Difference Between Morality And Morality

Improved Essays
Benedict and Midgley The thesis of Benedict’s is that moral relativism is the correct view of the morality.
Benedict’s claim that every culture is different from one another. Morality differs from every culture, that’s why what is moral to one culture can be immoral to another. Which culture is right is which one is wrong? it is part of the culture points of view, because if every culture has different standards or right and wrong then we cannot say which one is the one with the total truth. Benedict uses normal behavior as a moral behavior and some of the example she uses in her writings show how sometimes some actions are abnormal in the culture, but with time it changes and they become normal. Morality is limit to and culture, with time
…show more content…
Moral isolationism is the view that we cannot understand a culture enough to make judgments about it. The only culture we know is our own, because we are part of it. She thinks that it is impossible to have moral isolationism, because our own culture was created by the influences of many other cultures. What are the four questions? 1.- Does the isolating barrier work both ways?, Are people in other cultures equally unable to criticize us? Midgley with these questions is demonstrating how we as a culture can be criticized, as well as we can criticize other cultures. Midgley answer these questions with an example in which a South American Indian, who lived two weeks among a group of white Brazilians while they were saving his life. After he was saved he was criticizing the way of life of the people who save his life, he condemn their practices after just two weeks living with them. Midgley, uses this example to support that moral isolationism is false, and we as individuals can criticize other cultures even if we are not part of them. The South American Indian, share just a part of this culture and in just two weeks is almost impossible to understand a way of life. Therefore, he was basing his claims on his own principals. Comparing this white Brazilians with his own …show more content…
This question help us thing about the way we thing as a society. What we let inside our own society, she talks about respect being earned. But to earn respect it is necessary to have a reason why. We cannot give respect to a culture just because we thing is honorable or right one or more things that culture did. We need to look more deeply and if we want to give respect or praise an event of a culture we should look at the dark side of the events as well. It is hypocritical to take just some of the actions and talk about those. If we look into a culture we need o do it as a whole, not omitting what we like. Every culture has good and bad events, traditions and customs, but if we what too talk about any of them we should consider the others as well. In the event of us respecting or condemning a culture for their actions, we certainly are criticizing them without being part of them. Not isolating our culture, actually we are bringing a part of their culture to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The central claims or ideas would be that we cannot judge our own culture if we could not judge others. So to critically assess ourselves, we must be capable of comparing our own culture with others so that we can glimpse what is positive or negative about our culture when compared with them. Other cultures provide information that we compare to so we can evaluate our own practices and policies. The central arguments would be crude judgments. Criticizing another culture without being crude, but what makes crude judgments crude?…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He notes how any society will have certain standards ingrained within its members and that these ingrained morals cannot simply just be forced aside when confronted with a separate society with differing morals. (Williams, 21) Rachels’ relativism argument and Williams’ counter argument are examples of philosophies without a universal moral truth and an argument that debases it. The case of Rachels’ relativism is a little strange in that, while the theory claims to be spreading tolerance of other cultures, the lack of a universal standard to base the moral judgements upon brings up the question of how one would judge their own moral standards. This is especially potent in cases where a culture permits acts such as conquest and genocide-acts that obviously will bring harm to others. The Nazi regime is a prime example of this.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Norms: How Do We Know When They Are Broken. Norms are what people expect others to do. In society people believe that people should behave a certain way. There is a lot of different norms that can be broken some are taken more seriously than the others. For example, Folkways are not strictly enforced, but mores are definitely enforced.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism is the belief that each culture defines their own morality and because of this we should not judge a cultures morality because one is not better than the other. Acceptance is a strength of relativism, because it could promote the idea that we are all different and we should all accept each other for who we are. Another of its strengths is allowing people to choose a moral code to live by and not be subjected to one way of thinking. However there are some downsides to relativism, for example promoting intolerance. Intolerance promoted due to the fact that if a culture is committing genocide relativists say that we are not allowed to judge them because that might just be a part of their culture.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, moral truth is relative and varies from culture to culture. Further on, he justifies why the cultural relativism argument is invalid, and why cultural relativism (if it were true) is an unacceptable form of morality. Finally, he makes concessions to acknowledge some valuable learning points of cultural relativism. In this essay, I argue the flaws in his conclusions and maintains that although it is important for objective truths to exist, cultural relativism may still be a best explanation for some extreme cases of disagreements that we observe today. The Cultural Differences argument postulates that different cultures have different moral codes.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We could not say that Martin Luther King, Jr. changed society for the better as that would be judging the social standards of another time. What happens then to someone who wishes to challenge their society’s moral codes? Their argument is immediately shut down by cultural relativism. “There are some moral rules that all societies must have in common, because those rules are necessary for society to exist” (Rachels 36). Not every moral code is different in different societies and cultures, Murder, for example, must be prohibited in order to have a complex society, and so there has to be some moral standard, meaning that the theory of cultural relativism falls…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Her conclusion was based on the principles that certain cultures and societies can determine ones moral beliefs. Since culture is such a divers system the morals of certain cultures also may vary. (467) This argument leans toward a more objective views where some cultures have a universal trend of having unique moral views. The social system is like a work of art that has different themes that turn into cultural tendencies that create a system where certain people live and believes greatly that morals support their actions. Benedict explains that that we need to consider why we think things to be abnormal or normal behavior.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Cultural Relativism is based on the belief that there is no universal morality, it is based entirely on the traditions of the culture one lives in. This is a subject that is up for debate amongst philosophers. While there can never be a definite conclusion either way, many people have strong opinions on what they feels is the right form of relativism. Ruth Benedict’s theory of moral relativism is based in the common practices and beliefs of cultures. She describes morality as something that is wholly individual to cultures, and which cannot be criticized by members of other cultures.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one culture is right in one thing than doesn’t that mean that other cultures are wrong? No, of course that doesn’t mean that. Moreover the idea of Moral Subjectivism states the view that rightness/wrongness of an action is determined by what an individual believe about rightness/wrongness for an action. If you don’t believe in something, don’t participate in that thing. Determining what is right or wrong is not going to be the same for every person.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deontology Theory

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It also tells us that we can never use humans as a means to an end, but consider them as unique creatures with human dignity. And finally on categorical imperatives, it dictates us to treat other people as we ought to be treated. Therefore to sum all these we found the collection of social media data, violates the moral law in that the exercise don’t apply morals in both situations. The exercise only focuses on safety and to criminalize somebody, but not considering the innocents and their privacy. The action of collecting social media data is definitely treating people’s information as a means to an end.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays