Circuit Court Case Summary

Improved Essays
The claimants argued that the defendant intentionally interfered the contract he had with his employer and was behind his termination. The law gives greater protection for someone with an existing contract and no one time the law will tolerate for a third party to interfere an existing contract and later entice one of the party to breach its contract. Due to that, the defendants intentionally interfered the claimant’s contract without any justification and used improper means to terminate the claimant’s contract. Because of that, the appeal court accepted the claimant’s arguments and reverse the circuit court’s decision by ordering it to perform further investigation regarding the case. On the other hand, the claimant’s second claim which was anti-trust law, must indicate that the defendants conduct had led the claimants to suffer from a damage. Failure for the claimants to provide such evidence means that his claims will be invalid and the court will affirm the circuit court’s decision. The arguments of the claimant was that the defendants make an excluded contract with the current cardiac surgeon, and that prevents him and all other non-contractual workers from performing service in the hospital. Therefore, loss of employment cannot be a valid reason that supports his claim of anti-trust, du to that the court affirm the circuit court’s decision and rejecting the defendant’s claim. …show more content…
Improper purpose involves using false information in order to damage the reputation of a highly respected person. Moreover, the plaintiff must suffer a damage like termination from his employers as a result of the defendant’s intentional interference. On the hand, all opinions are not regarded as facts unless it can be verified through continuous

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The main issue for this case is whether or not Dr. Baugh and Dr. Feldman’s noncompete agreements with Colombia Heart were in fact enforceable. Originally, on the trial court level, they agreed with the doctors in their suit against Colombia Heart, stating that the noncompete provision was unenforceable, and their actions were admissable. Colombia Heart brought it up on appeals. The case was ultimately reversed in their favor, as on appeal they disagreed and found that the noncompete agreements were actually enforceable, and that the doctors were in the wrong, and that they were not able to go and practice on their own due to the agreements they had as shareholders. I find this to be really interesting actually.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    MILLERSBURG — A local woman was arrested Wednesday after she allegedly conspired with a Millersburg man to assault and restrain her boyfriend, preventing him from leaving an apartment at which they were staying temporarily. Jamie L. Spears, 26, who is currently without a permanent address, is charged in Holmes County Municipal Court with abduction and domestic violence. The abduction charge is a third-degree felony punishable by up to three years in prison. Spears, who remains incarcerated in the Holmes County Jail, with bond set at $10,000, is next scheduled to appear in court for a Feb. 23 preliminary hearing.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Facts of the Case: During a group game of basketball between Jason Shelley and Mario Gonzalez, Jason Shelley deliberately punched Mr. Gonazalez in the jaw. The two had been very aggressive towards one another throughout the entire game. Gonzalez’s jaw was broken and his injury required emergency surgery. Gonzalez’s jaw also had to be wired shut causing him tremendous pain, greatly impacting the quality and productivity of life.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Experience,” was the message Susan Theall voiced at a forum held at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette Tuesday afternoon. Theall and Vanessa Anseman were initially scheduled to debate but Anseman was not able attended after a district judge Alonzo Harris ruled Monday she was ineligible said moderator Ian Auzenne who is the vice president of the Acadiana Press Club. “Yesterday district judge Alonzo Harris of St. Landry parish ruled Anseman was ineligible to run,” he said. “Anseman filed an appeal on his ruling and because the appeal is a lengthy process she will not be able to attend.”…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Us Vs Pachon Case Summary

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pachon-Pachon mischaracterized evidence of duress as evidence of necessity. The district court correctly disallowed his use of the necessity…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student protestors of Gallaudet University presented the Gallaudet University Board of Trustees with four demands: 1. The resignation of the newly appointed university president Elizabeth Zinser, a hearing person, and the selection of a Deaf person as the universities president. 2. The immediate resignation of Jane Basset Spilman, who was chair of the Board of Trustees. 3.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Essay

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Title and Citation: Fry V. Napoleon Community School District Topic: A school district denying the student the right to have a service dog attend school. Level or Type of Court: Supreme Court- Oct 2016 Facts of the Case: A student with cerebral palsy obtained a service dog with the doctor’s approval to help her live as independent as possible. The service dog was hypo-allergenic and was to stay out of the way when not needed.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An abnormality is a medically cognizable condition Lindblad v. Boeing 108 Wash.App.198, 31 P.3d 1 (2001). Toledo was medically diagnosed with a right shoulder cuff tear and fits the description of a disabled person thus meets the first prong in the prima facie case. Toledo is in a protected class. 2) Adverse Employment Action: The adverse action on the part of Custom Apple Packers is evident in the termination of Toledo while she was under orders to be on light-duty work due to her injury suffered on the job that left her with a short term disability. 3) Satisfactory Work: There is no mention that Toledo’s performance was anything less than satisfactory up to and during her on the job injury.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. The court will likely find Humphrey entrusted the truck to Haley under Alabama common law. “When one person drives a car belonging to another, a rebuttable presumption of entrustment... arise when ownership is established ” Edwards v. Valentine, 926 So. 2d 315, 320 (Ala. 2005).…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kentucky Court Case

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Background: In Lexington, KY, police were conducting an undercover operation to catch someone selling crack cocaine. The seller was being sold out by an undercover informant. When the suspect fled the scene after catching a glimpse of the cops he ran around a corner and into an apartment building causing the cops to lose sight of him. The cops knocked on the door of one apartment and heard people moving around and entered the apartment because the smell of marijuana came through the door.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Name of the Case: Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748, 2005. 2. Facts: After her divorce, Jessica Gonzales was granted a restraining order against her ex-husband by a state trial court in Colorado. The restraining order prohibited the ex-husband from disturbing Ms. Gonzales and her three daughters and ordered him to stay at least 100 yards away from the family home. The ex-husband / father was granted visits with his children on alternating weekends, for two weeks in the summer and for occasional mid-week visits if prearranged between the parents.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Non-Compete Agreement

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To show that a non-compete agreement is unreasonably written it cannot protect the legitimate interests of the employer, provide an undue hardship on the employee, or injure public interest. Tech. Aid Corp. v. Allen, 591 A.2d 262, 266 (N.H. 1991). The employer had a legitimate interest…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of EEOC Vs. Federal Express

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    The harassment continued and the whole building, not just the tenant was taken away from her route. The courts ruled in favor of the employees even though the company had taken action to end the harassment. The courier was awarded due to the fact that no replacement building was given to her, which resulted in a loss of pay. The court stated that she was ? in effect, punished for her…

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Daniels’s memorandum, he argues that a trial court granted a general contractor’s motion for summary judgment because a general contractor has no duty of care to the injured party. Williams v. Nucor-Yamato Steel Col., 886 S.W.2d 587, 587 (Ark. 1994). This argument would be compelling but for a lack of evidence in the record reflecting Bolanos’s status as an independent contractor. In fact, the only evidence that supports Daniels’s assertion is his own affidavit. Deferring consideration of Daniels’s motion until after Bolanos and Daniels are deposed will “provide an additional safeguard against an improvident or premature grant of summary judgment.”…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gm Case

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ♣ to the audit committee, as in the GM case. NYSE requirements require the audit committee to discuss policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. However, the NYSE commentary clarifies that the “audit committee is not required to be the sole body responsible for risks assessment and management” [See Part I, Exhibit C Rule 303A.07(b)(iii)(D)].…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays