Cult leadership suggests that the leader is seen as infallible and any action against him is a subject to punishment. Enron leadership had a self-schema reflecting a propensity toward authorization control (Murphy & Ensher, 2008). Managers who either questioned the organization’s accounting practices or raised their concerns at meetings never had a clear answers and were always left with uncertainty. In most cases, they experienced revenge by the top managers as their staff was removed from beneath them and reassigned to other units (Swartz & Watkins, 2004). The cultic dynamic was also shown when Enron’s leadership was protecting their top management from criticism inside and outside the organization. For example, the movie shows how a 2001 meeting was made to convince workers about the future, Ken Lay proclaimed his trust in Andy Fastow, despite the fact that Andy lost almost a billion dollars mismanaging some partnerships. Most of the top leaders were similarly insulated from the consequences of their actions (Murphy & Ensher,
Cult leadership suggests that the leader is seen as infallible and any action against him is a subject to punishment. Enron leadership had a self-schema reflecting a propensity toward authorization control (Murphy & Ensher, 2008). Managers who either questioned the organization’s accounting practices or raised their concerns at meetings never had a clear answers and were always left with uncertainty. In most cases, they experienced revenge by the top managers as their staff was removed from beneath them and reassigned to other units (Swartz & Watkins, 2004). The cultic dynamic was also shown when Enron’s leadership was protecting their top management from criticism inside and outside the organization. For example, the movie shows how a 2001 meeting was made to convince workers about the future, Ken Lay proclaimed his trust in Andy Fastow, despite the fact that Andy lost almost a billion dollars mismanaging some partnerships. Most of the top leaders were similarly insulated from the consequences of their actions (Murphy & Ensher,