarian" (Okri 12). The soldiers in “In the Shadow of War” are similarly contradictory in that they are also showcased in two vastly different ways: the heroes and defenders of justice, yet the oppressors of a beaten down, vulnerable people. The role of the woman in the veil and the soldiers is unknown because they have the capability of becoming both. While opposing in nature, the portrayals offered are simply two sides of one coin. The true role of these characters is determined by the interpretation of the reader, which reflects on the moral behavior during wartime. It is up to individual citizens to decide what is correct and what is incorrect, as well as to deal with the confusion that might ensue. These contradicting characters showcase the mixed and confused opinions on morality present in times of
An example would be the parts played by the woman in the veil and the soldiers in Okri's "In the Shadow of War." When Omovo looks out the window, he comes across a woman who the soldiers are looking for. Later, the soldiers tell Omovo that "[the woman with the veil] is a spy. She helps our enemies" (Okri 11). Further on in the story, Omovo learns that the woman is aiding refugees, or "children with kwashiorkor stomachs and women wearing rags", by providing them with food and other provisions (Okri 12). By offering disagreeing descriptions, the author paints an incredibly vague and enigmatic picture. As pointed out by Robeson, "By the end of the story, readers do not know whether the woman is indeed a spy or simply a humanitarian" (Okri 12). The soldiers in “In the Shadow of War” are similarly contradictory in that they are also showcased in two vastly different ways: the heroes and defenders of justice, yet the oppressors of a beaten down, vulnerable people. The role of the woman in the veil and the soldiers is unknown because they have the capability of becoming both. While opposing in nature, the portrayals offered are simply two sides of one coin. The true role of these characters is determined by the interpretation of the reader, which reflects on the moral behavior during wartime. It is up to individual citizens to decide what is correct and what is incorrect, as well as to deal with the confusion that might ensue. These contradicting characters showcase the mixed and confused opinions on morality present in times of