Existentialism And Free Will

Superior Essays
“The word "freedom" has many other uses -- political freedom being the foremost among these – but the kind of freedom that I am talking about could be exercised even if a person lay encased in chains, or had a gun aimed at his head. It is the freedom of the mind from causal determination, not the freedom from physical constraints or threats of violence.” (Caplan, 2014) Today most of us do not believe in the tactics of free will. According to Meriam Webster dictionary free will is the power of making free choices that are unconstrained by external circumstances or by an agency such as fate of divine will. To those who know and understand the concept of free will still have a tendency to question if free will exist or not. Free will is the basis …show more content…
According The Love of Wisdom existentialism is “a school of philosophy that rose to prominence in the mid- twentieth century, which denies that there is a fixed human nature. This implies that humans are radically free and must define life’s meaning in light of their own goals and desires. “(Cowan and Spiegel, 2009) Existentialism is the belief that our pure existence of being is free and only we can determine how our intentions develop. The main point of existentialism is freedom to be anything we as humans want to be. Free will is a huge part of existentialism just based on the definition alone we know that people require free will in order to determine who we would like to be. In terms of Sartre, “[M]an is nothing else but what he makes of himself”; we are “condemned to be free.” (Cowan and Spiegel, 2009). Sartre believes that life is absurd and we crave our own sense of purposefully meaning to life. Without higher power to provide order we are given the perfect opportunity and provided with the ability to create our own meaning. We are defined by how we act, not by how society expects us to act. Hence where free will comes into play. We become our choices, and take full responsibility for any and everything we do. There is no being an existential person if one can’t have the freedom of free will to choose whom they would like to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    With this famous expression, Rousseau asserts that modern states repress the physical freedom that is our birthright and do very little to secure our civil freedom. It should be stated that there’s a difference between natural and civil liberty: natural liberty is the freedom to pursue one’s own desires whereas civil liberty is the freedom to pursue the general will. In Rousseau’s Social Contract, the general will is an important concept and it is defined as the will of the people as a whole. It cannot be transmitted and it is always right. To put the general will in context, human beings would act according to the general will if we were not depraved by society.…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Determinism is an opposed of freewill, in which every action is prearranged by past. The problem with this policy is that no one could be blame for their action whether it’s good or bad-since everything is prearranged. Determinism falls into two further categories: hard determinism and soft determinism. It also means that freewill is predetermine too. Unlike determinism freewill is a very important factor for taking concern, which can create a dilemma in society to punish or praise anyone for his or her actions.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only place that it really runs into an issue would be the topic of a God planned destiny for us, then we get into the debacle of if this is true do we really have free will. So it is better to assume go entertain the idea of no God because Sartre’s idea brings forth an interesting idea that we are responsible for ourselves and which is a form of true freedom than being forced to accept a predefined essence that our creation was built on. (Example of this is, is a pen being forever defined as a pen never having the freedom to define itself, just being the “cookie cutter” concept of a pen, ever pen having the same end goal of writing, an restricting brand(ethic) system,…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We are left alone, without excuse. This is what I mean when I say that man is condemned to be free” (Sartre 32). Because man is not determined by any preordained conceptions of human nature or god, he has absolute freedom and free will. He is to shape his life in whichever way he chooses to do so. However, Sartre takes the Kantian approach (Immanuel Kant) by agreeing that “freedom is a will both to itself and to the freedom of others.” This highlights the idea that a fundamental conception of human existence is freedom.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Freedom of the will, according to Frankfurt, is compatible with determinism; however, his inability to refute the possibility that second order desires may be predetermined allows for the conclusion that all humans truly do not possess freedom of the will and are only under the illusion that they do. In order to fully understand free will, it is important to define it. Free will is determined as the ability to choose between many options and act upon the choice chosen.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sartre accepts that “Far from being able to modify our situation at our whim, we seem to be unable to change ourselves. I am not "free" either to escape the lot of my class, of my nation, of my family” (Sartre, 2003, p. 503). Sartre argues that one is free due to one's constant ability to choose our projects in life and we are free to place the meaning we wish to these situations. Sartre's idea of freedom differs from the traditional understanding, and this is especially clear when we consider the Prisoner (Sartre, 2003, p.505). The traditional understanding of freedom revolves around the idea of one's ability to act, to reach one's aims.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Indeterminism

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is the nature of freedom? Or a better question should be, what is free will and do we have it? The definition of free will is not a simple answer. Free will tries to account for our introspective belief that we have control of our actions and as a result, our own destiny. Nothing in our lives is predetermined and every cause has an effect.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Control is out of this world. “Compatibilism is the thesis that we are both determined and yet at the same time have the sort of freedom necessary to be morally responsible for our actions” (McKenna). Everybody has their own viewpoints on free will and hard determinism. It is often said that it can only be one or the other. The economy, the laws, and the people are only doing what is set in stone for them to be doing, or making their own choices in life.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compatibilism holds that human behavior is both caused and determined and voluntary behavior is nonetheless free to the extent that it is not outwardly expressed; however, Libertarianism, on the other hand, implies that all of our choices are free from any sort of deterministic theories or forces. Compatibilism is suited best for explaining free will as it acknowledges man as a free moral agent while being restrained by the doctrine of total depravity; Libertarianism takes upon itself to rely on concepts that tend to juxtapose one another, such as Open Theism, in order to rationalize free will. Compatibilism, as mentioned previously, is the view that causal determinism is true, but mankind still acts freely, being morally responsible agents…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These actions are made freely because they are determined by the person’s self-forming action which was determined by a choice that was also made freely. All in all, a person can have free will whether or not their actions are previously determined because they form their self-forming actions. When we discuss who is right and who is wrong, we can say that Strawson made a great point, but Kane made a better one. In Strawson’s argument he claims that all of our choices are predetermined by factors we cannot control; he then goes on to conclude that because of these factors, we do not have free will. Similarly, Kane claims that some of our choices are predetermined but are still made freely.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays