Differences Between Socialism And Socialism

Great Essays
During the 19th and 20th centuries, many countries revolted against their previous leadership, and gained independence from their former rulers. An incredibly popular form of government has been socialism. In this paper, I will examine the differences between socialism and capitalism. Socialism, by Merriam-Webster dictionary, is defined as “Any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.” Also, capitalism is defined as “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods …show more content…
As the government takes from the wealthy people, before they give anything to the poor, they take their share, filter it through their abundant employees, and by the time it reaches the rest of the people, it’s pennies on the dollar.
As fundamental a problem as it is, it is not the whole reason socialism fails. If you were a poor citizen in a socialist country, you have no reason to invest yourself more that you are required. There is no incentive to do better, you can’t improve your own position, your hard work will do you no good.
On the other hand, capitalism gives you hope for a better life. You can start a business, and even if you don’t immediately succeed, it will be left to your family, and it gives them a better start than you had. Many people came to America because of this, the American dream.
An extreme example of this, is Alexey Pajitnov. Pajitnov invented Tetris, which, according to CNBC, sold over 35 million copies on the Gameboy. Since Pajitnov lived in Russia, he didn’t collect royalties for his immensely successful game, the USSR, United Soviet Socialist Republics, collected the royalty checks, and used the money for the country. If Pajitnov had lived in the USA, he would’ve been a
…show more content…
Consider this, rich person worked extraordinarily hard to earn what they currently have, people aren’t born rich. Although some people in America were born into a rich family, somewhere down the line, they were poor and were forced to work their way up.
A portion of the poor are in their position because they weren’t the one that put in the extra hours to better themselves and their family, they’re there because of their own laziness. So when the government steals from the productive to give to the unproductive, it doesn’t work. It would be comparable to continually making an awful investment, when it is known that it won’t work.
Some people in the US claim that in capitalism, companies overcharge for their product, but in reality, companies can’t overcharge in a free market. In a free market, there are other companies that will produce the same product and try to do it as cheap as they possibly can so that it will sell more than the other company. As an example, let’s use a loaf of bread. In a completely free market, that loaf of bread will sell only for what the consumer is willing to pay for it. If the bakery charges $2 for a loaf of bread, but the consumer is only willing to pay $1, he’ll either find someone who sells it cheaper, or he’ll spend his money on something

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The resulting income should be earmarked for a program that encourages a sound diet for Americans by making healthy food more affordable and widely available” (Bittman). Although the author has a good point because yes you could tax unhealthy food but in reality it has one fatal flaw. Taxing food because you do not want people to consume it is unconstitutional. People are free to eat whatever they want. Americans are not known for liking high taxation especially when it come to what they eat.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is when people start to find aid in the government when actually the government will only help onto one point. People in America are hungry because even though we are the richest country in the United States we are the most poor in sending help to others. People in America are poor because the government doesn’t give companies the opportunity to help others that don’t have to eat. If the government was courteous enough they wouldn’t make companies pay taxes if they were to donate any type of food to the hungry or charity. It is very costly for a company to pay people to package the food and pay the workers and pay the shipping cost.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Andersen 208) Those rich countries can’t use their own population for their production because the labor is heavily expensive in their country and the economy will drop down. However, they use poor country who needs money because labor is cheaper. Social inequality pushed the core countries to send jobs overseas and thus those exploited countries tend to migrate in thinking that all the work is inside, which leads the economy to drop because everyone needs to be…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They work in unfavorable conditions and get paid much less then what Americans would get paid. The sad part is that they do not realize that they are making less than what Americans would make; they are only worried about keeping that job and making the money they can use to support their families. One of the problems the workers face is that it becomes a competition for them in order to get the job. Even though the job does not pay well, they still need every penny, or the currency they use, to make their own lives easier. Due to the NAFTA, the United States can open up factories in poor countries and have that country’s people work for them.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another interesting point made is that trade is based on voluntary exchange, meaning sweatshops, are not the horror protestors make them out to be. These jobs pay more than any other job offered to the workers of an impoverished country. Coincidentally, all the protests and boycotts for the rights of these workers and the demand for fair treatment of them, is problematic in the long run. The less people buy from the company these people work for means…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Society has learned to hate those in need, because the wealthy tell them time after time, that poor people are less worthy than those with money in their pockets. It is the fortunate people of this world that keep the poor people poor, by strengthening the welfare state, raising the minimum wage, and moving jobs overseas,…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Try paying fair wages and tax´´, by Peter Wilby, 2010. The text is about the bad side of the rich people and what cons there is about donating to these organizations. They donate to get around the tax, and when they donate they market their product and get even more money. They donate to show a good example of themselves, but they will not help their workers, and give them better work environment. They are trying to avoid taxes and even though they donate their money, they will still be rich.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Second, society only cares about the rich people in a market economy. They could produce expensive things for the rich while the rest suffer and starve. Pure market economies must figure out if its in its self interest to help out the…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Friedman and Social Responsibility of Business Introduction Milton Friedman believed and argued that business people take care of the responsibilities that affect them in their day to day life. However, they don't care the impact their businesses have on the society so long as their market is growing and increasing their profits. The main reason why he argued this is because believing in a reduced impact that the government has and a free-market. He found that government solutions to problems are no better because its solutions are even worse than the problem itself. As a result of his belief, he believed that the government should keep off the businesses activities because of its greed and the quest of people to have access to power.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    So if everyone were wealthy or were a part of the working class there would be no services and production of goods therefore leading to no distribution. Capitalism creates greed and self-interest. Greed and self-interest within a society establishes motivation and competition in the free markets. Free markets are a system based on the economic system that allow the consumers who buy the goods to set the prices of goods and allows for competition between privately owned businesses to be unrestricted. Business owners are allowed to be innovative and develop new products without the government interfering.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays