Comparing Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, And Rousseau

Improved Essays
Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau are four men with different but somewhat similar government beliefs. Hobbes believed that people were naturally equal, but created supreme power to create peace. He believed in giving up our natural right of equality to an absolute power and after doing so people can not revolt against this power. He called this a social contract. Locke believed people could never give up their rights such as life, liberty, and property. He wanted a leader, however, unlike Hobbes, people could revolt against this power if needed. He believed that adult males that owned property could vote, but the mass majority of people; such as women and the mass majority of men did not own homes, could not vote. Montesquieu believed

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    John Locke was very different from another great philosopher named Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes believed that the individual was completely helpless and corrupt. He believed that a monarchy was the best form of government. He came up with this because he traveled around the world learning about forms of government to help England’s. John locke, on the other hand, believed only that the whole was better than the self.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Locke and Thomas Hobbes’ views on humanity differed and it affects their views on government. The Enlightenment started from some key ideas put forth by two English political thinkers of the 1600s, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Both men experienced the political turmoil of England early in that century. However, they came to very different conclusions about government and human nature. ” John Locke believed that all people were born free, and equal with the three natural rights of life, liberty and to own property.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s philosophy contained a limited government or the notion of laissez-faire (hands off)! Concluding that men should be given civil rights as long as no harm was done to anyone. John Locke claimed all mankind was equal, believing that State of Nature has natural rights to freedom, liberty and justice. Meanwhile, Hobbes posed the notion that man was inherently evil and needed a monarchical government but both were against the Divine Right and developed the ‘Social Contract’(Carol 2017).…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though Rousseau’s ideas differ there are also some similarities. Rousseau, like Locke, believed that men are born free. Both Locke and Rousseau agreed that men had certain natural rights that they should not give up to any leader. Rousseau believed men in a state of nature are free and equal, but in a state of nature men were very different; Rousseau described men in a state of nature as “noble savages.” The only way to notice the many differences in Rousseau’s thinking in comparison to Locke and Montesquieu is by first looking at his…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes that without a ruler society will live in the State of Nature. This to Hobbes meant living in an almost civil war like society. Locke believed that in the state of nature people were good and honest, conflicts were resolved peacefully and justly. Locke believed that peace should be the status quo, and we can remain living this way as long as we respect each other. Hobbes believed that people can only live in peace when they turn over all rights to a sovereign.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of “The Right to Govern” changed drastically over time, and it changed by people having different opinions on the matter. For example, while Thomas Hobbes’s beliefs on the rights of the people to govern were heavily based on the system of total monarchy and people handing over their rights to a ruler. On the other hand, John Locke’s beliefs were heavily based off of the system known as self-government, and the right to consent to how much the government could govern you as a citizen. Locke’s views of human nature differ from that of Hobbes’ in the fact that while Hobbes’ views seemed to be more harsh on humans, Locke’s beliefs seemed to support and trust in humans more.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mark Alcasid Mr. Ochs World History/Block C 15 December 2014 Essay 1 Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Karl Marx were all philosophes who all essentially wanted the same things for society and government, but had their differences on how to achieve those things. Firstly, Thomas Hobbes, was a man who noticed the natural flaws in humanity. He saw that humans naturally live in a more savage lifestyle.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both agree that subjects shall summit to a sovereign their right and obligations such as, judgment and consequences. It can be due to both having the notion that their ideal ruler(s) should have some sort of authority towards their men. In order to guide them to peace. Also by doing this their sovereign(s) can be portrayed as superior and subject’s inferior by having more rights and entitlement than them. In other words, it creates some hierarchical system where both Hobbes and Locke ideal ruler(s) authorize all that occurs within society and subjects shall be obedient with minimal input.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosophers Hobbes, Marx and Locke all have very conflicting arguments but the philosopher whose debate favored the people rather than the government will be highly supported by the people because they tend to agree with something that favors them. Thomas Hobbes states, “The only way to erect such a common power, as may be able to defend [men] from the invasion of foreigners, and the inquiries of one another... is to confer all their power and strength upon one man, or upon one assembly of men...” - Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, 1651. I strongly disagree with what Hobbes has to say. He believes the people are all suborn and they all need to be controlled by an outside force, but I don’t believe that’s the case.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke and Hobbes were both social contract theorists, and both natural law theorists but that is just about all they have in common. There are more differences than there are similarities. Locke believed that man was a social animal by nature while Hobbes disagreed and thought man was not a social animal by nature and that society would not exist if it weren’t for the power of the state. Hobbes conclusions are the most different from the other natural law theorists. They both have different opinions on human nature, the state of nature, and many more topics.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people specifically philosophers would question, “Why we need a state?” or “What kind of state should we have?” This question opened up all the different views and perspective of the three following philosophers, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. They all have different but also very similar views on the state of nature, social contract, laws. Hobbes definition of state of nature is a state of war. Morality doesn’t exists and everyone lives in constant fear.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Society is a collection of individuals living in an ordered community that provides protection for all who reside in it. However, individuals do not directly consent to this system, but rather give tacit consent. As such, the question must be asked: “What was the period called before tacit consent was present in society?” Many political philosophers, such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau have called the period before society “the state of nature.”…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays