Doctor Nemur And Doctor Strauss

Improved Essays
Bessette
I think the doctor Nemur and Doctor Strauss did act ethically because they tested the procedure on a mouse instead of testing it on Charlie right away. People think that they should of not used Charlie Gordon for their science experiment and the doctors did not act ethically. The mouse was smart and had smartness for a long time so they decided to try to make a human smart which was ok to Charlie Gordon, because he wanted to be smart. Ethics is what you feel is right or wrong and these doctors acted right. This essay will outline why they tested this operation on Charlie to make him smarter.
Before this procedure even started on Charlie Gordon they tested the procedure on a mouse to make sure the mouse will be ok in this procedure

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    During 1950’s there was no such clear guideline even in the Nuremberg code (1947, developed after Nazi experiments) that prevents the research (proves unethical) on human tissue. The medical researchers completely disrespected the Henriette lacks…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When HeLa cells started to be sold, do you think Dr.Gey should have stepped in to assure that Henrietta Lacks’ family was compensated in some way? Do you think they should be compensated at all? Dr. Gey should have looked out for the Lacks family and let them know about the cells back in 1951. The lives of Henrietta’s children would have been greatly improved had they had that money. The Lacks family deserves compensation not only because Henrietta’s cells were taken without permission, but because without them, science would be nowhere near where it is today.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My first reason why I think that Charlie shouldn’t have this operation is because once he becomes smarter he loses his job which he loved dearly. His co-workers thought that he was too smart and that now it was harder…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Seth Ligtenberg Hr. 3 Trimble Charlie Gordon Essay Charlie Gordon the most intelligent man that ever lived. But the question remains, did Charlie Gordon's doctors act ethically before and after the operation or surgery on Charlie Gordon?…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think charlie was kind of treated like an animal because these doctors didn't know if it would work on a human or what the effects could be. The psychologists did not publicize what was going on. No one or thing was harmed or mistreated in the book. In my opinion, the surgery wasn't morally or ethically right because I believe we were all put on this earth as we are and we shouldn’t change ourselves based off of society. However, they did go about it fairly nicely and complied with the ethics of psychology…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No Mas Bebes Essay

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body, as well as the infirm.” These doctors that performed these surgeries showed a blatant disregard for human autonomy. There is absolutely no justification for what they did. Dr. Rosenfeld did what he felt he needed to do by bowing the whistle on this crime. They violated the Hippocratic oath they swore to uphold.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks’ Skloot develops variety’s of central ideas throughout the text. One of the central ideas is patients rights. She anylisis this central idea by demostrating how the patients have their rights, yet its like they didnt have any. First off with HEnrietta, Henrietta was a african american patient at hopkins hospitl. Which was the only option she had since segregation was a thing back then.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Simmons Case

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ku Klux Klan member, Thomas Simons, was severely assaulted leaving him with damage that resulted in his brain no longer functioning. The Simons family was immediately consulted for donating his organs to help save lives. Thomas Simons had many healthy organs for use like his heart, liver, lungs, kidneys, pancreas, as well as his corneas and small intestine. Since Thomas Simons was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, his family would only agree to let his organs be donated under specific restraints. His organs could only be donated to white recipients per the family’s request.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From there part D of the ASA code of ethics goes on to tell socialogist that they need to take into consideration the rights, and well-bieng of individulas as well. Then to try and root out any kind of bias they may hold. Socialigist should always respect others right to disagree with them is talkeda about. While again in my opinion there was not information given to fully form a understanding on some principles, overall I think Milgrim upheld part D of the code. The experiment presented no danger to the test subject's health mental or physical health in accoradance with the first part of D.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tuskegee syphilis experiment was a horrific study done on African American men in 1932, with many unethical actions. The men were told that there were being treated for having “Bad blood”, when in fact they had a sexual transmitted disease that can lead to painful, and deadly symptoms such as hallucinations, weak nervous system, or even cardiovascular problems. The are many unethical points in this study that were overlooked. One being is that the men were not informed on the whole purpose of the experiment or the dangers of the study. In the beginning I understood the sole purpose of the study, and how it could have been beneficial for them and whoever else had the disease.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One reason why the study was unethical was that no one knew what was really going on. The text says that for a study to be ethical all parties must know what is being researched, what one will experinece, and any risks that may arise due to the experiment. Neubauer failed to tell the parents which adopted the children, anything other than that the kids were a part of an ongoing study. Both the parents and children didn't know what to expect and didn't know of the risks that the experiment brought because Neubauer declined to tell them anything about the experiment. According to the sisters they are very much alike even though they grew up in completely different places.…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the past there have been experiments conducted that have done more harm and little to no good. There is a line that can be crossed between a toll being taken for the greater good versus people being exploited and put in harm’s way. There can be a larger benefit to society for the sacrifice that people have made. However, there are several experiments that cross that line and have little to no benefit to society or the greater good. People should not suffer for trivial findings, nor should people be treated in an unethical way for an experiment.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram Experiment Introduction Many people question whether the Milgram experiment was ethical or not, and whether the experiment should had been allowed at all. But like most significant psychological discoveries, sometimes ethics could’ve been overseen in order to obtain great data. Because of Milgram experiment, psychologists today have a better understanding of group dynamics. Milgram’s experiment enabled better understanding of human obedience to an authority figure. Ethics that might have been violated throughout the process of Milgram’s study can be justified in the experiment itself.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although some topics may be considered controversial, they need to be talked about. This is true with the subject of animal testing. In an article published in the New York Times, "Second Thoughts of an Animal Researcher", author John P. Gluck informs the reader why a scientist, who formerly conducted experiments on monkeys, would change his views to be against the practice of animal experimentation. He does this by using personal experiences. In another article, "Animal Research is Wasteful and Misleading", authors Neal D. Barnard and Stephen R. Kaufman use scientific data and evidence to make a logical case against animal testing.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays