Why Is Tax Fatty Food Affect The Poor?

Improved Essays
Imagine buying a bag of chips for $1.50 and then going back the next day and they are $1.70. Taxing fatty foods has been a huge topic lately with in lots of people. While some people believe it is an unfair decision to the poor, taxing fatty foods can be great because it would decrease the amount of deaths due to obesity, and also decrease the amount of people with diabetes and high blood pressure.
Even though taxing fatty foods could make the people healthier it could also affect the poor in many ways. If the price of unhealthy and fatty foods go up by 20% then the poor are no longer going to be able to provide for themselves because the product that they were buying is now going to be too expensive for them(Blanding). Yes, the poor are not
…show more content…
Taxing sugary and fatty foods will only persuade obese people to try harder to get the unhealthy things that they want(Archer). However, it may encourage obese people to stop eating unhealthy things. Being that healthy products and unhealthy products are the same price people decide to choose to tastier and unhealthy product just because of the taste. For example, a bag of apples could be $2.50 and so are a bag of candy, so of course the bag of candy is chosen over the apples. Another article mentioned that obesity has taken over smoking as the leading cause of premature deaths and illness in Australia(Bond). In the case of the premature babies dying because of their parents being obese, tax on fatty foods should be looked at deeply. For instance, the government will continue to make obesity a serious cause because of the deaths of the premature kids due to the parents lack of care for their health. Supporters say doctors are trying to figure out if its the carbs or the actual food fattening that is causing the amount of obesity(Trend to fat taxes, but unlikely in NZ). Foods that have such things like “Low Carbs” are healthier for the human body because they simply don’t have lots of carbs as other foods. Although the carbs or the fattening of foods could be the cause of obesity, the people who are careless and just don 't care if they eat something healthy or unhealthy are the reason for …show more content…
“I don 't think using the New Zealand tax system to subsidise brussels sprouts by 20 per cent will make people eat more of them, or any vegetable for that matter” (Johnston). Just because the price of sugary foods are going to increase doesn 't mean that anyone is going to stop eating them. Some people that really enjoy eating snacks or junk foods are going to continue to purchase them no matter what the circumstances are. This action is going to push and persuade obese people to try harder to receive the things that they want. Putting 20 percent more tax on fatty and sugary foods will not help the deaths of obese people it will only cause them to spend more money on the things that they want(Archer). Making the healthier foods cheap will not encourage obese people to want or even think about purchasing them. In other words, it 's also unfair to the people that are not obese. No matter if the tax on sugary foods go up and vegtables go down obesity will increase because people will begin to eat LARGE amounts of vegetables and that itself is not health(Archer). Taxing unhealthy foods may seem like a good idea until people start eating LARGE amounts of the “healthy” foods and begin to not be as healthy as expected. Taxing isn 't such of a good idea. Some people will be hurt by it and some people may benefit off of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Poverty And Obesity

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to Roland Sturm, a senior economist, states “Lowering the costs of healthy foods in supermarkets not only increases the amount of fruits, vegetables and whole grains that people eat, but it also seems to reduce their consumption of less nutritionally desirable foods”. If supermarkets just lower their expenses in fresh vegetables and healthier foods, people would turn to these, instead of food that does not give them the right amount of nutrients that their body needs. This can help the obesity rates to…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fast food only creates problems for people and eating healthier can eliminate those problems. Fast food may seem cheap, but eating healthier can be cheap too if one studies up, looks for deals, and shops smart. Americans can break this fast food craze and jump on the healthy bandwagon. It’s much easier than they think, but eating fast food hinders that. Americans know the consequences of this food, they should not ever eat it and they should focus more on consuming healthier…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Snack foods are hard to categorize accurately and it might point consumers to the incorrect solution. The other category food tax that has been already implemented by different countries is the sugar-sweetened beverage which is a massive contributor to the obesity epidemic. These types of beverages have increased the amount of calorie intake of adults and adolescents substantially. The reduction of the intake of these drinks would help reduce obesity as well as other health problems. A small beverage tax would also give the government a substantial amount of revenue that would increase over time.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tax To Junk Food Essay

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Canada has a problem with obesity and an established solution is needed. Junk food is easily accessible and because of this, low-income families are more likely to purchase larger quantities of it due to lower costs. Obesity can lead to diseases and serious illnesses, and some of the most likely illnesses to be received from obesity include type 2 diabetes, uterine cancer, and gallbladder disease Illnesses and diseases are dreadful, however, the number of people that have them may decline by decreasing the amount of sugary, carbonated, and high sodium foods humans consume. A tax needs to be added to junk food because it will decrease consumption and reduce obesity rates, lower incidence of diseases, and the revenue generated by these…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I believe banning fast food would make the rate of obesity take a significant drop. Along with that diabetes, heart disease and mental health issues wouldn’t be as prevalent in a few years. Although people believe that this would be unconstitutional the country must take a stand against this so people stop getting sick and dying. Along with increasing the health of Americans it would also save us money on taxes because less people would use free health care. Banning fast food would help America out in many ways that is why I think they should do…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Food control affects those not in the target group, while leaving the overweight unaffected, writes Michael Marlow: “Another government favorite, taxing sugary drinks, does more to shore up government coffers than to reduce obesity. A few studies examined the impact of increasing sugary drinks taxes by 20 percent or more. They find that higher taxes do reduce obesity, but the effect is rather limited. Interestingly, soda taxes mostly cause people without weight problems to cut back their consumption, even though they are not the intended targets of the policy.” Also, the government is prone to lobbyists. In one case, Congress declared pizza a vegetable because of pressure from lobbyists.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consuming healthy food and beverages will help people lose weight, but there are also food and beverages people shouldn’t consume if they want to lose weight. Most greasy, fatty, or sugary foods need to be avoided to remain healthy. Soda and alcohol are both high in calories and sugar and can lead to the decline in people’s health and cause obesity. Purging, skipping meals, and starvation are very dangerous weight loss choices. Purging, a very unhealthy and dangerous method to losing weight can lead to eating disorders and even anorexia.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    By doing this type two diabetes and obesity and the health issues that have been derived from these epidemics will decrease this will mean that more people will be healthier and therefore live longer. At the moment junk food is ludicrously cheap; you just have to go into your local supermarket to see that a bottle of coke is sold for only a dollar whereas a bottle of low fat milk is sold for $2.50 another example…… Now if you were on a low income, of course you would pick the cheaper option and by increasing the price on junk food and making the healthy food cheaper the people in the lower socioeconomic groups may have no choice but to buy healthy food. So therefore the government needs to increase the numbers of farmers markets and provide zoning incentives so they can place supermarkets in low socio-economic areas so people can buy healthy food at an affordable price. This means that kids will be able to go to school with healthier lunches. This could mean that kids will be much healthier as well as the adults.…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They manipulate people into eating their food so they could get more money. The first effect of fast food is obesity. Many people are becoming overweight and not caring about what they eat. They love the taste of fast food yet they don’t know of the danger it leads to. Fast food is very unhealthy and can cause you to face obesity, “Since 1980, the number of obese children has more than doubled to 16 percent…” (Barboza,pg.38).…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “The industry 's principal arguments are also not without merit. It posits rightly that such taxes are regressive. They affect poorer families, which spend a higher proportion of their income on food, more than wealthier ones (Cooper).” Another purpose of the tax is to implement better lifestyle choices and promote healthier product consumptions. The tax does not target poorer families, instead directly benefits them and their choices. Tejvan said that “it is unfair to tax fat people.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics