The Israel-Palestinian Conflict

Amazing Essays
Some studies on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict postulate the conflict has always been rooted in the question of partition of Palestine. But a game changing event took place in the form of the six days war between Israel and three Arab states, whereupon the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians began to transform into one of colonial nature. Israel has built a number of settlements on the territories it occupied in 1967, which practically is a form of annexation. The persistence of the settlements and uncertainty about the evacuation of these settlements has rendered the Israeli-Palestinian conflict the only remaining instance of settler colonialism in the world. Early Israeli political thinkers were aware of the need to have overwhelming …show more content…
Seeking a compromise with the Palestinians, most Zionists accepted the decision. The Zionist revisionist minority demanded a state on both banks of the Jordan river. Growing Zionist presence enraged the Palestinians and led to clashes. In 1936, Palestinians rebelled against British rule and demanded independence from Britain. In 1937, the Peel commission recommended the division of Palestine between Jews and Palestinians. The mainstream Land of Israel Workers Party ( MAPAI) accepted the idea but the Zionist revisionists and Palestinians opposed the idea. In 1939, Britain declared that henceforth Palestinians would rule Palestine. The Zionists disagreed and rebelled in 1945. Britain decided to leave Palestine and submit the issue to the United Nations. In 1947, the UN voted to partition Palestine into Palestinian and Israeli states. In 1948 Arab states attack Israel, sparking the Arab-Israeli war. Israel won the war and ended up with more land than was stipulated to the Jewish state in the UN partition plan.

Phase 3: ( 1949-1967)
Israel signed armistice agreements with Arab states in Rhodes in 1949, but not with the Palestinians. Majority Israelis come to view the Rhodes Armistice Lines as Israel’s permanent boundary. Though interested in the idea of acquiring all of Palestine and part of Jordan, the revisionist Herut party gives up on the idea by the 1960s. Palestinians establish the Palestinian Liberation Organization
…show more content…
Though annexing East Jerusalem immediately, Israel dithered to do the same with West Bank. A plan drawn up by Deputy Prime Minister Yigal Allon called for the annexation of areas around Jordan River, around Jerusalem and in the Gaza strip for security reasons, and the return of the rest of the territories to Jordan. In 1970, Israel accepted the land for peace principle enshrined in the UN resolution number 242. PLO said it would accept the resolution if it were amended to include a Palestinian

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Palestinian Nationalism

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Palestinian nationalism solidified as a result of British policies of divide and rule. Even though some historians date back the beginning of a Palestinian identity to the formation of the Palestinian sanjaq in 1874 (Khalidi, pp. 149-151), due to the religious attachment to Palestine as a holy land, it was far from a unified nationalist movement at that stage. The British reaction to the 1936 Great Revolt, which consisted of a brutal counterinsurgency campaign led by over 25,000 troops and dynamiting of homes, left a permanent scar on Palestinians and created an anti-colonialist sentiment which shaped the goals of the movement until 1947 when the British gave up on the Palestinian issue and handed the file to the United Nations – during the campaign, 10% of the Palestinian adult population were perished or wounded and in Jaffa alone, the British blew up 240 buildings (Bsheer, 2 Nov). The intentions of the British were clear as they exploited the situation that Palestine was a country without a political community, especially when the government appointed the well-known Zionist Herbert Samuel as the first High Commissioner.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Starting around the 1940s, when new anti-combat laws were established in Palestine for Jews to be able to live in peace and to prosper in their newly acquired “homeland” without Palestinian interference, the Palestinian Arabs’ power decreased as Israel’s land increased. Due to the ongoing violence in Palestine, the Extraordinary Zionist Conference called for the Biltmore conference, a peace conference representing the needs of the Zionists. The Biltmore conference (1942) stated, “Palestine should be opened for unlimited immigration under Jewish monitor, and that it also be established as a Jewish commonwealth” (Harms, 1408). In favor of the Jewish immigrants, this conference caused the Zionists to make more migrations to Palestine, caused the formation of new alliances against other nations and decreased the Palestinian Arabs’ power through their…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    174). Israel gained new territory in the 1967 war and ever since the occupied land has been used as either a bargaining chip in peace negotiations, or as justification for more violence. The Yom Kippur War was also significant as it was used as justification for massive increase in OPEC oil prices which had ramifications around the world (Gelvin 2007, p. 181). The invasion of Lebanon reflects the manner in which neighbouring countries become dragged into the conflict. Palestinian guerillas were fighting to reclaim their lands from Jordan, but were expelled by King Hussein in order to regain favour with Israel.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It makes no sense for the British diplomats to offer the same peace of land to two different ethnic, cultural and religious groups. The British government offered an independent state of Palestine to the Jewish people through the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour declaration is essentially the British Government giving full support for an independent state of Palestine to be a home for the Jewish people. During the dispute about who gets an independent state of Palestine, the Jewish people declared independence of the state Palestine region and thus creating a state of Israel in 1948. The way the British diplomats offered the Arab and Jewish people, both the same entity, which gave way for more dispute to happen between the Palestinian people and the Jewish people over independent state of…

    • 1329 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example, the United Nations employed Resolution 242 which rejects the right for Israelis and Palestinians to forcefully and aggressively steal one another’s land. It also demands the restoration of territory lost by Palestinians during wars. The resolution attempted to push the Arabs and Israelis towards peacefully coexisting, nonetheless, it remains unsuccessful. Additionally, all Arab states except Libya gathered at the Beirut Summit of the Arab League to endorse a plan for peace. The peace initiative presented an end to the Arab-Israeli conflict by offering recognition of Israel and stabilized relations among Arab states in exchange for Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied since 1967.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Israel Relationship Essay

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    History of Israel Palestine Relationship and Negotiations: A full timeline of Israel 's key events is contained in Appendix A. The country of Israel was established in 1947 when the UN voted to partition Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, wish Jerusalem and Bethlehem to be controlled by the UN. In the following years, around 750,000 Palestinian Arabs fled or were expelled from Israel, and up to a million Jewish refugees from Arab countries and 250,000 holocaust survivors settle in Israel. There is historical dispute on the cause of the Palestinian exodus, some left voluntarily (mostly the wealthy avoiding conflict), others left in response to Arab leader 's calls to evacuate, and others left due to expulsion from Israeli government…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They now only inhabited-in mass majority within-Palestine and Gaza. At this time, the rest of the Arab States began to focus themselves on Israel with their military forces, attacking from Jordan, Iraq and Egypt. The war involved is still incorporated into the overall conflict and destructiveness among the Arab and Jewish States of the Middle-East. Jordan lost the west bank to Israel as a result of their first attack. Egypt eventually switched leadership and accepted land as a peace treaty from Israel, however this was after another full scale attack in…

    • 2149 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since 1948 a brutal feud between Israel and Palestine broke out and since then has been a never ending chain of attacks towards one another. The hopeful outcome for both nations is complete control over the holy land , which was home to Palestinian muslims, but is slowly being divided and conquered by Israeli Jews. As said by president Barack Obama "The question, then, is what kind of future Israel will look forward to. And that brings me to the subject of peace." (n. pag.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This was due to the British only using the Arabs rivalry against the Ottomans and vision of an Arab state against them. At this time while the British had made the following deal with the Arabs they made another deal with the French, which is formerly known as “The Sykes Picot Agreement”. This basically was that once the Arabs had defeated the Ottomans, they would divide the land among them and the French, which would involve the following the British would take control of what is now Iraq, Kuwait and Jordon. The French were to be given control of Syria, Lebanon and Southern Turkey. The only undecided country was Palestine and that was said to be decided later.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Causes Of The Six-Day War

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Multiple statements were made public about Israel from neighboring countries. On May 28, 1967 (the day Nasser called off the Israel attack) the former president of Egypt, Gamal Abdel Nasser, had a press conference and said, “We will not accept any… coexistence with Israel… Today the issue is not the establishment of peace between the Arab states and Israel… The war with Israel is in effect since 1948.” Among the President of Egypt, the President of Iraq, Abdul Rahman Arif, spoke out of May 31, 1967 saying “ The Existence of Israel is an error which be rectified. This is our opportunity to wipe out the ignominy, which has been with us since 1948. Our goal is clear- to wipe Israel off the map” May 30, 1967 was the day that Egypt and Jordan signed a mutual self-defense pact. Cairo’s daily newspaper writes, “Under the terms of the military agreement signed with Jordan, Jordanian artillery, coordinated with the forces of Egypt and Syria, is in a position to cut Israel in two at Qalqilya (a Palestinian city in West Bank), where Israel territory between the Jordan armistice line and the Mediterranean Sea is only 12 kilometers…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics