Explain Kant's Idea Of Borrowing

Decent Essays
Decontee Zinnah
April, 13 2016
PHIL-P100
Daniel Lindquist
Discussion Question Assignment #3: Kant
In Kant’s second example, he talked about a man who believe that borrowing money for other with that intention of not paying is back. In this section kant provide us with example of why he this the idea of borrowing without paying is forbidden. Some of the reason as to why Kant believe that this method is wrong is because of the motive behind it. Before borrowing the money, he already has his plan about not paying it back and stay go ahead to borrow it anyways.This is why Kant believes that borrowing money while intending to not repay it is forbidden.
What does Kant believe is the sources behind the idea of borrowing money knowing fully well

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his second argument, Kant is tempted to create exceptions to the rule against lying because in some instances, the consequences of not lying will be bad and the…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    You are not allowed to make exceptions for yourself. For example, if you expect other people to keep their promises, then you are obligated to keep your own promises. If we apply Kant’s theory in social terms, it emphasizes on the respect for the person because each person has moral dignity. Therefore, no person could exclusively treat another as a means to his/her own end. One must make the right decisions for the right reasons.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantian Moral Theory depends on the whether or not you have fulfilled your duty not on the consequences that put back on one’s self. It is all a matter of the motivation behind an action compared to its consequence. For example, one finds a one-hundred-dollar bill on the street. If he is to think I want to do something…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Universal Law Case Study

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages

    People can not violate the human rights or deprive themselves because people consider helping others is not their business. My conclusion is that Kant has a clear idea of how to question ourselves about this simple actions. To be responsible for our own body, life, welfare, happiness and also to be honest, to be a man of honor, and to help others to succeed in life. At the end of the day, we all are human beings striving to survive and pursuing happiness.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant basically says that man is immature and relies on others do the thinking for him, he says “If I have a book which provides meaning for me, a pastor who has conscience…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant argues in the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals that we have “duties to ourselves” which leads some actions to be wrong; however, these actions do not concern to anyone but ourselves. Giving a loan to oneself and promising to pay it back is such a duty that some might believe in, but other than that most believe there are no duties at all. The action could not be wrong if the only one person directly involved in that action agrees to it. Some might beg to differ from this argument. Kant believes that we have duties to ourselves, and his notion of moral duty is explained so as to encompass the idea of “duty to oneself.”…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sam Kant Case Analysis

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thus, Mr. Kant did not share the intent to deprive as stated from the first element of Md. Code, Crim. Law §…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that people can have moral worth only if they are motivated by morality and from the right intention. I somewhat agree with Kant and it seems to be a legitimate claim to me, because people help poor and needy with the expectation of nothing in return. Kant states that any actions rooted in a concern for one's own good lacks moral worth. Although there are not that many duties that we can do without our desires, I think what Kant says is right for the same reason I mentioned…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant Versus Mill

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If everyone was universally permitted to make a lying promise to lenders, then everyone would know of this policy and promises would no longer exist. Therefore, the conflict with a lying promise in the universal formula is not that it is bad, but rather that it would create a complete contradiction inconsistent to the principle of a promise. Thus, making a lying promise impossible and therefore also immoral under Kantian ethics (84). It is important to be reminded that the universal formula, as a categorical imperative, is binding to everyone so that no one can be more privileged or specialized above anyone…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant has left a large footprint in the philosophical communities. This 17th century philosopher is most famous for the concept of the “Categorical Imperative”. This theory has greatly changed the ways an individual may think about a given situation. To understand the development of this subject, it is important to inspect certain aspects of Kant’s life and to fully understand where it began to unfold. The Path, a novel written by Michael Puett and Christine Gross-Loh, brought to light some situations and implications where Kant’s logic could be tested.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe Kant would endorse a paternalistic view of truth telling to patients because it coincide with his views of universal truth. The traditional paternalistic practice of withholding or restricting information to an patient, would be a violation of Kant's moral concept. Traditional paternalistic would interfere with the patient's liberty, and the medical professional would be treating themselves as ends in themselves. Kant wouldn't omit information from the patient because that would restricting an individual's liberty. Kant's categorical imperative states that it's immoral to treat people solely as a means to an end, and that individuals must be treated as ends in themselves; in this case the patient's liberty would be violated because…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s theory of good will could say we should not base our actions off of what produces the most utility for ourselves in fact we should not even focus on ourselves we should focus on the moral duty that we all have. We could hate doing our moral duties; however, it is our moral duty to complete these…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The categorical imperative idea was introduced by Immanuel Kant in 1785 in his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals book. Before I get into what his categorical imperative is all about, let me tell you how Kant saw morals. Kant believes that there are different motives that pull at our human will making us take different paths or choosing different ways to do things. He then goes more into depth saying that there are two classes of morals, selfish decisions and rational obligations. Unfortunately us being normal human beings most of our morals are more on the selfish side and as long as we choose to indulge in our selfish ways, they are not moral.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays