The case involves ethics and fraud, “Ethics What a Fraud!” (Gomez-Mejia, Balkin, & Cardy, 2012). The case explains that the tight economy calls or conveys high competition for jobs. The case starts by mentioning such facts to be clear on the point that these factors will push an individual’s integrity and morals. By doing this, the case is clear on where it stands on fraud. The case moves on to explain that these harsh conditions, pressure applicants to misrepresent their back ground, with hopes that such acts will help them land a beneficial career. The hope, of course, is that this bit of fudging will help them get the job (Gomez-Mejia, Balkin, & Cardy, 2012). After making its point clear about how lying on ones resumes or application is morally incorrect, the case finishes by informing the reader that such fraud will approximately occur in thirty percent of job applicants. By finishing off with such information, the case is pointing out that these actions must be considered …show more content…
Credentials are very important for any level of profession. This view is accurate because most consumers, of any level, pay for a service, and this service pays according to the professional knowledge. This means or carries greatly for all professions. Also, this idea is valid because ethics bring up the subject of doing right or wrong, and for a consumer, one must choose the professional who remains ethically correct. Ethics are central because they give an individual a baseline for understanding the concepts of right and wrong (All About Philoshopy.org Staff, 2015). When a professional decides to lie on credentials, they will lie to the