Differences Between John Locke And Thomas Hobbes

Decent Essays
Why do humans tend not to think about the future and the preservation of our natural resources for the future generations? During the 17th century two philosophers John locke, and Thomas Hobbes were at war pertaining to their theories of man. John locke, believed that man is always good, that by state of nature men mostly keep their promises and honored their obligations. Also, men could manifest peace and we don’t have to go to war that we can refrain ourselves from being selfish and hurting other people. John locke believed in the optimism of the people. In contrast, Hobbes believed that the only way men could have a chance of living in peace if we gave all of our absolute power away to a higher monarchy. Also, that people by nature were

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes established his own ideas about people and politics. For example, Hobbes believed that humans were selfish and did anything to better their position. Also, he believed that nations were selfishly motivated and only battled for power and wealth…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Compare how the two philosophers Thomas Hobbs and John Locke, in an ideal state, who should have the power and how much power the ruler should have. First, we need to establish what is an ideal state. According to the two of them. Next, compare them both to one another and then try to explain their arguments. By describing their views in our own words.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyday, people carry on with their lives knowing that there is both good and evil in the world. Some might distinguish the evil outweighing the good, while others spot the good outweighing the evil. Whichever side one might choose from this debate, it is natural that for humans to stop and wonder about humanity. A recurring controversy that crosses over a person's mind is whether humans are naturally and inherently good or, worse, they’re naturally and inherently evil. Society tends to lean on the idea that humans are selfish, in fact, 78% of the population believes others to be more selfish than they really are.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke was very different from another great philosopher named Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes believed that the individual was completely helpless and corrupt. He believed that a monarchy was the best form of government. He came up with this because he traveled around the world learning about forms of government to help England’s. John locke, on the other hand, believed only that the whole was better than the self.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They do not even have the same definition of the common good. Hobbes says that everyone is always in search of power to have a one up on the next person in order to be happy. So a powerful government is only there to protect us and keep us happy. Locke says that political power is the right to promote the common good. Although, Hobbes might agree that it is to promote the common good, however, they have completely different ideas of the definition of the common good.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Locke and Hobbes disagreed about the nature of people, both of them made a point of stating that people had inalienable rights. Locke’s whole basis of philosophy was based on the belief that every human had natural rights, rights that existed…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Initially their similarities, followed by the differences. Concluding with a summary of some main points. I. Thomas Hobbes Both political philosophers, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704) have similar ideas in…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His similarities to Locke have much to do with the social contract theory, which he was also believed in. Despite this, the two theories differ fundamentally on why government has its place in society and how influential government can be. (p.15). Hobbes put a great emphasis on government, probably in part due to the era in which he lived. Hobbes did not quite live long enough to see the Enlightenment and the new ideals that shortly followed.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both theorists believe in natural rights and freedoms and how men establish governments in order to secure peace however they differ on the purpose of government. Hobbes believed the purpose of government is to impose law and order to prevent the state of war. Locke believed the purpose of government is to secure natural rights, namely man’s property and liberty. Both refer to a “state of nature” in which man exists without government, and both speak of risks in this state. However, while both speak of the dangers of a state of nature, Hobbes is more pessimistic, whereas Locke speaks of the potential benefits.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers John Locke and George Berkeley agreed that knowledge is derived from experience. However, while Locke argued that knowledge is also acquired through our senses, such as, primary qualities, the perception, and secondary qualities, the object perceived, Berkeley argued that our minds and ideas are the sole essence of most knowledge, except knowledge of self and knowledge of God. As a subjective idealist, he believed that physical objects only exist as they are perceived. More specifically, there are no primary or secondary properties of objects in themselves, and also, matter cannot be discovered through sensory perception. Both philosophers claimed that knowledge comes through experience, but Berkeley argues that material objects cannot exist if not experienced.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Views On Rebellion

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Extremely unlike Hobbes’s view, Locke had a more positive view of human nature and believed in their views and opinions. Locke believed humans could improve themselves and even a government if they were willing to do, so while Hobbes on the other hand believed that humans were narcissistic and only thought about themselves and strived for their own benefit. It is in Locke’s book “The Second Treatise on Government” that the most precise examinations into the right of revolution can be found. Its clear from his book that the right of rebellion and revolution ties hand in hand with Locke’s political theory. this book was used almost to justify the revolution in the late seventeenth century (O’Tool,2011).…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people specifically philosophers would question, “Why we need a state?” or “What kind of state should we have?” This question opened up all the different views and perspective of the three following philosophers, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. They all have different but also very similar views on the state of nature, social contract, laws. Hobbes definition of state of nature is a state of war. Morality doesn’t exists and everyone lives in constant fear.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their ideas on the state of nature, Hobbes has a negative view, while Rousseau believes we were better off in the state of nature. The basis for their different ideas on the state of nature contribute to their diverging ideas on their accounts of government by social contract. Hobbes argues for citizens relinquishing their authority to the state, while Rousseau contends for the sovereign authority to be in the hand of the citizens. I will argue that Rousseau makes a more convincing argument because it is one of compromise rather than extremism. Hobbes’ account of government by social contract is based on the basic principle and rational that people give up some of their rights in order to feel secure.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main similarity being what the purpose of the government or political power is, whereas the main difference is how they view the state of nature. Hobbes views the state of nature as a state of war, whereas Locke views it still as a society, but one that lacks true executive powers. Both philosophers made great contributions to political philosophy, but each had their own failures which later political philosophers tried to fix: “The tradition of political theory that begins with Hobbes and Locke, and continues today with Rawls and Habermas and their innumerable followers, has a blind spot, to which several theorists drew attention in the 1990s. That blind spot is the question of nationhood and nationalism” (Alexander-Davey, p.458). Overall, Hobbes and Locke had their differences, but each added something new to the conversation of political philosophy and the state of…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays