Meno Idealism

Improved Essays
Meno was written by Plato, an ancient philosopher who was the follower of idealism. In his works, the author defined the idea as something unreachable but, at the same time, the core of everything. In Meno, he presents a dialogue between Socrates and Meno, who are discussing a phenomenon of human virtue. They are contemplating about the meaning of being good and the possibility of getting such quality as goodness (Plato). This dialogue can be divided into several nominal parts with each supporting the main idea. Meno presents the main statement that it is impossible to gain virtue however far or close it seems to be.
First, a virtue is presented as something idealized. Socrates compares goodness to any other quality of a person, for example strength. In addition, he stops Meno from enumerating virtues by claiming that a virtue is an idea itself (Plato). Therefore, it leads a reader to the same conclusion: a virtue is ideal, so it cannot be reached. Led by the suggestive questions (which is a leitmotiv of the whole literary work), one may
…show more content…
Meno by Plato is supposed to be the beginning of the conception of idealism. It is hard to fully understand Plato’s intentions due to the great difference between the modern and ancient periods of time. However, it is clear that abstract thinking is justified as it supports the concept of idealism. Undoubtedly, such phenomenon as a virtue cannot be properly embraced in the realization by a human being. The discussion of the nature of virtuousness may only provoke a conflict of different views. Nevertheless, Plato structured his ideas in a clear way, which helps the reader follow and understand the topic. The philosopher suggests a clear concept of a virtue as an unattainable abstraction. The peculiarity of this work is that it appeals to conscience and contemplation of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meno’s paradox also popularly known as the ‘debater’s argument’ is one of the widely read dialogs by philosophers. The paradox is a Socratic dialogue authored by Plato. The paradox attempts to find out the actual definition of virtue. The main speakers or characters in this dialogue are Meno, and Socrates and the paradox arise as they try to discuss human virtues. In this dialogue, Meno puts forward numerous hypothetical definitions of human virtues, that is, arete.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    None of the three components are good or bad on their own, but in Plato’s writing, the right direction of a human individual and the human society is kept when the mind is in charge.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis of Plato’s Dialogue: Meno and Phaedo Introduction Plato wrote almost thirty dialogue, and Socrates is the major character in most of them. Platonic dialogue is a genre involving other texts such as Xenophon’s hiero and Plato’s law, in which Socrates, a wise man leads the dialogues those against each dialogues is Socrates who attempt to find out more about the understanding of other person concerning moral issues Meno In this Plato’s dialogue, the Socrates is faced with some very persuasive arguments with Meno, his another accuser. This dialogue’s main theme consists of the vivid explanation of real virtue by the Socrates utilizing brilliant epistemology.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Enlightenment Essay Assignment For most humans it is necessary to seek enlightenment. The quest for some to seek enlightenment may not be a easy road to travel. Gratification as well as disappointment may very well arise. It is my belief that the type of enlightenment Plato wants us to seek is true knowledge. Despite the trials and tribulations we may face, when in search of this enlightenment, we must take solace in knowing that “with knowledge comes great power “.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will demonstrate how Socrates ' response to this question was successful in answering the paradox. Meno’s Paradox Before Socrates ' answer can be understood, Meno 's Paradox must first be introduced. Meno begins by asking whether virtue is…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato was an outstanding and, until this day, a well-known philosopher in the Classical Greece. Also, he is considered to be one of the essential characters within the development of philosophy. He is major influence was his teacher, Socrates, who impressed in him that ‘love of wisdom’ and He passed that onto his own student, Aristotle. Some of Plato’s marvelous works are: Phaedrus, The Symposium and The Allegory of the Cave and the themes depicted in them are freedom (philosophical education), madness (in love and in life), love and beauty ( in all the aspects of our lives.) Now, I’ll go on into a deep analysis of Plato’s works previously mentioned, I’ll express my point of view about them and why even though Plato’s philosophy is based…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue In Plato's Crito

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just or unjust, good or bad, virtuous or vicious- Pablo López Yagüe The writings of Plato, Sandel, and Straus bridge centuries but all highlight the importance of political theory as the basis in providing a discourse for the reflection of life. Plato’s Crito focuses on reason by adapting the moral point of view on the affairs of justice and virtue, through the analysis of the human natural and the social contract. Sandel’s Doing the Right Thing deliberation on problems helps assess the difficulty of morality over individuals, society and the law in determining what is just and virtuous. However, Straus’ What is Political Philosophy considers the Socratic political philosophy thesis in an effort to restore rationalism, by criticizing positivism…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato introduces many of his viewpoints and ideals through arguments. Some examples of what he introduces are what defines a city, principles of specialization, the tripartite soul and the sun, the line and the cave. In this paper, we are going to focus on the tripartite soul argument and the nature of justice. The tripartite soul argument states that a human soul is divided into three distinct parts that all want to achieve different goals. The soul, according to Plato, is composed of a rational, a spirited, and an appetitive factor.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Vs Judeo

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His works resonate with critiques of democracy and the pursuit of justice. His thoughts and teachings are deeply embedded with a singular question of what does it mean to be good? Often using his mentor and teacher, Socrates as the main character and focal point of his dialogues, Plato’s writings burn with the desire of a man trying to reconcile ‘right and…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dialogue between Socrates and Meno revolve around a fundamental issue: whether virtue can be taught. However, Socrates indicates that it is unfeasible to answer this question without knowing what virtue really is. He is interested in knowing the intrinsic nature of a virtue and what makes all instances of virtue, virtuous. In other words, the reason why something is a virtue. Although Meno produces his first faulty definition when he says, “If you want the virtue of man, it is easy to say that a man’s virtue consists of being able to manage public affairs…, and be submissive to her husband” (71e), it still does not answer Socrates’ question.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that Socrates’s claim at 96c-d of the Meno that virtue cannot be taught because there are no teachers of virtue is not valid. Specifically, I will show Socrates reasoning and claim as to why there are no teachers of virtue, which means virtue cannot be taught. Then I will demonstrate why Socrates’s reasoning is false due to a missed detail in his argument. I conclude Socrates’s reasoning behind his arguments are mostly logical and sound, however he made the mistake of forgetting to mention an important detail that is detrimental to his argument. Socrates claims that virtue cannot be taught because there are no teachers of virtue at 96c-d due to various leaps of logic and reason.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Republic of Plato, Plato considers the nature and value of justice and the other virtues as they appear in both the structure of society as a whole and in the personality of an individual human being. This city-soul analogy supplies Plato with a metaphoric language that enables him to describe aspects of the structure and dynamics of the human soul. He began with a detailed analysis of the formation, structure, and organization of an ideal state before applying its results to a description of personal life. This paper will explore how the Republic uses the description of an ideal city-state as a vehicle for explaining the harmonious operation of the human psyche, which can be likened to a city. This “psychopolis” can be well or poorly…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Can Virtue Be Taught Essay

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The question “Can virtue be taught?” is a question that has puzzled philosophers for ages. It is a hard question to answer since we do not know what the true definition of virtue is. Socrates attempts to define virtue as knowledge, and if one is knowledgeable they will do the right thing without much effort (Plato, Meno). After time the meaning of virtue has changed. Today one could define virtue as being morally good.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Book 4 of the Republic, Plato discusses what virtues are in this ideal state and how it relates to the individual. For the first time, Plato shows the resemblance between the individual…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ discussion with Meno suggests that in order to gain knowledge one must first let go of any preconceived ideas and admit to our ignorance. Socrates evaluations of Meno’s attempts reveal that Meno does not know as much about the nature of virtue as he previously thought. In his first attempt he lists off different virtues that apply to different types of people: “ If you want the virtue of a woman, it’s not difficult to describe: she must manage the home well, keep the household together, and be submissive to her husband; the virtue of a child, whether boy or girl, is another thing altogether, and so is that of an elderly man – if you want that – or if you want that of a free man or a slave” (60-61). Socrates refutes this definition by pointing out that although Meno is able to give examples of what he believes are virtues, he fails to point…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays