Bill Of Rights Vs Civil Liberties

Amazing Essays
A person’s civil rights guarantee, by the government, the right to be free from unequal treatment based on certain protected characteristics (race, gender, disability) in settings such as employment and housing. An example of a civil right is that of U.S citizens who qualify having the right to vote and do so and that might be enforceable by the government intervention. In contrast, civil liberties are limitations on government power designed to` protect our fundamental freedoms. Civil liberties are basic rights and freedoms that are guaranteed either by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, or interpreted by lawmakers or courts through the years. Civil liberties are typically seen as being limitations on government power, intended to protect …show more content…
It guarantees both the right to express your views in public and religious freedom. The amendment can be broken up into two major parts. The first portion of the amendment focuses on religious freedom protecting people from having a set of religious beliefs imposed by the government on them. Furthermore, it protects people from having their own religious beliefs restricted by government authorities. The establishment clause is known as the first of these two freedoms. This clause prohibits Congress from creating or promoting a state-sponsored religion for its people. In broader terms the clause has forbidden the creation of a “Church of Ohio” or “Church of the United States but also forbids the government from favoring religion over non-religion or one set of religious beliefs over others. The guarantee given to citizens that they have a right to practice whatever religion they please is a protection against government action. Thus, making it a civil liberty. In contrast, the free …show more content…
This conversation has been a frequently talked about topic because of the actions of the NFL quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers, Colin Keapernick. In refusing to stand for the playing of the national anthem in protest of what he deems are wrongdoings against African Americans and minorities in the United States. This high profile quarterback has taken matters in to his own hands and used this platform to voice his opinions and open the eyes of the citizens regarding the U.S. government and its unfairness. In a statement issued to NFL Media in an after game interview, Kaepernick said, “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color.” “To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder.” No later than on September 1, 2016, Colin Keapernick took a knee during the pledge of allegiance in a televised NFL game against the Green Bay Packers. This event has caused many exchanges in thoughts and opinions from the media mass, public and many fans. After Thursday 's game, Keapernick spoke up in an interview to the media about his reasons for not taking part in the pledge of allegiance. The reasons Keapernick gave the media for his kneeling was, 1. The oppression of people of colors 2

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In a civil society it is generally understood that people posses the right to many individual freedoms, including the freedom of speech. In liberal democracies these rights are protected by governments through social contract and consent to be governed. A conflict that generally arises with freedom of speech is: how far can freedom of speech go? In many realms of socio-political debate the idea of free speech versus hate speech is often brought to attention. In a liberal democratic society freedom of speech must be allowed to the fullest extent so long as it does not harm the individual rights of others.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ali Mithani Mithani 1 Professor Sharifan GOVT 2305 10/5/17 Liberties or Rights? “Civil Liberties” specifically means the rights that are endowed by the Bill of rights, constitution, and any following cases or legislation. “Civil Rights” on the other hand is meant to make sure that fair, and equal treatment exists against separating factors like race, gender, sexual preferences, interalia. These are similar in the respect that they have both come to being to maintain rights against unfair treatment. In the case of civil liberties, they were made more so for the protection against government which may become tyrannical.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Currently in society, same-sex marriage is also dealt with in regards to our freedoms guaranteed by The United States Constitution. As stated previously, the government cannot deny someone of their Civil Liberties. However, as this issue has become increasingly prominent, it has been established that while the right to marry is a Civil Liberty, same-sex marriage is a Civil Rights matter. In conclusion, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties aid each other in regulating the rights and freedoms of citizens in The United States. Each sets of freedoms have similarities as well as differences.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Civil liberties are fundamental human rights that the government cannot control and provides people protection from the government. On the other hand, civil rights are obligations required by civil society for civil participation to be achieved and require the government to be a part of in order to function properly. The difference between a civil liberty and a civil right is a civil liberty is a protection from the government and is considered to be natural privilege, however, a civil right involves the government to work with the people and is a civil duty. An example of a civil liberty would be the freedom of religion which means the government cannot control what religion is practiced by society protecting the people from the government controlling the people. An example of a civil right would be the right to vote as it requires government involvement in order to function properly and is considered to be a civil duty meaning you should vote as you need to be involved in your government.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unalienable Rights Essay

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    These rights include the freedom of religion, the freedom of the press, and the freedom to property. The freedom of religion was added to the first amendment for a variety of reasons, each vital to both the rights of the individual and the safety from tyranny that the bill of rights guarantees. Often, it is this simple, unalienable right that causes so much debate, as some would find a religion objectionable, and it is both the right and responsibility of the Supreme Court to settle matters regarding the Constitution. There is a multitude of cases tried by the Supreme Court that deal with this very problem, with cases about what constitutes a religion, infringements on the rights of religious practitioners, as well as numerous…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The import of Griswold and Roe is that privacy rights are also libertarian claims. This implies that the right to privacy is one of the liberties guaranteed to American citizens by the Fourteenth Amendment. Its identification as a liberty claim means that federal governments and states cannot violate this understanding of privacy without infringing the clause that calls for due process for the…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His standpoint is that the government should not interfere with people’s lives unless it is to prevent harm to another person. He sees this as the only time the government can legitimately interfere with an individual’s liberty. Mill believes people should have the freedom to do whatever actions they wish to themselves when he states “His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant.” (Mill, 13). Mill does not view something as extreme as an individual harming themselves as grounds for the government to restrict a person’s liberty. This argument from Mill is conflictive with present day society with many laws in place to protect individuals from harming themselves.…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The difference between negative and positive forms of freedom can also been seen as a clash between liberalism and communitarianism. Liberalism seeks to establish universal rights in order to protect the individual and allow them autonomy in choosing what is best for their lives (Passavant p13). In contrast,…

    • 1119 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Negative Equality

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negative Liberty Should Be Pursued Although liberty and equality harbour contrasting ideals, one concept can essentially deliver the provisions of both by prioritizing one over the other. Of the various forms of equality, modern day civilization thrives for equality of rights. This brand of equality endeavors to create a society where all citizens are equal and provided with the same opportunities. Though not entirely different, liberty upholds the belief that each person should have freedom to do as they please. Specifically, negative liberty demands freedom sans barriers, obstacles, constraints and other socially and politically bindings that can restrict a person’s autonomy.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is a feeling of independence or freedom. It is having the choice…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays