Case Study: Drug Courts

Improved Essays
Drug courts constitute a clear example of an integrated public health and safety strategy that has shown promise for reducing drug use and recidivism rates. Drug courts are separate criminal courts providing supervised treatment for drug offenders as an alternative to incarceration. Drug courts provide offenders with intensive court supervision, mandatory drug testing, and substance abuse treatment. Successful completion of the program allows the offender to avoid incarceration, have their criminal charges reduced or dismissed, or have their sentences reduced. Those found not in compliance with the program rules typically receive a criminal drug conviction and may be sentenced to incarceration. The evidence is clear that drug courts can increase an offender’s contact to treatment. Numerous drug court evaluation have found, on average, more than half of offenders participating in the program completed at least one year; most of which continue on to graduate from it. This compare favorably to community based drug treatment programs in which, on average, more than three quarters of attendees drop out within the first year. …show more content…
Two experimental studies have compared outcomes between participants randomly assigned to either drug court or a comparable probationary condition. In one study, the Maricopa County (Arizona) Drug Court was found to have had no impact on re arrest rates 12 months after admission to drug court. However, a significant “delayed effect” was detected at 36 months, at which time 33 percent of the drug court participants had been rearrested, compared to 47 percent of subjects in various probationary

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    California Proposition 36

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In November of 2000, over 60 percent of California voters approved the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act, a statute designed to aid non-violent drug offenders (“California Proposition 36”). Under Proposition 36, individuals convicted of non-violent drug offenses are offered probation and community-based treatment programs, in lieu of incarceration (“California Proposition 36”). The concept behind the proposition is commendable, but also very controversial. In terms of eligibility and qualification requirements for Proposition 36, the authors of the statue were quite clear.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    are unsupported by the evidence” (137). While no statistics exist to prove that drug courts impact the amount of initial arrests, statistics do prove drug courts decrease the number of rearrests. In Jessica Huseman’s article “Drug Courts Are a Good Alternative for Drug Offenders” she reviews several scenarios in which individual or specific areas of drug courts have lowered to percentage of rearrests. In New York City, six drug courts decreased the number drug rearrests by twenty-nine percent for three years after the initial arrest. In Oregon, a single drug court reduced the amount of drug rearrests for thirteen years after the initial arrest by twenty-four perent.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Court Research Paper

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drug courts are utilized by the criminal justice general sessions courts to try to end the abuse of drugs such as alcohol and substance. In drug court, it will allow the choice of the individual who may need that extra help to fight their addiction by offering to partake in a treatment program. If the individual successfully completes the program they are subject to getting their case dismissed. “In exchange for successful completion of the treatment program, the court may dismiss the original charge, reduce or set aside a sentence, offer some lesser penalty, or offer a combination of these” (NADCP, 1997). Drug courts generate surroundings that are clear and with certain principles.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Family Drug Courts

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Family Drug Courts were created to help families with parents that have substance abuse problems. Family Drug Courts help children that are abused and neglected due to the parental substance abuse. In almost all of the cases the children were taken out of the home and placed in foster care. “ An estimated 50% to 80% of child welfare cases are related to substance abuse and parental substance abuse has been identified as a contributing factor for up to two-thirds of children in out-of-home placements”.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, I spent my day observing juvenile detention hearings and a drug court trial in Mercer County, New Jersey. For my first observation, I went to Mercer Family Division in Mercer County, New Jersey. I observed several juvenile detention hearings. I asked one of my previous supervisors if I could sit in with her during her time in court. Overall the process for each child went relatively briefly.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Drug Courts

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Previous to drug courts, an offender would be sentenced and become incarcerated without the judge knowing what happened to the offender unless they came back through the court system. A judge and the team that provides services to rehabilitate and address underlining issues of the offender’s crime have oversight while maintaining the monitoring offender’s actions. The drug court provides solutions for offenders instead of punishments that don’t change or offer change to behaviors. According to the National Institute of Justice, the success of drug courts relies on the interaction of the judge, proper assessment of treatment and dedicated staff (Do Drug Courts Work? Findings From Drug Court Research, n.d.).…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Drug Court Arguments

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Drug courts are helpful and useful, but they can tend to hurt people or society. First and foremost…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance Abuse Treatment in the Juvenile Justice System Juvenile offenders have a high rate of substance use. Upon arrival to a correctional facility after being detained, approximately 56% of boys and 40% of girls tested positive for drugs. Most of these youth test positively for marijuana or cocaine, but many are addicted to many more substances. The DSM-V defines a substance-use disorder as “a maladaptive pattern of substance use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress…” classified by encompassing 2 or more of 11 different criteria from the manual. By effectively treating substance-use disorders, the juvenile justice system can: a) stop the offender from committing the criminal act of drug use itself and b) decrease recidivism rates of juvenile offenders by truly treating them instead of perpetuating them to become a product of the…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Court Case Analysis

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Drug courts are specialist courts that attempt to divert illicit drug users from incarceration and instead work to address underlying drug dependency via intensive treatment programs, with the hope that long-term rehabilitation is achieved (AIC 2015). To be eligible to attend a drug court, a person must not; be charged with an offence involving violent conduct, be under 18, or outside of the specified local area (The Drug Court of NSW 2015) In 2012, there were varied opinions between the NSW government and a Senior Chief Magistrate over the closure of a NSW youth drug court that was deemed ‘too costly’ to run (ABC 2012). The Senior Chief Magistrate believed the drug court was a far less costly approach in the long-term, and accused the government…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Court Essay

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Are drug courts the most effective way of treating drug-addicted people? A drug court is a treatment based alternative to youth detention facilities, prisons, jails, and probation. These courts make use of drug testing, immediate sanctions, and treatment services. The criminal justice system works with treatment systems to provide an offender with proper tools to recover and maintain a crime-free life. Drug courts reduce crime and drug use, save money, restore lives, and reunite families.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By keeping these rehabilitated individuals out of the prisons, have created more space for the more serious offenders. The Probation program main focus is on Recidivism. It is a continual effort to provide strategies and treatment to achieve this goal. Studies have been conducted on Probation, and it is proven that recidivism rates vary depending on the place, seriousness of the crime, population, length of probation, and amount and quality of intervention, surveillance and enforcement (Schmalleger, Ortiz Smykla 2015, p.105). Pros and Cons of both Programs…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    long course of intensive treatment, return to criminal lifestyles after leaving treatment. Studies indicate that up to 48% of the graduates from diversion programs could end up having contact with the law within one to three years following the completion of treatment . Recidivism is not an accidental event, that occurs by chance. Past research has repeatedly identified a small collection of factors associated with re-offending in the general offender population. Young age and extensive criminal history have emerged as the best predictors of future recidivism, while marital status and employment have also been found to be important, although less consistently.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People with drug and mental problems should not go through the same vigorous process of those who stole or murdered. Drug courts differ in clientele and procedure than the “typical courts.” First of all, drug courts deal with defendants with substance abuse. The courts get the nonviolent offenders, and they are offered treatment in the community. The judge overseeing the drug court requires mandatory drug testing and monitoring.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Ferranti, S., n.d.) Becoming drug free is tough when there isn’t a compassionate network of people to support them; therefore it is important for prisoners to be introduced to these programs while incarcerated. An experiment was conducted in Sweden that was published in the Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology & Crime Prevention, a peer-reviewed journal of scientific work, where 741 prisoners were compared to prisoners with the same statistical likelihood of reoffending. The results showed that the prisoners who received drug treatment prior to their release show a significantly lower amount of re-offense than the group who did not. (Holmberg, S., & Öberg, J., 2012)…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An implementation of any strategic criminal justice practice must be tailored to target a definite and specific desired outcome. The concept of social control is important and must be at the forefront of any and all criminal justice practices. Repeat violators of criminal law are a major problem within the current system, and reducing recidivism is an absolute necessity. Targeting a specific criminal justice issue and placing full attention to a certain dynamic is the overall goal of reducing recidivism for minority, illegal drug violators. The criminal justice practice this paper intends to strategize and implement is targeting the applicable social groups; those being minority illegal drug offenders and the professionals they interact with while being processed throughout the criminal justice system in order to prevent…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays