Essay On Supreme Court Decisions

Improved Essays
The operations of the court are not as complex as Congress even though it has it’s own peculiarity. Depending on the issue the Court has to decide on, it has a potential to further complicate or extend the entire policy process. However, it The Supreme Court decisions seems to more often than not settle cases that has been contentious for extended periods.
The article about chief Justice Robert’s decision I thought I would like but the use of English is quite technical, I find myself having to pause to understand sentences a lot which sometimes truncates the flow of thought even if it helps to understand what is written. It also has a lot on methods which I wish I had a good handle of. While, I believe it is an interesting read overall, it has a lot going on simultaneously at an advanced academic level. It is good for PhD students to see articles written with this style. However, I wonder if I would want to emulate such writing style,
…show more content…
It used case study in breaking down the detail of how each Justice decided in a case. At the same time effectively, explaining the process and procedures in the Supreme Court. It also shows how and why the Justices are strategic and may sometimes decide and support a position less stringent than they actually want. This is sometimes for the better good of the people or the possible precedent they may set. Furthermore, it demonstrates the interplay of the Supreme Court and the other branches of government which helps to deepen the understanding of the entire policy process. The book talk about the theory of Justices as “policy seekers” which makes sense in a way but another look at the way the court works makes me not to fully support the theory. Since, the Courts have to wait for cases to be presented to them by the right parties and they have to select out of the multitude of cases they have. Also, the Justices are not term limited and would be motivated to produce good

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He believes some members of the senate take part in influencing the Supreme Court decisions in their favour or something which in the long run has the voice of who is elected as a judge or a nominee to the Supreme Court. This has seen judges who are faithful to the constitution miss the various seats they are contending from the electoral processes. The book cites very many vices done by the judiciary but limits itself when it comes to suggestions of scrapping of the judicial system. None of the critics either suggests that the Supreme Court review should be terminated.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glossip Vs Midazolam

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many ways, the Supreme Court acts as both moral and legal arbiter of the nation. Supreme Court decisions all have the potential to have a tremendous impact on the lives of Americans. Some decisions have transformed American society. On April 29, 2015, the Supreme Court Case of Glossip v. Gross was argued.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Court Case Review Throughout the years the United States government has been faced with several discussions. Some of these have become very important throughout history and have left a significate impact on society. These cases range from birth control privacy rights to equality. Among these cases are Griswold V. Connecticut, Baze V. Rees, and Brown V. Board of Education.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury vs. Madison is one of the most significant cases in history. This case is cogent because it is the aboriginal archetype of the Supreme Court appliance judicial review analysis to account an accouterment of federal law as getting invalid. This accommodation set into abode the article of judicial review. During the 1800s, the Supreme Court accept dealt with abounding abundant cases in American society. During this time John Marshall served as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Advantages

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As analyzed in Dynamic Constitution, the reality of the Supreme Court is that it simply finds the law and applies it, without the justices allowing their own views to come into play (Fallon). “The 1st amendment’s equal protection…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison Supreme Court case, Chief Justice John Marshall’s majority decision revolutionized the interpretation of Section 1 according, Section 2 of Article 3 in the US Constitution. Marshall first stated in his speech that “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” This reveals that Marshall believes the Supreme Court’s duty or job is to determine what the law is. He then says that “if two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each… if a law be in opposition to the Constitution...…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It established the Supreme Court’s power and legitimacy as a co-equal branch of government (McBride) and shed light on the importance of judicial…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard of the phrase “supreme court”? Well, in the judicial branch of the United States government, the phrase is an everyday thing for them. This is because they work in law and, more specifically, the supreme justices of court. Basically, it’s their job to serve up justice. This type of thing, was what Thurgood Marshall ended up doing for a living.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In most cases, the Supreme Court should have the final voice. Moreover, Supreme Court judges might not always come from privileged backgrounds, but they are almost always over-qualified for the position, and most have served as federal judges. Hudson points to a controversial case in the book, such as the one involving abortion and Texas. The was a case for the state of Texas’ Supreme Court, rather the Supreme Court of the United States. Hudson’s proposal would only overburden the Congress, which already has a lot on its plate.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Restraint Essay

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As we know about the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, coming from varied religious and ethnic backgrounds with six males and three females. Presidents nominate Justices for life tenure and they must be confirmed by majority vote of the Senate. According to NY Times article that has the title” Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide”, on June 27th, the US Supreme Court decided 5-4 that same-sex couples have a ‘fundamental’ right to marry, and thus overturned the laws of at least 17 states. In this assignment, I will discuss the arguments both for and against judicial activism vs. judicial restraint, using the 2015 gay marriage case of OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since the Supreme Court's inception, there has been considerable debate on its proper role in government. This discourse includes disagreements over the proper role of courts in comparison to legislatures, as well as significant dispute on the degree of rigidity necessary when interpreting the language of the Constitution. From this discourse, two opposing schools of thought have formed: proponents of judicial activism and the implicit ideal of loose constructionism against proponents of judicial restraint and the implicit ideal of strict constructionism. Judicial activism and the "living constitution" interpretation are often criticized for being undemocratic.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays