Compare and contrast
The two greatest philosophers in politics have two different visions when it comes to politics, Thomas Hobbes is arguing that Social Contract is a better system and it should adopted while John Locke argue that liberalism is way to govern people and every other country should take that path. They two philosophers come up with good reason why they believe that their deferent system is better than the other one. The main different views they both have is how international institution system and security should work. John Locke is a politician philosopher that believes in order to live peaceful world the best system is liberalism. He argues that liberalism balance power there are institutions set in place that every state has to obey. John Locke argue that every human being has the …show more content…
He believe that human nature is evil, he says that “I put for a general inclination of all mankind, a perpetuall and restlesse desire of power after power that ceaseth only in death (pg 52)”. Hobbes saying we need a leader that has more authority above everyone. Hobbes argue that we as human being are self-interest if we have freedom we can bring more cease so, we need a leader that can stop that fear. Hobbes says that we need a Social Contract to establish political authority.
I agree that Thomas Hobbes some people need a social contrast. For example, where I come from Somalia used to be one of the best nation in Africa because there was only one authority that was ruling the nation, and every Somalia person will tell you that at that moment it was great time, however Somalian people try to look for democratic system because of differences interest Somali is the worst place to live. The reason for that is self-interest cannot create trust around the globe. It create only fear and dishonest for one
The two greatest philosophers in politics have two different visions when it comes to politics, Thomas Hobbes is arguing that Social Contract is a better system and it should adopted while John Locke argue that liberalism is way to govern people and every other country should take that path. They two philosophers come up with good reason why they believe that their deferent system is better than the other one. The main different views they both have is how international institution system and security should work. John Locke is a politician philosopher that believes in order to live peaceful world the best system is liberalism. He argues that liberalism balance power there are institutions set in place that every state has to obey. John Locke argue that every human being has the …show more content…
He believe that human nature is evil, he says that “I put for a general inclination of all mankind, a perpetuall and restlesse desire of power after power that ceaseth only in death (pg 52)”. Hobbes saying we need a leader that has more authority above everyone. Hobbes argue that we as human being are self-interest if we have freedom we can bring more cease so, we need a leader that can stop that fear. Hobbes says that we need a Social Contract to establish political authority.
I agree that Thomas Hobbes some people need a social contrast. For example, where I come from Somalia used to be one of the best nation in Africa because there was only one authority that was ruling the nation, and every Somalia person will tell you that at that moment it was great time, however Somalian people try to look for democratic system because of differences interest Somali is the worst place to live. The reason for that is self-interest cannot create trust around the globe. It create only fear and dishonest for one