Cardozo & Co., Inc.: Case Study

Improved Essays
Questions Presented
I am being sued by investors in Cardozo & Co., Inc. who invested in the IPO, and others who invested in anticipation of the proposed merger. He is also being sued by Prosser bank who relied on Cardozo & Co., Inc 's proxy statements to issue them a loan. What common and statutory liabilities I and what accountant client privilege does he have?
Brief Answer
Under common law I would be found liable for negligence to the investors in Cardozo & Co., Inc. but not to Prosser Bank. He will also be found liable to Investors under the Securities act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Professional-client privilege would not enable me to refuse to respond to a subpoena from a government agency and the working papers
…show more content…
I did find several irregular entries that he suspected to be bribes but he took no action regarding the information.
I also rendered tax advice concerning tax shelters in the Cayman Islands to the firm 's president. In addition, he prepared financials or the proxy statements that were filed with the SEC In anticipation with the merger. The proxy statements were used by Prosser bank without my knowledge) to secure a loan for Cardozo & Co., Inc. It was revealed that Cardozo & Co., Inc 's President had been siphoning money from the company, while still making the company look profitable. This caused the merger deal to collapse and the company to border on insolvency and Prosser bank to be unable to collect loan proceeds.
The company is under investigation by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the Intenrnal Revenue Service (IRS), the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), the Florida Attorney General and the Florida Department of Revenue. Reginald Varghese was told by the new company president not to obey any summons or subpoenas by these governmental agencies. I am currently being sued by investors at the time of the IPO and those who invested in anticipation of the proposed mergers and also by Prosser Bank who is suing for their
…show more content…
The investor would have to prove that they relied on the information but they don’t have to prove that it was the defendants fault. The defense for this would be good faith (acting without scienter)that I had no knowledge that the statement was false or misleading. I had no idea about the overstating of the net sales and net profits or the siphoning of profits by the company President, but he did notice suspicious entries he believed to be bribes that he didn’t investigate further. (Mallor, 2010, p. 1202)
b. Reginald Varghese would not be found liable under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 act.
Rule 10b-5 bars any person from making a misstatement or omission of material fact in relation to the purchase or sale of any security. The wrongful act was in association with the national securities exchange, which is one of the requirements of Rule 10b-5. A purchaser of a security is able to sue an auditor who has misstated or omitted a material fact without requiring privity. The defendant must have acted with scienter, intent to deceive, which isn’t the case in this situation therefore I wouldn’t be found liable under Rule 10b-5. (Mallor, 2010, p. 1202)
IV. I wouldn 't be able to allege accountant-client privilege to ignore the subpoenas from the government

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Although Madoff was very sly in his conn efforts, if the people around him performed their duties, as they should, he may not have gotten away with the scheme for so long. It is incorrect to believe that just because the auditors were provided with false information, they are not also liable for overlooking any such discrepancies that should raise awareness. Even the Wall Street Journal made reference to the auditors, specifically stating that it is important when considering making an investment to look into the actual accounting firm that performs audits and whether they are a recognized firm with a strong reputation (Stewart) hinting that because Madoff’s books were audited by an unknown firm, allowing him to take control of the scene forcing the odds in his favor. From this, it can be inferred that if Madoff or one of his investors had gone with a reputable accounting firm to audit the material, discrepancies would surface, and therefore Madoff would not have gotten off with his scheme for so long. In fact, after the scheme had surfaced and the truth was revealed, Scott Berman, an attorney at Freidman Kaplan Seiler * Adelman made a comment with regards to the auditors.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lawsuit has been filed on behalf of all people who purchased or acquired Pacific Coast Oil Trust (PCOT) securities that became effective on May 2, 2012 and September 19, 2013. It is alleged that PCOT violated federal securities laws in its disclosures. The disclosures issued are believed to misrepresent its business, operations, and prospects. More specifically, it is claimed that the statements are misleading regarding PCOT’s capital expenditures and hedge contracts (Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP). PCOT announced its Secondary offering on September 18, 2013.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Fact: Vanderbilling Equity Fund buys shares totaling over 10 million and XYZ bank lends HOLO based on the financial reports. Six months later, when the embezzlement and cover-up are revealed, the stock prices of HOLO drop drastically, Vanderbilling Equity Fund and XYZ filed lawsuits. b. Issue: Were Doug, Sam, Tony, PPW, and HOLO liable for this lawsuits? c. Answer: Yes d. Rationale: 1.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case involves three parties Romanelli Inc. as principal, Schor accountant and financial adviser as agent and Citibank as a third party. It must be decided whom is liability for actions made by Schor. This case addresses the following legal issues; Authority, Authority branch of agency law, Criminal Law, Third Party Liability, and Vicariously Tort Liability. Relevant social issues involved. Standards must be in place to aid society.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since my decision that Indiana would join the multi-state legal challenge to the new federal health care law, many Hoosiers have called or e-mailed my office with questions. Let me now explain why Indiana had to join the challenge. Since my decision that Indiana would join the multi-state legal challenge to the new federal health care law, many Hoosiers have called or e-mailed my office with questions. Let me now explain why Indiana had to join the challenge.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the particular case, there is one side that will have the court predominantly in their favor. In the case of Check Investors being the defendant and the Federal Trade Commission representing the debtors being the plaintiff. There are many violations that the FTC can bring against Check Investors. The most apparent one is Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress due to the comments and threats that they made to those that they were attempting to collect from.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the case, we know that the Imclone company was almost destroyed due to the conspiracy of Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic. The fact is that, in 2001, 28th 0f December, SEC rejected the approval of a kind of medicine. However, before this big day, CEO and her stockbroker sold their stock, making the share price plunged. Thus, Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic were convicted of conspiracy, making false statement and interfere with a public function. At the same time, Lawrence Stewart, an expert witness, committed perjury in his testimony.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Grace case are 2060: Reporting to Senior Management and 2440: Disseminating Results. 2060 discusses the requirement of the chief audit executive to “include [all] significant risk exposures and control issues, including fraud risks, governance issues, and other matters” when reporting to “senior management and the board (Textbook).” Mr. Eatough purposefully evaded reporting an issue of fraud by downgrading the severity of the company’s situation and avoiding the use of the word fraud altogether in his final report to the CFO.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PCAOB Lawsuit

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are a lot of many different companies in many different industries across the globe. One of those industries is the accounting industry. Which has many different careers and titles; there is tax accountants, forensic accountants, financial advisors, and auditors. This essay will discuss what the PCAOB does, some consequences if firms do not do their audit correctly, a recent lawsuit, and what they did in result after the lawsuit. Like other accounting firms, the PCAOB has several duties.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Reform

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When activists, citizens, and others made pleas for prosecuting the companies who were manipulating information and committing investor fraud, Congress enacted a corporate reform law (130). This law placed heavy requirements on companies while ignoring those who failed in regulating the previous companies. While the corporate reforms did improve the companies superficially, the only way to actually improve a company is moral reform. There are three principles that summarize corporate reform. Transparency is the first: that the company will “conduct business and make decisions with integrity, honesty, and input from investors.”…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Menendez, the whistleblower wasn’t included in the important meeting that Halliburton arranged. Throughout the meeting, KPMG was present without the employee Menendez. This meeting held the fact that there would be an accounting topic of a joint venture. However, SEC would find reasons in awkward situations considering KPMG and why they shouldn’t have had been in the RTA meeting consulted by Haliburton. KPMG’s profession and influence can impact the way that the shareholders’ opinion can react up at the end.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fiduciary Duty Essay

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this case, the directors of a company arrived at the share price for a leveraged buy-out merger without consulting the Company’s and independent financial experts. The directors also failed to determine the company’s total value before the merger. The directors of the company were found to have been grossly negligent in the manner in which they handled the merger. Even though the share price arrived by the directors proved to be profitable for the company, the court maintained that the directors had failed to exercise their duty of care because they had failed to consult any financial experts when arriving at their decision (Macey,…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stratton Oakmont, Inc. was a Long Island, New York based "over-the-counter” brokerage company founded by Jordan Belfort. Stratton Oakmont is one of the well known and most controversial stock scandal of all times. Jordan Belfort also known as “wolf of wall street” was a stockbroker who ended up doing a big stock manipulation. He looted his clients by underwriting an initial public offer(IPO) for a company that doesn’t exist then they used pump and dump scheme to sell its self-owned stocks by giving false and positive statements so that they can sell the low-priced stocks at higher prices. Once an opened, company artificially manipulated the price of the share, since they had virtually all the shares.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Enron Scandal Summary

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ian D Johnson Jb Henriksen Accounting 2600 11/1/17 Case Presentation: Enron Scandal Before the scandal that Enron is widely known for today, they were an up and coming American energy company led by CEO Kenneth Lay. In 1985, Lay helped to merge two natural gas companies known as Houston Natural gas and InterNorth to form Enron. Soon after, Congress approved legislation that deregulated the sale of natural gas, allowing companies to use the free market to sell energy. The company became a national middle man for the electricity for the newly deregulated states. This allowed Enron to sell energy at higher prices, increasing its revenue.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Enron Case Introduction After watching the video “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room”, (Youtube), several issues came into light. It is known that Enron has been the seventh largest company to declare the bankruptcy in the year 2001. The reasons of their bankruptcy were becoming clear as many investors lost millions of dollars, due to which the lawmakers sought to enact some legislation so that these activities could be prevented. Obviously the smartest people from Enron had entered various questionable transaction with the customers and different entities.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays