Ernest Drucker's Addiction Is A Brain Disease

“Addiction a Brain Disease or Excuse”
The article “Addiction Is a Brain Disease” by Ernest Drucker attempts to inform readers on the addictive property of “brain disease”. Drucker’s essay begins by describing the origin of the word ‘addiction’. He also includes the cycles of addiction and the relapse and withdrawal that drug users endure. A solid focus is directed towards the phases that drug user’s experience, but he provides modest details on how it is believed to be a brain disease. In the article, Drucker lacks the necessary information about the effects on the brain that causes these addictions, and he is lacking in that part of the subject.
Drucker does not provide any further sources to support his terminology or discoveries. For example, he does not present how the brain plays a role in brain diseases or what causes these reactions. Drucker works with these types of findings and researches on a daily basis, which makes him seem exceptionally credible. Nevertheless, he is aware of these findings and that they may possibly be factual, it would greatly benefit him to provide the reader with cited facts. Without it, his essay is less convincing because he is missing …show more content…
It would have improved his writing if additional resources were implied instead of just relying heavily on his own views. A great deal of drug addiction is being spoken about, but the author does not include additional addictions. It would greatly improve his essay if he included variety to it. The readers would be uninterested about his continuing story of drug addiction, but, will be thrilled to acquire new information about how other addictions play a role in this brain disease. Although decent points are constructed, they were not compelling enough to support his claims. Many questions are left unanswered, such as who discovered these findings, when where they discovered and could his claims be