John Locke Vs Hobbes Essay

Improved Essays
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were both men of great influencers of their times. Their works both studied the transition from the state from the state of nature to government rule. But both disagreed on the method for that transition and what kind of government was best for the citizen and sustainability of the state.
Thomas Hobbes wrote that the life of man was to be “poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” Hobbes viewed Natural Law as impossible without the state. That men could not know what is their’s or not because laws are the will of the ruler at the time, they change as the ruler does. Hobbes believed that all men were born equal, but due to that, men could all compete for the same thing. From this arose a state of war, with men constantly
…show more content…
In Locke’s mind, these unalienable rights are “Life, Liberty and the right to own property. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, the all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Locke’s words are in the Declaration of Independence, his ideas are the foundation of America. In his Second Treatise of Government, Locke creates his idea of an effective split in the power of government, into legislative, executive and federative. This closely resembles the current three branches of the American government, executive(The President and his staff), legislative(The Senate and House of Representatives), Judiciary(The Supreme Court and lower courts). These examples show that Locke’s words were influential and his greatest strength is that his words are hopeful. America at it’s beginning was hopeful and idealistic and this is obvious by the words they use in the documents that told the word who they were as a …show more content…
While Hobbes’ ideas can be proven from later history, Locke’s ideas are often disproved as we look at the later centuries. These ‘unalienable rights’ that Locke wrote about and Thomas Jefferson later infused into the Declaration have been taken away from many people. Even in America, a country whose pride is based in their upholding of these rights. A person’s right to life has been taken throughout American history, not just by death but by taking away a person’s ability to preserve their way of life. Whether that is by taking a person’s job, their right to travel freely(like during the time of Jim Crow laws on public transportation) or their right to raise a family safely. The right to liberty has also been taken away from many individuals throughout history. The right to liberty is the right to be free. So years after The United States of America declared the right of liberty to be inalienable, slavery still existed. It wasn’t until 2015 that same-sex marriage was legal in the United States. HOw can a country claim to have an unalienable right to liberty when many of it’s citizens don’t have basic

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The main way that the Founders used Locke’s wisdom and influence was to help them modify a republic form of government. Although, he did have other great achievements such as establishing America’s first principles, most notably the recognition of inalienable rights, and limited government A republic form of government was originally used by the Romans, but the Founders, George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Mercy Otis Warren, wanted to change it. A republic is a country that has a government in which power is held by people who elect…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Hobbes, man’s life in the state of nature was one of fear and selfishness. He believes man natural liberty must be limited because, “all mankind [has] a perpetuall and restlesse desire of Power after power, that ceaseth onely in Death”. Under Hobbes philosophies, a social contract focuses man to surrender all their rights and freedoms to an authority. This authority will then protect the lives and properties of the people. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen establishes Hobbes often discussed “natural rights of man [which] are the sole causes of the miseries of the world”.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 22: Enlightenment and Revolution Assessment –Research Worksheet Directions: Completion of this worksheet is a required part of your assessment for this unit. Please type into this document and email it to your teacher in the same email as the Facebook profile. Thomas Hobbes Where was he born? Thomas Hobbes was born in Westport, in 5th April 1588.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Declaration of Independence proclaims that all men are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” and that the purpose of a government is to ensure these rights (Jefferson 236). Its author, Thomas Jefferson, would alter the course of political history with that phrase, but it has still caused much debate today. The meaning of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” is somewhat ambiguous and has been adapted with different meanings throughout American history. A profound influence on Jefferson’s writings was the work of John Locke, a British philosopher, particularly known for his Second Treatise.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke points out the freedom of the ruled over the rights of the sovereign. Locke favors a legislature government over a monarch. He puts up in mind an administration with the fear of concentrated power. For Locke, the most horrible form of the regime is tyranny, consequently, as much as possible; he puts the power to the hands of the people, where Hobbes prefers the sovereign. The government of Locke obtains its rule directly from the citizens, whereas Hobbes’s monarch rules absolutely.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Locke and Hobbes disagreed about the nature of people, both of them made a point of stating that people had inalienable rights. Locke’s whole basis of philosophy was based on the belief that every human had natural rights, rights that existed…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most people take for granted many things we are afforded in this day and age. One of those things we take for granted is the government. Without said government there would be no laws to provide order and security, and we would be in a state of nature that would result in a state of war. A state of nature, regardless of who is detailing its differences, is basically a life without government rule leaving people to act out of self-preservation. A place without government is a place of chaos with everyone acting of their own accord.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hobbes beilved the goverment was to protect us from ourselves and Locke beilved it was to protect the natural rights. Hobbes beilved that the goverments power can not be limited and Locke beilved it…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both agree that subjects shall summit to a sovereign their right and obligations such as, judgment and consequences. It can be due to both having the notion that their ideal ruler(s) should have some sort of authority towards their men. In order to guide them to peace. Also by doing this their sovereign(s) can be portrayed as superior and subject’s inferior by having more rights and entitlement than them. In other words, it creates some hierarchical system where both Hobbes and Locke ideal ruler(s) authorize all that occurs within society and subjects shall be obedient with minimal input.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Locke And Hobbes

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Locke believed in a legitimate government that had a social contract. That the people would give up some freedom and in exchange the government had to provide them with protection.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was positive towards human nature and believed that humans were born with natural rights. He expressed his beliefs in documents called Two Treaties of Government and The Second Treatise of Civil Government. “Man being born, as has been proved, with a title to perfect freedom, and an uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law of nature, equally with any other man…” is a quote from The Second Treatise of Civil Government. It is shown in both documents that Locke believed that governments were formed only to maintain and protect natural rights. He disagreed with the idea of an absolute monarchy, but instead said that limited power was more effective.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This, the right of execution, is given up to the government in exchange for preservation of the other three natural rights. Hobbes views the state of nature as not a good place. He thinks of it as short and brutal. Weaker people can gain up on the stronger people. This makes everyone feel like they have a chance to get what they want.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man and the state of nature have varied and contrast immensely throughout different societies. Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau’s ideas about the state of man clash in the form of politics and social contracts. Locke’s view involves the power residing within the people, and the government is there to protect their property, life, and liberty. Hobbes’ ideas are in favor of a monarchy in order to keep the citizens secure and free from harm. Rousseau’s ideas on the politics shares a collective will amongst the population.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both theorists believe in natural rights and freedoms and how men establish governments in order to secure peace however they differ on the purpose of government. Hobbes believed the purpose of government is to impose law and order to prevent the state of war. Locke believed the purpose of government is to secure natural rights, namely man’s property and liberty. Both refer to a “state of nature” in which man exists without government, and both speak of risks in this state. However, while both speak of the dangers of a state of nature, Hobbes is more pessimistic, whereas Locke speaks of the potential benefits.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays