Drug Pushing Case Study

Improved Essays
Drug Pushing: a Prescription Proposal from a Pharmaceutical
Valencia Cave, Holly Costanzo, Sean McCart, Josh Mosholder
Towson University
Michael Kim is a pediatrician at a practice outside of Baltimore. Walking into his office one day, he sees a brand new golf clubs set against his desk. He remembered getting an email earlier that week from Apativ, a large pharmaceutical company. It was about a new drug, Paxaflora, which helps children with congestive heart failure. If given the drug, it would lower blood pressure, decreasing the heart’s workload. It should keep their hearts going before they get a transplant. It could really help kids, like Dr. Kim’s patient, Alex. Alex has been waiting for a new heart for the last two years, and Paxaflora
…show more content…
Kim knows that his patient wants to be as comfortable as possible and didn’t know if he should prescribe Alex the drug and take the risk of severe side effects when there are other medications that will satisfy Alex and his parents with less severe side effects. Dr. Kim was surprised that Mr. Smith at Apativ actually did so much for him and appreciated it, but wondered why Mr. Smith put emphasis on the positive aspects of Paxaflora and left out important information that might affect the patient in a bad way. Dr. Kim’s boss, Dr. Grey, wanted him to prescribe the drug because Mr. Smith at Apativ was paying him to promote Paxaflora. Dr. Kim felt forced and did not want to disappoint his boss by not going through with prescribing Paxaflora to Alex. He also would feel bad because Mr. Smith did so much for him. Should Dr. Kim prescribe the drug and risk the severe side effects that Alex’s parents wanted to avoid?
Case Study Questions
1. What should Dr. Kim do? How should he approach this situation to the pharmaceutical company? Should he tell parents about the drug?
2. Can doctors be objective in prescribing when they are plied with free samples, gifts, and consulting fees?
3. Do you think that it is ethical for Pharmaceutical companies to compromise the doctor’s full understanding of the drug to get better sales?
4. Why should physicians only consider patient needs when having meetings with
Pharmaceutical reps? 5. Is it ethically appropriate for pharmaceutical companies to dismiss important risk factors that might affect the patient 's’

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Disease Mongering Essay

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Moynihan, Heath and Henry argue that the pharmaceutical industry capitalises on the want of consumers to eliminate undesirable conditions. They claim that pharmaceutical companies partake in “disease mongering”: that is, they fabricate new diseases by “widening the boundaries of treatable illness”. Critics such as Healy and Dossey agree with this claim. However, I will argue that, although not unfounded, the claim that pharmaceutical companies are guilty of disease mongering is not justified. I will argue that the definition of disease presented by Moynihan, Heath and Henry does not conform to the accepted definition of disease.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am not saying that all medicines should be avoided, I am saying the use of a “miracle pill” is just not a healthy alternative to good nutrition and a healthy lifestyle. When will consumers finally figure out that this “symptom stomping” way of life brought on by big business is not the answer? Alternative medicine not only focuses on the symptoms but also the cause and effect of certain illnesses. Now, there are some side effects to alternative therapies and consumers need to be educated about how they should treat their bodies but, it is my opinion, if you treat you body with respect it will respond with optimal…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Vaccines: Article Analysis

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is also unethical to let a human die in a trial of a new drug, but they are not comparable because one was intentional and the other accidental. The author is trying to use ethos and pathos to make you question the motives and the testing of vaccines. Perkins is also trying to make readers feel sympathy for those who suffer from vaccination testing, and use that sympathy to arise anger towards corporations. The…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is one of the problems that can lead to a failure of prescribing only generic salt. Doctor might perform this duty and prescribe the salt to the patient but then it is up to the chemist as to which drug will he provide the patient with. The chemist will compare the profit that he will earn from selling the branded drug or the generic drug. He will definitely be biased to sell the branded drugs because the profit margin in wholesale and retail prices of branded drugs is big. 6.3 Quality Control The generic drugs are not 100% same as the branded drugs.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They are even willing to pay for the construction of new labs. By doing all of this they are pushing these new doctors to use their medications because it makes the doctors feel indebted to the pharmaceutical company. Unfortunately the only ones who face the consequences are the patients, because there is a chance that they are receiving medications with little to no real research and statistics showing the medication is safe and…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Those individuals and friends or family members who know about the problem think that just because it was prescribed by a doctor who should have the best of intentions when it comes to your health and because it was manufactured by a major pharmaceutical company who is mostly likely strictly regulated to make sure the drugs you are taking are manufactured correctly that everything must be ok. But that doesn 't mean that there is not a serious health hazard associated with it, afterall it still is an addictive drug that has the potential to kill you if it is not taken properly. Once people stop viewing an addiction as ok just because the drugs are prescribed by a doctor than we can start realizing that there is a serious issue at hand and if it is not addressed properly it could end up costing…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By pushing the consumer to ask their physician for their drug, an older, tested, safer drug may not be utilized if a medication is truly called for. The only benefit of direct-to-consumer advertising is to that of the huge drug manufacturing companies, companies that are a multi-billion dollar industry, not to the consumer. It is harmful to the consumer to lead healthy people to believe they are sick, harmful mentally and…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “First, the court must determine whether the search furthers a special need of the state, and second, the court must determine whether this government interest outweighs the individual 's privacy interest.” (Shaberg). Many people argue about how it is an invasion of privacy, but if there is a dangerous situation, drug testing will only benefit that person. However, what is truly unfair is that people who are employed have to take a drug test before they get a job, and welfare recipients do not. If people who are applying for a job to get money have to take a drug test, then welfare recipients should have to too. It is only fair that people receiving welfare should have the same procedures to receive money.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the reasons is that the doctor will recommend the companies drug. With the DCA it has its advantages when doctors see the commercials/advertising it helps the health care physician remember the medicine, if not the doctor might not consider this drug to be an option to prescribe. If patients ask about the medicine they see in commercials/advertising that means the doctor will have to be familiar when it comes to the pharmaceutical company’s drug. I believe that politics is one of the reasons why United States (US) and New Zealand are the only two countries in the world that at the moment allow the Direct to Consumer advertising by drug. American companies, including pharmaceutical, are allowed to make large campaign contributions and pharmaceutical companies have a higher political power than doctors, and DTCA is…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For taxpayers, it gives them a lack wanting to pay taxes or even have a job, knowing that many misuse welfare to buy drugs and fuel their addictions. If people can receive money without making an effort in bettering their lives, it would also discourage people from having jobs.This will get rid of those people who take advantage and abuse the benefits they receive. The idea of drug testing for welfare makes it a highly debatable issue. Drug testing for welfare would be a good thing not just for taxpayers but also for the safety of families who deal with drug abuse. Drug testing for people to receive government assisted programs would benefit due to the fact that it would single out those recipients that abuse drugs, taxpayers ' money would go to those recipients who are really need the…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays