Ideal and real knowledge connect with each other because in order to have experience you have to get results from what you do/learn in the world; however, they have their differences which is ideal is clean, good, value and real is messy. The dual system processing slow, high-energy, voluntary (system 2) is supported by ideal and fast, low-energy, involuntary (system 1) is supported by real. We use both ideal and real in order to help ourselves to come to an understanding of the world we live in.
Dual system processing is what our brain use to respond to our surroundings. Slow, high-energy, voluntary (system 2) allows us to stop and think of our mistake, then be able to correct it, and fast, low-energy, involuntary (system 1) allows us to …show more content…
Knowing requires beliefs to consider it knowledge; however, modeling we use metaphors to help exaggerate what we are describing/talking about, but we consider metaphors useless. As a community we prefer to use modeling in our daily life; although, we use knowing when we have evidence to support our claims.
No, because useful doesn’t have any validation. In order to have a claim that has epistemic value requires validation. Without truth or accurate a claim is no longer stable because truth and accurate has evidence to support the claims. Yes, we do interpret our own mental state, because we consider our minds to be opaque which is one thing our brain will translate and help us understand. The time I think we are not interpreting our mental state is when our minds are no longer opaque and becomes difficult. Meaning that if our thoughts are not opaque we do not have opaque beliefs and reasons, which means we have no knowledge.
Foundationalism focuses on the “real” and uses the cone structure, and uses the Descartes doubt test. The cone structure is having a narrow foundation and have a broad spectrum for support. Descartes doubt test help determine the foundation for a narrow
Dual system processing is what our brain use to respond to our surroundings. Slow, high-energy, voluntary (system 2) allows us to stop and think of our mistake, then be able to correct it, and fast, low-energy, involuntary (system 1) allows us to …show more content…
Knowing requires beliefs to consider it knowledge; however, modeling we use metaphors to help exaggerate what we are describing/talking about, but we consider metaphors useless. As a community we prefer to use modeling in our daily life; although, we use knowing when we have evidence to support our claims.
No, because useful doesn’t have any validation. In order to have a claim that has epistemic value requires validation. Without truth or accurate a claim is no longer stable because truth and accurate has evidence to support the claims. Yes, we do interpret our own mental state, because we consider our minds to be opaque which is one thing our brain will translate and help us understand. The time I think we are not interpreting our mental state is when our minds are no longer opaque and becomes difficult. Meaning that if our thoughts are not opaque we do not have opaque beliefs and reasons, which means we have no knowledge.
Foundationalism focuses on the “real” and uses the cone structure, and uses the Descartes doubt test. The cone structure is having a narrow foundation and have a broad spectrum for support. Descartes doubt test help determine the foundation for a narrow