The Common Factors approach to therapy, in conjunction with other treatment approaches, can increase the probability of positive client change. It is not recommended that clinicians rely on one treatment approach when working with clients, because every client should receive a multidimensional plan that fits their unique needs. Clinicians are responsible for understanding best practices for various clients, such as those with severe impairments, where Common Factors alone would not suffice (Cameron & Keenan, 2010). The clinician needs to critically consider the clients’ suitability with various models and research model effectiveness. For example, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is a problem solving model focused on skill acquisition, the discussion
…show more content…
Additionally, depending on any existing diagnosis the client may have, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy may be proven effective (Cooper & Lesser, 2015). However, despite empirically supported studies, some clients may not respond well to certain treatments. In this instance, the Common Factors tools could be used in conjunction with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, to assist in monitoring the therapeutic alliance and progress. The Common Factors tools may identify that the client is dissatisfied with the use of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or may not understand the purpose of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, which allows the clinician and the client to be fluid and alter the treatment plan. Without the Common Factors tools identifying such displeasure, the client may end the treatment prematurely and decrease the probability of seeking therapeutic services in the future due to their negative experience. According to Barth et al. (2011) manualized evidence-supported treatments, however once thought of as superior, are now identified as less likely to be sufficient in incorporating research-based findings into practice with all clients. Pairing both Common Factors and Common Elements will enable them to meet a larger scope of
Additionally, depending on any existing diagnosis the client may have, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy may be proven effective (Cooper & Lesser, 2015). However, despite empirically supported studies, some clients may not respond well to certain treatments. In this instance, the Common Factors tools could be used in conjunction with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, to assist in monitoring the therapeutic alliance and progress. The Common Factors tools may identify that the client is dissatisfied with the use of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or may not understand the purpose of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, which allows the clinician and the client to be fluid and alter the treatment plan. Without the Common Factors tools identifying such displeasure, the client may end the treatment prematurely and decrease the probability of seeking therapeutic services in the future due to their negative experience. According to Barth et al. (2011) manualized evidence-supported treatments, however once thought of as superior, are now identified as less likely to be sufficient in incorporating research-based findings into practice with all clients. Pairing both Common Factors and Common Elements will enable them to meet a larger scope of