Essay on Cloning Should Be Regulated By A Moral Compass

772 Words Feb 27th, 2016 4 Pages
“I have no objection to cloning as such as a technological instrument for medical and therapeutic purposes. As in all these cases, what must govern one 's decisions is the question of compassionate motivation. However, regarding the idea of deliberately breeding semi-human beings for spare parts, I feel an immediate, instinctive revulsion,”
-Dalai Lama. Cloning should be regulated by a moral compass to prevent unethical procedures and practices with this technology. The moral compass should be a set of standards that are aligned with deontology and based on ethical principles. Although cloning has and will accomplish more remarkable feats in the future one must keep in mind that in the wrong hands could result in a moral issue. An example of this would be the unethical method of organ harvesting from living sentient beings. Also, using cloning technologies for the wrong purpose instead of using it for medical and therapeutic applications can lead to unethical results. Obviously, cloning should be regulated by a moral compass to prevent unethical uses such as organ harvesting, and for reasons other than medical and therapeutic. Furthermore, this technology of cloning should be policed by a set of moral standards to avert unethical uses like organ harvesting. Imagine from the first day born one’s life was already determined as host to harvest organs for other people. Another example is the movie The Island, a hollywood science fiction film based on a society that depended on…

Related Documents