# Essay on Clarkson Lumber

1187 Words Dec 28th, 2010 5 Pages
hult international business school | Clarkson Lumber Company | | | Adeeb Valiulla | 1/3/2011 |

|

Summary
Experiencing rapid growth in business and generating fairly good profits, Mr. Keith Clarkson the sole owner and president of The Clarkson Lumber Company still faced a shortage of cash and found it necessary to increase his borrowings, he was therefore on a look-out to start off a new banking relationship where he could not only borrow a larger loan amount but also one that did not require a personal guarantee attached.
Suburban National Bank, Mr. Clarkson’s current bank was willing to offer him a loan amount to an extent of \$ 400,000 which also called for a personal guarantee. Northrup National Bank, on the other
term debt | \$ 464 | Income tax Payable | \$ - | Total Liabilities | \$ 1,173 | Net Worth | \$ 454 | Total Liability & Net Worth | \$ 1,627 | Income Statement | FY - 1996 | Sales (Net) | \$ 5,500 | COGS | \$ 4,160 | Gross Profit | \$ 1,340 | Operating Expense | \$ 1,149.80 | EBIT | \$ 190.20 | Interest Expense | \$ 53.04 | EBT | \$ 137.16 | Provision for Income Taxes | \$ 22.25 | Net Income before tax | \$ 114.91 | Net income | \$ 114.91 |

* Accounts Payable = 364 – 364 = 0 * Long Term debt = 100 + 364 = 464 * Predicted Sales = \$ 5.5 million * COGS = 5,500 * 75.64% (75.64% is the average % calculated on the basis of last 3 years) * Interest Expense = 13 + (364 * 11%) = 53.04 * Income Tax calculated based on “c” given in Exhibit 2 (= 22.25)

Statistics of Lumber Outlets Percent of Sales | High Profit Outlets | Calculated Ratios | COGS | 75.1% | 75.64% | Operating expense | 20.6% | 20.91% | Cash | 1.1 | 0.96 | AR | 12.4 | 10.60 | Inventory | 11.6 | 11.04 | Fixed assets, net | 9.2 | 6.98 | Total Assets | 34.3 | 30.0 | | | | Percent of Total Assets | | | Current Liabilities | 29.2% | 43.58% | Long Term Liabilities | 16.0 | 28.52% | Equity | 54.8 | 27.90% | | | | Current Ratio | 2.52 | 1.16 | Return on Sales | 4.3% | 3.46% | Return on Assets | 12.2% | 10.21% | Return on Equity | 22.1% | 25.31% |

| Loan Amount - \$ 364, 000

## Related Documents

• ###### Clarkson Lumber Essay examples

I. Introduction Clarkson Lumber Company has been in growth during recent years and anticipated a further increase in sales. Despite of consistent profits, the company has suffered shortage of cash and borrowed fund needed for its business growth. Question #1 Increasing amount of borrowing despite of its consistent profitability came from following reasons. First is the firm’s financial position. As sales have increased by 60% from 1993-1995, the assets that support increase of sales increased…

Words: 1272 - Pages: 6

Financial Analysis and forcasting Monica fernandes som 101 November 9, 2004 Prof. Pierre du jardin Mr. George Dodge, Clarkson Lumber Company is doing well but there is the issue of whether or not there is too high a risk in granting the request for the \$750,000 line of credit. There are many supporting strong points but it also has some problems to work out. This is a company that has many good characteristics and looks promising but needs the extra money to pay off loans, inventory,…

Words: 2283 - Pages: 10
• ###### Essay about Solutions Account Cost-Horngren-Datar-Y-Foster.

could be a sign of efficient management. Alternatively, it could be due to using lower quality materials (which in turn adversely affected unit volume). 7-5 7-19 (30 min.) Flexible budget, working backward. 1. Variance Analysis for The Clarkson Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 FlexibleActual Budget Results Variances (1) (2)=(1) (2)=(1)(3) 130,000 0 \$715,000 \$260,000 F 515,000 255,000 U 200,000 5,000 F 140,000 20,000 U \$ 60,000 \$ 15,000 U Flexible Budget (3) 130,000 \$455,000a…

Words: 233816 - Pages: 936
• ###### Hehehhe Essay

The New Stakeholder View,” California Management Review 45, no. 1 (Fall 2002): 6–28; and Peter Fritsch and Timothy Mapes,“Seed Money; In Indonesia, A Tangle of Bribes Creates Trouble for Monsanto,” The Wall Street Journal, April 5, 2005. Max B. E. Clarkson,“A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance,” Academy of Management Review 20, no. 1 (1995): 92–117. C. K. Prahalad and S. L. Hart, “The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid,” Strategy + Business 26 (2006):…

Words: 395294 - Pages: 1582