Ethical Issues At Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Improved Essays
Because of the accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, the Fukushima group evacuation test, the decontamination cost of the Nihon Matsu Golf Course, the Fukushima nuclear power plant litigation caused the Tokyo Electric Power shareholder suit. There are various reasons for these lawsuits ("Litigation Movement"). For example, it is necessary to protect children from radiation, to receive compensation from TEPCO, to ask the responsibility of TEPCO's Board of Directors to keep safety of nuclear power plants, to pursue the government's responsibility promoting nuclear policy. Some condemnations are related to the denuclearization movement, others are pursuing purely compensation for financial damage. Also, approximately 3,900 people have class lawsuits against the country and TEPCO to return the radiation dose to the pre-accident level and seek consolation fees. These citizen groups are participating not only from …show more content…
“… there will be many thousands of people outside the doors with the power to amp up the political pressure significantly—with heightened boycotts, court cases, and more militant direct action should real progress fail to materialize" (Klein 355). Three months after Fukushima nuclear power explosion, thousands of anti-nuclear protesters marched in Fukushima. Company workers, students, and parents gathered. As of June 2011, more than 80% of Japanese are anti-nuclear, and it is said to be information on the government’s distrust of radiation (Blair). Local governments are skeptical that adequate safety measures have been taken and neglect to grant permission required by the law to bring the shutdown reactors back online. Although the number of anti-nuclear demonstration has decreased compared with that immediately after nuclear accident, demonstrations are still being carried out in areas with nuclear power plants such as Fukushima and Kagoshima

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people who live in Richmond don’t want to agree on constructing a nuclear power plant because of they are frightened that it’s going to explode and cause a lot of damage. In March 1979, an accident occur in The Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania which allowed a small leakage of radiation surround the atmosphere. Many people would fear that it can harm their health, but in Document A it states that “the leak had no demonstrable effect on the health of anyone at the plant or in the surrounding area.” In other words, the small leakage didn't put anyones health and the environments’ in danger. By this, we know that building a nuclear power has more pros than cons, and that there is nothing to worry about.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Left In The Dust Summary

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear energy has been increasingly discussed as an alternative to fossil fuels because we already have most of the infrastructure in place, it is relatively safe when compared to other fossil fuels, and the fuel source is readily available. However, many people are more hesitant when it comes to nuclear, from seeing it as a temporary fix, to a horrible idea that should never happen. In this article ‘Left in the Dust: Uranium’s Legacy and Victims of Mill Tailings Exposure in Monticello, Utah,” by Stephanie Malin and Peggy Petrzelka, they explored some of the reasons that many are apprehensive towards the development of nuclear energy, specifically with the health impacts and environmental injustices made evident to the surrounding rural communities.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Three Mile Island Failure

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The commission also cited a need for agency-accredited training institutions for nuclear plant operators and immediate supervisors of operations” (CITATION). The impact on the nuclear industry was profound. In general, the attitudes of citizens in the United States and around the world shifted in regards to nuclear energy. There were more protests against nuclear power. According to the IAEA, “In 1979, the total capacity of nuclear power plants on order worldwide actually decreased by about 8000 MW(e); eight new plants were ordered but 14 previous orders were cancelled, and in subsequent years, US utilities continued to cancel orders they had already placed” (CITATION).…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On March 11, 2011 at 2:46 pm, an Earthquake with a magnitude of 9.0 struck causing tremendous damage to the northern section of Japan. This earthquake that happened in the ocean triggered a series of giant tsunami waves to also strike the northern section. Japan's northern coast lays on the Pacific Ocean, which is greatly known for its tsunamis and its earthquakes. The plant at Fukushima first opened in 1971 and consists of six separate boiling water reactors. It was one of the fifteen largest nuclear power plants in the world and was the only plant at the time to be designed and constructed by General Electric.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On 11 March 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and resulting tsunami occurred off the east coast of Japan. The tsunami resulted in extensive flooding along the east coast of Japan. Located near the towns of Ōkuma and Futaba on the east coast of Japan the Tokyo Electronic Power Company’s (TEPCO) Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) sustained substantial damage. The FDNPP consists of six individual nuclear power reactors.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear power, which generates a fifth of our nation 's energy supply, has been around since the early 1940’s (NEI). While there are conflicting opinions on this topic, thorough analysis through the historical and ethical lenses justify its uses. Nuclear power is morally acceptable and has a long positive historical record. The benefits of nuclear power outweigh its risks, and the public should view this as a viable future energy source. Nuclear began to fully emerge into modern society as of the 1950’s with the first power plant being built in Pennsylvania in 1954 (Lehr).…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    "It is truly a manmade disaster in which money and power were put ahead of the lives and health of the people of Japan" a nuclear expert said. " The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has been accused of falsifying data and covering up safety risks" (Biggs & Humber, 2011; Collins). When the disaster happened, the information from TEPCO and the Japanese government were ambiguous and misleading, which strengthened the accidents psychosocial effects around the world. TEPCO's President, Hirose said that although the situation facing Fukushima Daiichi on 11 March was exceptional, measures could have been adopted in advance that might have mitigated the impact of the disaster.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Now they have to find out how will this affect life in the ocean, and how to save it. Since Fukushima dumped the radiation in the ocean scientists have done many comprehensive studies on the marine life. Through these studies they found that many of the seals and shellfish are suffering from blood cancer. Infact since japan's plant spilled the radiation the amount of marine animals with blood cancer has doubled.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apart from that, this research highlight the consequences radioactive substance leak to the extent of how it triggered mass panic across different strata of the communities. The attention of this essay will then shift to the attitudes and actions demonstrated by the Japanese’s government, the public, the media, as well as the survivors. Specifically, the measures carried out by the authorities and the locals in overcoming the tragedy and accepting the losses, observed through the lenses of the domestic and international audiences; as well as public doubts of the people directed to the government and the company, TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Company). For the government’s and TEPCO’s control over Fukushima’s nuclear leaks and due to the absence of conclusion in relation to human health from the prolonged exposure to low-level radiation (Sugimoto, 2012; Shigemura,…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Controversy

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Developing countries and rising powers are using nuclear powers as their source of energy to provide for their expanding economics. (Nuclear Energy) Fear has run through the hearts of many Americans with the idea of a terrorist attack on nuclear power plants. Ever since the attack on New York’s Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, the vulnerable of the nuclear facilities have scared many Americans citizens. If an attack on reactors and facilities were to happen, the results would be end up being much worse than Chernobyl.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nuclear power and Japan is just one of the many articles that want nuclear power shut down and never touched again. Nuclear power is a fairly simple and easy way to help the economy they use rods of uranium and heat them up by using nuclear fission (Two atoms coming together). When the rods get warmed up to a certain temperature the water surrounding the nuclear rods create steam, which turns a big turbine and creates electricity without creating carbon emissions. People shut down nuclear power, without even knowing how the energy can improve our well being and is created, is one of the problems that nuclear power is facing. It's not the people hating nuclear energy…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This contrasts to coal fired units which emit copious amounts of substances that aren’t immediately deadly, and didn’t require immediate attention when they were first created thus leading to the environmental state we’re currently in. even though it’s true that nuclear fallout can be a serious problem, many reactors have several containment precautions. Even the incident at Three Mile Island which scared a nation into halting production of nuclear energy was mostly contained, and there have been no identifiable negative health effects [9]. Even considering the amount of current deaths because of both nuclear and fossil fuels, studies show that the amount of energy being produced by nuclear power instead of fossil fuels has actually saved tens of thousands of lives. The study estimated that for each terawatt hour of electricity produced, an average of 26.67 lives are lost whereas a terawatt hour of nuclear electricity kills an average of 0.074 people (stats relevant for Europe)…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Engineers hold the responsibilities to not only innovate new ideas but to do them safely to reduce the chance of error to a small percentage and them some. Engineers must keep in mind the well being of the workers and public who may reside nearby the engineer must be ethical and must follow the laws and use his skills to do things both efficiently and safely. Many of these factors were disregarded in the design, construction and operation of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. The engineers who designed the RMBK-1000 were more concerned with cost and the production of more energy and they neglected safety. They violated Ontario’s code of ethics of a professional engineer and in doings so endangered many lives.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They call themselves anti-nuclear activists, and most stand in firm resolution that nuclear power is not safe for the environment, humans, animals, or even plants. According to author of “Nuclear Power is Not The Answer” Helen Caldicott, It isn’t safe for workers, miners, or residents who work or live in the vicinity of nuclear power plants. She says that the exposure causes the increased risk of cancer, and other diseases. The results of switching to Nuclear Power would be catastrophic because in order for nuclear power to operate, it needs to release more radioactive materials into the air, water, and soil.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was the biggest nuclear disaster since Chernobyl, and nothing could have been done to prevent it, as there is no stopping nature. Then, in any extreme natural event, there is a risk of damage to a plant 's structure or contents, which could easily result in a release of contaminants. Nuclear energy has immense power, and it 's not surprising that that power can be harvested in a detrimental way. There is no remedy for the effects of radiation, which can cause cancer, genetic mutations, and a drastically shorter life expectancy. Given this, nuclear power plants are a prime target for acts of terrorism.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays