 # Essay On Infinity Pom

Great Essays
The Infinity POM

By: Vinayak Prathikanti, Varun Popli, & Alan Xiao

For the second month, we had the Infinity POM, and it definitely made us think a little. The problem said to consider all of the infinite numbers between 0 and 1, then all of the numbers on the number line. Which one of these is the larger infinity? Now before we say anything else, we want to tell you that this is an extremely open ended problem, and that it is very hard to argue one side. While this is true, we want to try to cover all of the ways that you could think about it, then express our own opinion at the end. Just to clarify, when we say “which infinity is bigger” we mean “which infinity contains more numbers”. Now, we’re big fans of solving math
Then, think of all of the integers from 0 to positive and negative infinity, so no 2.125 or 55.2329879. This is a different number line/situation than the problem, but we think that it will give you a better understanding of infinity and also support our opinion better. I’m going to show you how we can use the 1-1 correspondence to explain which infinity is bigger in this situation, if any. But how can we assign numbers to numbers if we can’t start at a number for both infinities? For example, we can assign the number 1 to 0.1, but that would neglect the infinite amount of numbers smaller than 0.1, and on top of that you could only stop at the integer 10 after you assign it to 1.0, neglecting the infinite integers larger than 10, and we can’t have that! So here’s what we can do: Assign 1 to 1, add 1 to the integer side and divide 1 by the number on the integer side. It sounds confusing at first, but it’s very simple in numbers: The next step after 1 to 1 would be 2 to ½, then 3 to ⅓ then 4 to ¼, and so on! By doing this, we can prove that it is possible to assign every integer to a fraction. Now if we weren’t “thinkers” we would stop there, say “Alright, since we can assign every integer to a fraction, these 2 infinities are equal”, and be done. But since we are thinkers, we say, “But wait, there’s …show more content…
First off, it is impossible to assign a variable to a group of number that is infinite and keep going on forever. With that in mind, it would be impossible to count how big the whole line is because we could not count those variables because they represent and incorrect amount of number between 0 and 1, so our first solution is false. For our second solution, we can render that false as well because that one to one correspondence cannot keep going on forever, as we cannot count that far. Also, as we stated in that section, we know that we cannot perform that one to one correspondence on the infinite fractions in between 0 and 1. With all these in mind, we came to the conclusion that both of the infinites are equal.

Conclusion In the end, we can make a case for all possible infinities that are greater, but personally we believe that they are equivalent. There are always so many other ways to prove any of these cases, but for us, it all comes down to logic, like we said earlier. Infinity is a concept, an idea, not a countable number, so we can surmise that they are

## Related Documents

• Improved Essays

Thirdly this answer is divided by 2, which can be shown as n2 and then lastly subtracting by 10. 2 This confused me a little between deciding between answer C and D, but after careful accessing of the answers I could see that answer D was subtracting only the sum of n2, where as it was needing to show the whole sum so far subtracted by 10. Which gave me the confidence in answer C being correct. Mathematics used: Algebra, multiplication (superscript form), division, subtraction and…

• 1913 Words
• 8 Pages
Improved Essays
• Improved Essays

In addition to these said numbers, great importance was also give to even number rather than odd numbers. It could be said that even and odd number represent limited and unlimited, with even being unlimited and odd being limited. This was said because Pythagoras believed that an even number could be divided by two before reaching one which was considered the…

• 711 Words
• 3 Pages
Improved Essays
• Improved Essays

Abstract— This article will briefly discuss the evolution of zero throughout history starting from ancient Mesopotamian mathematics to modern day mathematics. Understanding the concept of zero and learning to work with it is the basis of our world today. If zero did not exist then we would not have calculus, financial accounting, and the ability to make simple arithmetic calculations. The idea of zero has crossed the imagination of great minds across the globe. Zero functions as a placeholder and the amount of zeroes after a digit can drastically change the value of the number just imagine if one adds or even removes a zero from their salary.…

• 2496 Words
• 10 Pages
Improved Essays
• Improved Essays

This Goal driven reasoning seems to have been birthed out of utilitarianism, what’s god for all is the undercurrent. So it does work well with a standard that is single but when we get outside of that problems emerge. (Lovin pg.24) As with any form of singular ethical reasoning, problems do exist in teleology. We are ok with only this view if we adopt a single standard, however humanity is more diverse today than ever before, so for many, this does pose the problem of a round hole and a square peg. What is the greatest happiness for one person may not be happiness at all for another person with differences like background, parental guidance and so forth.…

• 1806 Words
• 8 Pages
Improved Essays
• Improved Essays

Everyone 's mind works different. That is why some people are better at math than english and vise versa. That is one problem with utopias. For a utopia to form everyone has to be in agreement on what is the best way to live. However, the definition of an utopia is open for interpretation.…

• 1393 Words
• 6 Pages
Improved Essays
• Improved Essays

If they just memorizes the formula, they will be able to perform the math problem correctly, but they will not understand the process as well as they could have. However, if you breakdown the formula and explain why it works, they will remember it better and be able to apply parts of it to different scenarios and possible use it to explain more complicated formulas. They will gain more from understanding…

• 862 Words
• 4 Pages
Improved Essays
• Superior Essays

This is called the likelihood ratio approach. We can also include a loss function (ʎ), which can manipulate our decision with respect to the consequence of the error as presented in equation 2. The maximum likelihood is an easy approach to compute but will only work for 2 category case i.e. Dichotomizer. For more than two categories, we have to use a different method, for example discriminant functions, which can be expanded for any numbers of categories.…

• 1922 Words
• 8 Pages
Superior Essays
• Great Essays

He concludes by saying one might have the idea of an infinite number or number line but it is merely an idea since no such number exists. In Descartes’ response, he takes a very defensive, stubborn approach that in my opinion, discredits what he has to say. Descartes’ argues that as he has…

• 1447 Words
• 6 Pages
Great Essays
• Improved Essays

In math, completing the square only works with quadratic functions, otherwise the equation will not be able to solve. An important rule to understand when deriving the quadratic formula by completing the square, is that the leading term must equal to “1”. On the other hand, if the leading term does not equal to “1”, one will have to factor the equation by dividing each term by the leading term. The quadratic equation must start as the following: 〖ax〗^2+bx+c=0. Next, the constant number is to be moved to the other side of the equation.…

• 1468 Words
• 6 Pages
Improved Essays
• Improved Essays

Consider, as an example, the following subset of an unknown larger set: {2, 3, 5}. Any scholar with an eye for mathematics will immediately recognize these as the first three prime numbers. However, to conclude that the larger set is then the set of all prime numbers would be ludicrous. The observation of only one further item may easily disprove the conclusion. If, for example, the number 1 (a non-prime) is also observed to be part of the set, one may recognize the pattern {1, 2, 3, 5} as part of the Fibonacci sequence, and might instead conclude that the larger set is, in fact, the set of all elements in the Fibonacci sequence.…

• 836 Words
• 4 Pages
Improved Essays