Rene Descartes, Epictetus And Plato: The Meaning Of Life

Superior Essays
As people mature, they begin to ponder about what the meaning of life is, particularly their own life, and they wonder what good knowledge truly is. It is a natural curiosity and has been thought about for several centuries. Philosophers claim to know, or at least be fairly aware of, what the meaning of life is and why attaining knowledge is imperative. Three that come to mind are Rene Descartes, Epictetus, and Plato; these three philosophers have lived through different time periods and differ greatly in theories. Descartes had no true theory but used skepticism to establish his philosophy, Epictetus was a Stoic, and Plato was a Platonist. One, Descartes, lived questioning anything and everything to only be sure of two existences near the …show more content…
In fact, in Phaedo, he goes into detail about why the separation of the body and soul is a positive thing; the reason being is that the soul is now free from desires and false perceptions that the body was making (Plato, 106). The only reason one must live righteously, according to Plato, is because this lessens the obstacles the soul would have encountered due to the body. Plato recognizes that all people have faults, but people need to realize what their mistake was and work towards improving themselves by gaining knowledge. The dialogues represent this through Socrates’ experience with Euthyphro, Meno, and Crito; Euthyphro was prosecuting his father because he thought it was pious, but he did not understand what true piety is which is why Socrates had to guide him by asking genuine questions about what piety is. In Meno, Plato discusses what type of knowledge can be taught and what good knowledge is; Socrates corrects Meno’s thinking and leaves him to ruminate about knowledge and virtue. In addition, Plato also explains the importance of living accordingly to society’s rules and why the soul is affected if one were to break these rules, in his dialogue …show more content…
These dialogues are also interrelated which furthers his theory because in each progression he gives more reasons to why attaining knowledge is crucial to living. On the contrary, Plato does not have a flat out theory in these dialogues, but unlike Descartes, the messages of his theories are clear. With that being said, another reason as to why Plato holds a genuine philosophical theory is because he allows the other person to contemplate on their opinions as well as the opinions he presented. This varies to Epictetus because Epictetus would say that there is only one way to think about life and knowledge and that is through God’s eyes, Plato, however, would allow a person to have their own opinions but his input will guide them to think about a better way of living and to acquire

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    None of the three components are good or bad on their own, but in Plato’s writing, the right direction of a human individual and the human society is kept when the mind is in charge.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By this, Plato meant that reason did not overcome spirit, spirit did not over come appetite and so on. The soul was essentially balanced. Plato believed that a soul that is in disorder is miserable and that person will never achieve happiness. He compared the soul to that of a city. An ideal city is that where all parts of the city are working together.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Knowledge is worthless without sacrifice,” Dr. Lauden says. (240-241) Every person has at least asked once in their life what is the meaning of their life, what purpose do they have on this land called, Earth. They imagine many possibilities but what if someone just told you what it meant. Would it mean anything to a person if it was so easily able to describe in just a couple of sentences.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    how little does the common herd know of the nature of right and truth. A man must be an extraordinary man and have made great strides in wisdom, before he could have seen his way to this” (p. 3). This quote from Socrates comes after he asks Euthyphro what he is doing on the porch of King Archon. Euthyphro responds by telling Socrates that he is there to bring up a charge of murder against his father. When Socrates points out that, according to accepted beliefs, it is wicked to harm or bring disgrace on one’s father, Euthyphro counters that that makes no difference.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato introduces many of his viewpoints and ideals through arguments. Some examples of what he introduces are what defines a city, principles of specialization, the tripartite soul and the sun, the line and the cave. In this paper, we are going to focus on the tripartite soul argument and the nature of justice. The tripartite soul argument states that a human soul is divided into three distinct parts that all want to achieve different goals. The soul, according to Plato, is composed of a rational, a spirited, and an appetitive factor.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, the eloquent, questioning tone becomes apparent through the dialogue because his placement of the question makes it seem that truth is common sense; he emphasizes his points in a strategic way which makes Glaucon, as well as the reader, think more than if he were to just state his opinion. This is significant because it reveals Plato’s stance as a philosopher as well since many people disregarded philosophers during this time, not believing in secular or enlightened ideas. Plato was able to convey an eloquent tone by asking many questions pertaining to his…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is the good life? Many philosophers believe that they know what a good life is, what it consists of and how the good life can be reached. Lucretius, a Roman philosopher who followed the idea of Epicureanism, believed that simple pleasures and avoiding pain is happiness which leads to the good life opposed to Epictetus, a Greek philosopher who followed the idea of Stoicism, believed that one should never desire or seek pleasure whatsoever. Although Epicureanism may sound similar to Epictetus, the founder of this system of philosophy was actually Epicurus, who was Lucretius' role model. His philosophy "proposed that the ultimate goal of human life was happiness, and that the greatest good was to seek modest pleasures in order to attain a…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Vs Judeo

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His works resonate with critiques of democracy and the pursuit of justice. His thoughts and teachings are deeply embedded with a singular question of what does it mean to be good? Often using his mentor and teacher, Socrates as the main character and focal point of his dialogues, Plato’s writings burn with the desire of a man trying to reconcile ‘right and…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meno Idealism

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nevertheless, Plato structured his ideas in a clear way, which helps the reader follow and understand the topic. The philosopher suggests a clear concept of a virtue as an unattainable abstraction. The peculiarity of this work is that it appeals to conscience and contemplation of the…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s, The Trials and Death of Socrates, Socrates is the ultimate cause of his own death because of not conforming to the democracy of the Athenians and corrupting the young. Socrates was a wise philosopher of his time and was in search of the truth, rather than believing in the Athenians Gods. Nevertheless, it was more than just a simple search for Socrates. His search for the truth turned into a complex journey to where the answer of true wisdom leads Socrates to be brought up on charges of corrupting society. He taught his philosophy of life on the streets to anyone who cared to listen.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Socrates Position

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Socrates describes the body as a contaminant, a chain, that the soul must be freed from in order to acquire knowledge. However, he makes the argument that the soul is superior to the body because the soul houses the knowledge of the forms (Phaedo, 73c). The way in which Socrates speaks of the soul and the body is antithesis. How can the soul, which is superior, be held captive by the body, which is inferior? In contradicting himself as such, Socrates further indicates that he does not speak from the standpoint of having…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Each group must perform their function and only that function. They must not interfere in any other business to uphold the political justice that is formed in the city. At the end of Book IV in Plato’s Republic, Plato attempts to mirror the political justice with individual justice. He claims that each of these classes of society are analogous to a three part structure of the soul.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believes that the mind and body are separate because people are a rational thinking thing. One needs to think to exist that was the first certainty Descartes came too. Thinking is what makes us exist and the body is simply an extension to that. The body is unnecessary to exist since a person can exist without a leg or an arm but you cannot deceive existence from thinking. Descartes uses the example of the triangle and in class we modified this to say one can imagine a pink triangle since what makes a triangle a triangle doesn’t depend on the color but you can’t imagine a triangle without three sides because that is what makes it what it is.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics