Contributions Of Adam Smith: Founder Of Classical Economics

Great Essays
Adam Smith
1. Known as founder of Classical economics, regarded as starting point of classical economics.
2. Described as Father of Political economics
3. He most noted for his work ‘An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of the Nations’ (1776).
4. He is first economist to deal economic problem in systemic manner , hence heis also known as first academic economist.
5. Smith gives the idea “labour is the source of wealth of the nations”,
6. Adam Smith propounded the labour theory of value according to which the value in exchange of any product is measured in terms of the number of man hours that the labour has spent in building / manufacturing that product.
7. According to Adam Smith, wages are the payment for the factor of production
…show more content…
Rent is the payment for the factor of production that is land. As per Adam Smith, there exists a Harmony of Interests between that of the landlords and that of the society. Rents arose only when the economy was doing well. Hence, prosperity of landlords is a barometer to measure the health of the economy.
9. Adam Smith gave the theory of Laissez - Faire which believed in individual freedom. Adam Smith propounded that the individuals, in doing good for themselves would also end up doing good for the society as they would be guided by an ‘invisible hand’. Smith viewed the Government as wasteful, spend - thrift and corrupt and wanted least intervention by them in the economic affairs of a country. He also believed in a harmony of interests that existed between different sections of the society.
10. Both Adam Smith and David Ricardo believed in free foreign trade. Smith relied on the theory of Absolute Advantage to govern foreign trade. This meant that a country should produce and export only those goods in which it has an absolute monetary advantage over other countries and it should import those goods in which other countries have an absolute advantage in
…show more content…
Ricardo was one of the first people to give a complete and comprehensive theory of rent. According to him rent was a payment made to landlords for using the original and indestructible properties of soil. He believed in perfect competition, applied the Law of Diminishing Returns to the output derived from land and understood rent as arising from the differential fertility of land. He also propagated that rent arose from the differential situational advantages one piece of land had over another (nearness to market, water sources, etc.). He saw rent as a value determined by price and not as a price determinant.
9. Ricardo also believed on Laissez – Faire and least intervention by the Government, although, he did not believe that a harmony of interests existed between different section of the society (for instance, he believed in a conflict of interests between the landlords and the workers).
10. Ricardo, on the other hand, believed in the theory of Comparative Advantage to govern foreign trade. As per this, even if a country has an Absolute Advantage in producing goods over another country, it should produce and export only those goods in which it has a comparative advantage over other countries or a least comparative disadvantage with respect to other countries. And it should import those goods in which other countries have a

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Classical economists were steadfast proponents of the markets, contending markets without interference can naturally maximize both individual and public interests. The economic orders that benefit the whole society emerge as the unconscious result of actions and voluntary transactions of each individual (Friedman & Friedman 2011). Competition within market is positive, through which the pursuit of self-interests by individual, the basic unit of society, can generate the socially beneficial outcome. The reason is that producers would strive to increase efficiency and decrease the cost of production, in their attempts to augment personal profit, thus the price of commodities would be kept low and resources are ensured to be used in the most…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They also included that the taxes should be based only on the ground. Due to the fact that Physiocrats believed in a natural order superior to any human design, they conceived the economy as a self-regulating mechanism and therefore rejected the controls imposed by the mercantilist…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning with Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, bourgeois political economists have theorized that the value is a function of a worker’s labor. In Capital Volume One, Karl Marx illuminates this idea and adds nuances to it, explaining underlying relationships between labor and value. Namely, Marx introduces the concept of socially necessary labor-time and uses it as a point of departure for considering the links between labor, value, and material wealth. In Capital, Marx elucidates the intrinsic role of socially necessary labor-time in a commodity’s value, then uses his analysis of this role to fully define material wealth. In the very first chapter of his work, Marx explains that socially necessary labor-time is derived from the mass of…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith extensively discusses what is natural about human activity in a commercial society. By contrast, Marx extensively insists much of what Smith called “natural” is in fact social. Smith believed that each individual would try to maximize his own utility and gains. As a result, consumers would pay as what they would value the benefit of the good as, and producers would only sell as much as they spent of producing the good or higher based on value.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx had an opposite view on how a society should work economically and it was not such of a capitalistic economy. Karl Marx was much of a communistic ideals in which he addresses in his book the Communist Manifesto. Karl Marx believed that in a capitalistic government the rich will only get richer and a disadvantage to the poor. Karl Marx argued and writes “The capitalist is always in a better position to negotiate a low wage for his workers.” In such way Karl Marx ideas were not similar to capitalistic views in any way, he believed that much of capitalistic views were to destroy the citizens. Karl Marx believes that goods and services is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this instance, the market forces of demand/ supply should be left to determine the level of quantity along with price. Hayek advocated the free market within an economy (Fukuyama 2011). Based on my arguments above, I would openly, as well as totally agree with Hayek. There is the need for less government intervention in solving economic issues. Less government intervention results in free markets together with perfect competition, allowing the forces of demand and supply to determine prices along with quantity within an economy.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    F. A. Hayek's Analysis

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The leisure class is largely divided from society as a whole. This class has become conservative by nature (198). And conservatives do not seek progress, the progress that is believed to be so imperative to Hayek. Instead, in regards to social change and evolution, the leisure class seeks to, “retard the movement and to conserve what is obsolescent,” (198). It is important to realize that this class came to be under the guides of the current economic system, and does not seek to halt any of the material and political advantages that allowed them to gain a status of leisure.…

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith Influence

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Classical economic theories started developing during the late 18th century in England with Adam Smith. The theories of the classical school ended the mercantilism and dominated economic thinking till late 19th century. It focused on economic growth, economic freedom, and free competition. Adam Smith is the greatest economic thinker of all time. His work changed the economic thoughts of his time.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the greatest contributors of economics, Adam Smith wrote “The Wealth of Nations “in which he argued the economic trading system of mercantilism during the 16th and 18th century. In “The Wealth of Nations” he presented his idea of the free market, which is commonly known as Laissez Faire that focuses on free trade and free competition of products without any interventions of the government. Learning about Adam Smith’s “The Wealth of Nations” there are some pros and cons if we put it in a context of our generation. In Smith’s “The Wealth of Nations” he has discussed the issues underlying on, how can, one’s country achieve a fair and equal share of wealth. He has suggested ways on how his theory can be a solution to the economic…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx is a socialist political theorist who brought revolutionary change and Locke is a liberal political philosopher. Marx critiques Locke's liberal theories such as the state of nature, private property, labor, money, and slavery. In Locke's state of nature, all men had natural rights to be equal and free without anyone placing harm on his life, liberty, and property. Marx believed that liberalism instead of providing equality among citizens it was promoting inequality. When Marx critiques Locke's liberalist theories he proves some contradictions that Locke was against.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays