Instead of trying to talk to Edgar first about the letter he instantly assumes it was Edgar’s “very opinion in letter! Abhorred villain! . . . . I’ll apprehend him. Abominable villain!” (1.2.75-78). Consequently, Gloucester fails to realize that Edmund is the evil son and Edgar is the one who genuinely loves and cares for him. The theme of blindness is supported once again when they “pluck out his eyes” (3.7.5). Blindness is usually related to being physically blinded and this horrific event defines just that. Due to being visually impaired he gains insight. He now understands how immoral Edmund really is and that Edgar is a really noble son. “I have no way, and therefore want no eyes; I stumbled when I saw.” (4.1.21-22) is a line full of irony because he was mentally blind when he could physically see but mentally saw when he was physically blinded. In comparison the theme of blindness is also portrayed through
Instead of trying to talk to Edgar first about the letter he instantly assumes it was Edgar’s “very opinion in letter! Abhorred villain! . . . . I’ll apprehend him. Abominable villain!” (1.2.75-78). Consequently, Gloucester fails to realize that Edmund is the evil son and Edgar is the one who genuinely loves and cares for him. The theme of blindness is supported once again when they “pluck out his eyes” (3.7.5). Blindness is usually related to being physically blinded and this horrific event defines just that. Due to being visually impaired he gains insight. He now understands how immoral Edmund really is and that Edgar is a really noble son. “I have no way, and therefore want no eyes; I stumbled when I saw.” (4.1.21-22) is a line full of irony because he was mentally blind when he could physically see but mentally saw when he was physically blinded. In comparison the theme of blindness is also portrayed through