Cardozo & Co., Inc.: Case Study

Improved Essays
Questions Presented
I am being sued by investors in Cardozo & Co., Inc. who invested in the IPO, and others who invested in anticipation of the proposed merger. He is also being sued by Prosser bank who relied on Cardozo & Co., Inc 's proxy statements to issue them a loan. What common and statutory liabilities I and what accountant client privilege does he have?
Brief Answer
Under common law I would be found liable for negligence to the investors in Cardozo & Co., Inc. but not to Prosser Bank. He will also be found liable to Investors under the Securities act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Professional-client privilege would not enable me to refuse to respond to a subpoena from a government agency and the working papers
…show more content…
I did find several irregular entries that he suspected to be bribes but he took no action regarding the information.
I also rendered tax advice concerning tax shelters in the Cayman Islands to the firm 's president. In addition, he prepared financials or the proxy statements that were filed with the SEC In anticipation with the merger. The proxy statements were used by Prosser bank without my knowledge) to secure a loan for Cardozo & Co., Inc. It was revealed that Cardozo & Co., Inc 's President had been siphoning money from the company, while still making the company look profitable. This caused the merger deal to collapse and the company to border on insolvency and Prosser bank to be unable to collect loan proceeds.
The company is under investigation by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the Intenrnal Revenue Service (IRS), the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), the Florida Attorney General and the Florida Department of Revenue. Reginald Varghese was told by the new company president not to obey any summons or subpoenas by these governmental agencies. I am currently being sued by investors at the time of the IPO and those who invested in anticipation of the proposed mergers and also by Prosser Bank who is suing for their
…show more content…
The investor would have to prove that they relied on the information but they don’t have to prove that it was the defendants fault. The defense for this would be good faith (acting without scienter)that I had no knowledge that the statement was false or misleading. I had no idea about the overstating of the net sales and net profits or the siphoning of profits by the company President, but he did notice suspicious entries he believed to be bribes that he didn’t investigate further. (Mallor, 2010, p. 1202)
b. Reginald Varghese would not be found liable under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 act.
Rule 10b-5 bars any person from making a misstatement or omission of material fact in relation to the purchase or sale of any security. The wrongful act was in association with the national securities exchange, which is one of the requirements of Rule 10b-5. A purchaser of a security is able to sue an auditor who has misstated or omitted a material fact without requiring privity. The defendant must have acted with scienter, intent to deceive, which isn’t the case in this situation therefore I wouldn’t be found liable under Rule 10b-5. (Mallor, 2010, p. 1202)
IV. I wouldn 't be able to allege accountant-client privilege to ignore the subpoenas from the government

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    That’s just not how the American government was set up to work. An argument that proponents of the bailout is that all of this could be done lawfully by using commerce power. “To legitimately invoke the commerce power, Congress must show not only that a federal program is necessary, but also that it is proper-that is, the program does not violate other foundational principles, such as federalism, separation of powers, and limited government. Congress has not made that showing.” In conclusion, not only are corporate bailouts unconstitutional, there illegal and these bailouts should have…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If it was done, there should not have been bankruptcy and other events leading to the closure of the company. SAS99 insisted on the consideration of the fraud in a financial statement audit but does not require it to occur in the statement. It is required as per the part of the protocol; the internal auditors should show sufficient professional expertise in critical evaluation of the financial statements and with skepticism. SAS 99 emphasizes that the internal control mechanism and the auditors should take risk of fraud, and should adapt the audit based on the skeptism and the findings. The mechanism of noticing the fraud detection hotline is absent in the Kmart.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Arthur Andersen to regularly give a company like BFA copies of its audited financials, which are then distributed to investors, is a dubious practice. It should probably not be allowed, on the grounds that Arthur Andersen essentially incurs a conflict of interest: It obtains further revenue through the company whose financials are in question if it provides clean audits, but not otherwise. It seems that the suit would not specifically mention the provision that the auditing firm made with respect to the financials, if BFA were legally allowed to do so…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If the auditor fails to convey reliable information to the client by not executing a quality audit of the company’s financial statements in accordance with GAAS, that authors argue that he/she is ordinarily liable for compensatory damages and consequential damages, such as the costs the client will incur to hire an alternate auditor to complete the work (Mallor et al. 1189). The numerous inexactitudes present within Cardozo & Co.’s financial statements, which I failed to detect, serve as a testament to the fact that I did not perform a quality audit in accordance with GAAS. I failed to reasonably assure my client that the company’s financial statements were presented fairly in accordance with GAAP and not materially misstated. I failed to uncover the president’s embezzlement scheme and perform my due diligence in regards to the “irregular” entries.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Corporations don’t have minds, body and soul; they can’t be imprisoned or rehabilitated. In order to find someone guilty of criminal liability, you need mens rea, the intention behind the act. Corporations don’t have intentions, their officers do. Corporations also can’t be held responsible for the crimes of other people since they have no way of fully controlling each and every one of their employees. If an employee acts with his freewill against the corporate policy and negligently harms another person, the Corporation should not face any liability because that is unjust.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kozlowski, Swartz, and Belnick were all accused of selling their stock without informing shareholders, which under the Securities and Exchange Commission is a requirement. The Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC), the Manhattan D.A. and Tyco all pursued cases against Kozlowski, Swartz, and other former corporate officials on various charges which included: fraud, grand larceny, and falsifying regulatory filings. The SEC originally began an investigation on Tyco in 1999 after an analyst reported questionable accounting practices (SEC). The investigation revolved around the suspicious accounting principles of the company’s acquisitions, including a practice known as “spring-loading” (Forbes).…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the reasons for why the courts enforce secret trusts can be explained by the fraud theory. Fraud theory is based on the maxim that “equity will not permit a statute to be used as an instrument of fraud”. [8] Equity will not permit the secret trustee to keep the property fraudulently to themselves relying on failing to comply with Wills Act’s requirements such as the terms not in signed writing, but instead will ensure them to hold the property on trust. [8] In this context, “fraud” should be understood as failing to give effect to the final intention of the testator by the secret trustee who has promised to carry out the trust obligation but then frustrate testator’s wishes and sacrifice the interest of the secret beneficiaries. In this…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Barings Bank Case Study

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Barings top management less familiar business proprietary problem (transaction for his own interests). If Barings Auditors and top management understands the business of trading, they would know that it is impossible for Leeson obtained a profit of which he reported, if not taking greater risk anyway. And of course top management and Auditors questioning where the origin of the spider. Lack of knowledge about the trading Barings business is indeed justified in considering the most senior Barings managers have a background of merchant banking. The members of the Assetand Liability Committee (ALCO), which monitors market risk, stated it's a matter of quantity of positions taken Leeson, but later felt comfortable with the thought that eksposure Barings over market risk is relatively small because Leeson over the hedgethe position.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parol Evidence Rule

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    425, 433 (1999). Stated differently, parol evidence cannot be used to add or alter the terms of a completely integrated contract, but it can be used to define ambiguous terms. Likewise, “[i]t is well settled that the parol evidence rule does not prevent the introduction of parol evidence indicating that the written instrument was not to become effective as an instrument, until a prior condition or event had occurred.” Foreman, supra, 257 Md. at 442. “Parol evidence is admissible, therefore, to show that a writing never became effective as a contract or that it was void or voidable.” Tricat Indus., Inc. v. Harper, 131 Md.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Partnership Case Study

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We ask ourselves the question; did Rob, Ned, Lulu and Mr. Moneybags have implied authority to grant Romulus to enter into contract with Santa Rita Bank and Bank of Money? Implied authority is authority which a court concludes that the principle partners intended to give to the` other partners even though they did not use any words that would confer such authority. To determine if people who have not specifically agreed to become partners are nevertheless partners, the court will look at any relevant evidence to determine what the intent of the parties is. If the court finds out that a person is entitled to a share of the business’ profits then it will be presumed that such a person is a partner in that business even if there is no express agreement. This presumption however, is rebuttable upon providing evidence that a person received his share for some reasons other than being a co-owner of the business.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays