Causes And Controversies Of The Dawes Act

Improved Essays
Issue and Controversies in American History
Dawes Act
Americans believed in 1840, that they had to move westward; although the land was taken by the Native Americans. The Dawes Act, was a way to end the conflict between white settlers and the Indians; by giving the Indians and settlers their own plots of land. After the American Revolution white settlers continued to come to the New World, taking more from the natives for ranches, railroads, mining interest, as well as their own needs, causing the natives to have to move farther west. The government sought out to resolve the issue by giving the Indians large pieces of lands called reservations. Whites weren’t allowed to trespass on the land. Indian wars broke out between the natives and the
…show more content…
By providing the groups with the amount of land they needed, to prevent settlers for trespassing and taking the Indians’ land. Although Texas Senator Richard Coke insisted that whites would still try to take the Indians land no matter the amount of land they were given. Also he stated it was impossible to have peace between the two, because the amount of land the Indians were given on the reservations. The settlers outnumbered the natives and greedily wanted more land; without the bill the Indians would have no chance against the settlers, who were determined to take the land for themselves. The allotment bill ensured that the Indians would be provided enough land to survive on. Supporters of the allotment pointed out how the natives didn’t use all the land they were given, but only a small portion. Although Secretary of the Interior Carl Schurz said that “the Indians, with their possessions, will cease to stand in the way of the development of the …show more content…
One day life is absolutely normal, the next these strange intruders come onto the land that your grandfather’s grandfather was raised on, the land your family had hunted and lived on since anyone could possibly remember. The strange people are telling you, that you and your family have to move to another area, to make room for more strange faces to take your land. To raise their children, were your children were going to raise theirs. What right did the settlers have coming onto land that was already taken, homes were already built. The American’s came to the New World to escape from a government that was taking what was rightfully theirs, but began to take what was rightfully someone else’s. Settlers left their home, because their previous government was taxing them, giving them acts and laws to follow that were unfair, but it was okay for them to travel somewhere new and do the same to the people who lived on the land. Indians survived on their ways of life for centuries before the settlers came to the new land, why would they need to change their ways because of the ideas of the settlers. The settlers wanted the Indians to be, live and act like them. Abandoning their ways and beliefs. The settlers and government should have left the Native Americans to themselves, they were educated as well as civilized in their own way, without the help of the Americans. Natives were communal people, living together,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For this essay, I will be examining the Dawes Act, the Homestead Act, and the Morrill Act. The Dawes Act, Homestead Act, and the Morrill all have similar aspects in them. During this essay, a comparison will be made between all three of these acts. Also, each act has different principles that are important to its fundamentals. Those different principles will be examined also.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dawes Act Dbq Analysis

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On February 8, 1887, Congress passed the Dawes Act as a solution to the "Indian Problem." Congress saw this conflict similar to Americans Richard H. Pratt and Carl Schurz, who noticed the Westward Expansion campaign had become an invasion for Native Americans. Both men believed the Natives must integrate into western society, that they must "individualize them in the possession and appreciation of property," Schurz claimed. Mr. Pratt had seen the harsh conditions of Native reservations himself and concluded they were in desperate need of education. Together with other Indian reformers, Pratt pushed Congress to feed Great Plains Native Americans into American Indian schools, where they would "kill the Indian, save the man.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dawes Act Dbq

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The event that most affectedly brought the end to the Indian Wars against the United States Army, is when the Congress passed the Dawes Act. Due to many arguments facing the government, like, the concept that many reformers inferred about the dream of conforming the Indians into a piece of the white culture. The Dawes Act, divided reservations into around 160 acres per family to live in, where the remainder of land would be given to the surrounding white settlements. Although, the Dawes Act seemed like a great benefit for the Indians, this could not always be considered true.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dawes Severalty Act which is also known as the General Allotment Act was passed on February 8, 1887 by Congress and signed my President Grover Cleveland. Congress stated the goals of the Act, “were simple and clear cut: to extinguish tribal sovereignty, erase reservation boundaries, and force the assimilation of Indians into the society at large.” The Act required Native Americans to be give up their land and be relocated in return for individual land grants. The Dawes Act divided Indian reservations into smaller sections allowing more protection for the United States over Indian territories. The goal of dividing up the reservations were to help Native Americans integrate into American society and create independent landholders which would cause tribes to break up and become more independent.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But the government sent in the army to force tribes to move. The US government gave them land in Oklahoma. but the natives refused to leave. They didn't want to live in Oklahoma. They wanted to live in the land where their elders grew up where they had always lived.…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. This gave the federal government the right to force the Cherokee nation into giving up all of its land east of the Mississippi River. The plan was for the Native Americans to migrate west to an area that today is known as Oklahoma. The Indians negotiated with the government for reimbursement of their ancestor’s hard work and investments. The government would give them $5 million for all of their land east of the Mississippi River, along with $500,000 to help with transportation west and to compensate the native landowners.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How can hospitality be expected by a guest who barges in and demands to take control? If hospitality is present in such situations, it will prove to be destructive. Similarly, when European explorers entered the New World, they discovered Native Americans, who had already been living in the Americas for several centuries. Undoubtedly, these indigenous people’s lifestyles were influenced by the climate, resources, and geography of this land. As the European explorers began to settle in the New World, the Federal Government played a major role in not only the Europeans’ lives but also the Native Americans’ lives.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Native American Policies during the Gilded Age Anthony Ciccariello 01 May 2016 HIST407 D001 American Military University Since the North American continent was discovered and inhabited by Europeans there was a distance or gap of misunderstanding between the settlers and the indigenous people. This distance and difference in way of life did not end after the inhabitants created their own country and won their independence from the Great Britain. The American government and the people of the United States began treating Native Americans differently in the years following the Revolutionary War, as westward expansion became more and more important.…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America was slowly signing treaties with the Natives, but people wanted a faster answer to the removal of the tribes. The Indian Removal Act was passed to hasten the process of removal, and many nations ceded their lands . (Indian Removal Act) Mr. Jackson claimed that separating the Natives and putting them on reservations actually helped them from the whites. The Cherokees tried stopping the removal process by pointing at Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and Worcester v. Georgia, but Jackson remarked “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.” (Kurtz)…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During 1865-1900’s, Western Expansion caused major impacts on the Natives Americans and European Americans. Natives were slowly being wiped out due to the powerful challenges caused by the colonist and the conflict between cultural arrogance such as the natives being primitive and the European Americans thought of being superior. It causes cultural issues that led to Reservation Systems which the U.S. Government forced Native Americans tribes to live in certain areas. This act caused rebellious plans such as the Dakota Sioux Uprising of 1862, the Dawes Act of 1887 and Geronimo. Another major conflict were the issues with land, trade, medicine and cultural differences such as the Ghost Dance, even though some Natives accepted the Treaty Process,…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although these Native Americans were civilized, Andrew Jackson still wanted to move them away from the East. Some tribes relocated with few problems while other tribes, like the Cherokee and the Seminoles, did not relocate west without a fight. The Cherokee took the case to the Supreme Court where the Court favored the Native Americans and agreed that they deserved the right to stay on the land because it was…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An Analysis and History of Native American Injustices Everyone in the U.S. grows up learning about Columbus, Thanksgiving, and the British colonies. Meanwhile all that many are taught about the indigenous peoples is that the “savages” showed the Europeans how to farm, there was a good harvest, and then they lived happily ever after. A majority of people doesn’t know what the history teachers leave out. The Europeans came to the Americas not just to explore but instead to profit from its resources. Also it was the Ancient Siberians – the ancestors of the Native Americans – who found the Americas, not Columbus or Leif Erikson.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokee’s did not agree to this act because they believed that they were no threat to the white settlements. Due to the tribe being very well educated they decided to go to the Supreme Court with their case. The U.S. Government used treaties as one means to displace Indians from their tribal lands, a method that was strengthened with the Removal Act of 1830, but in some cases the government violated both treaties and Supreme Court rulings to help the spread of Americans westward. On May 28, 1830 Andrew was granted the power to exchange native land east of the Mississippi with land to the west.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “...the Cherokee people would have to surrender something fundamental: either the land they had lived on for thousands of years or their very identity as Cherokees living under their own sovereign government. ”(Smith 4). As illustrated by this quote, the natives did not have much of a choice in leaving, either they gave up their culture, independence, and completely changed their way of life, or they gave up their land. The Native Americans would be killed by colonists who wanted their land and sacrifice their family and tribe, or they could leave peacefully.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays