Advantages And Disadvantages Of Drug Courts

Decent Essays
Written Assignment 3- Courts
With the changes of how people look at different situations, the law had to also change. More specialized courts were created intended for more therapeutic purposes. A lot of the specialized courts focus on both drug and mental problems. Some people who use drugs are not bad people, but they are just in the wrong place. Some people with mental issues do not realize what they are doing or the effects of their actions. People with drug and mental problems should not go through the same vigorous process of those who stole or murdered.

Drug courts differ in clientele and procedure than the “typical courts.” First of all, drug courts deal with defendants with substance abuse. The courts get the nonviolent offenders, and they are offered treatment in the community. The judge overseeing the drug court requires mandatory drug testing and monitoring. They defendants are like on probation but
…show more content…
The main disadvantage is that some people will try and abuse the system. The drug court is supposed to be for those who need help, usually will try to get help. The people who will abuse the court are the criminals who blame their actions on the drugs. For example, Joe has been stealing for years, and he has just recently been doing drugs. Joe has started trying to steal more and more to buy the drugs he wants. He finally gets caught in the process. Should he have to go to a normal court or should he go to a drug court? If he went to a drug court, then he is getting a less harsh punishment, even though his intent was to steal in the first place before taking drugs. Another issue is the funding for the courts. Some states are reconsidering their ability to fund these courts. Without funding, there is no specialized drug court. People do not realize how much they will actually miss something until it is gone. On the other hand, mental health courts have enough funding for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, we see minimum harsh punishments given to drug criminals because the court system, in order to save money and other resources, doesn’t want to hear the drug court cases. When drug cases appear in court, it is up to the judge to decide the sentencing for the criminal. Many judges are awarding these criminals with a minimum harsh sentencing right away, making everything easier for the courts by not even having the case go to court. According to the book, The New Jim Crow, written by Michelle Alexander, “‘The value of a mandatory minimum sentence lies not in its imposition, but in its value as a bargaining chip to be given away in return for the resource-saving plea from the defendant to a more leniently sanctioned charge’”…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper examines the effectiveness of drug treatment courts. In the past, there are many ways in which drug treatment courts are scrutinized. For purposes of this paper, the effectiveness of drug treatment courts will be evaluated through rates of recidivism. This paper describes the drug court model and how it differs from traditional courts. It will take a look at the history of drug treatment courts detailing how they became a part of the United States of America’s criminal justice system today.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Drug Court Model

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This paper written by Amanda B. Cissner and Michael Rempel, discusses what the drug courts are, a brief explanation when and how the drug courts got started, how do they work, and what do they do for the people who are given the treatment for their dug usage problems. In this review paper I’m going to explain what those points are and what do they mean to me in my own words. Drug courts was introduced in 1989 in Miami, it launched dramatic shift in how the court system responds to the criminal behavior of drug addicted defendants, by combining treatment with close supervision, the drug court model offered new alternative to the unproductive and costly cycle of addiction crime, and incarceration. In other ways it seems like they’re going to…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study: Drug Courts

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drug courts constitute a clear example of an integrated public health and safety strategy that has shown promise for reducing drug use and recidivism rates. Drug courts are separate criminal courts providing supervised treatment for drug offenders as an alternative to incarceration. Drug courts provide offenders with intensive court supervision, mandatory drug testing, and substance abuse treatment. Successful completion of the program allows the offender to avoid incarceration, have their criminal charges reduced or dismissed, or have their sentences reduced. Those found not in compliance with the program rules typically receive a criminal drug conviction and may be sentenced to incarceration.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Courts Case Study

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Introduction In the United States (U.S.), drug courts were first established in the late 1980s. The limited range and effectiveness of the criminal justice measures then for dealing crimes involving drugs fueled the development of drug courts. Since then, drug courts have evolved. Studies have indicated positive findings regarding drug courts.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Over half of the prisoners in the federal system are incarcerated for nonviolent drug offenses because of mandatory minimum sentencing. (NeSmith, 2015). Not only do they have damaging repercussions mentally but they also negatively affect the families of those punished by minimum sentencing. Because judges were unsure and untrained on how to use their discretion there was little to no appellate review on sentencing.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I had to leave before the trial concluded, however, it did not look good for the defendant. I found the over experience to be beneficial. The atmosphere of Drug court versus Family Court was visibly distinctive. The cases that are heard in the Drug courtroom dealt with large amounts of drugs, therefore, the penalty is greater. The drug court judge was stern and intolerable.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance Abuse Treatment in the Juvenile Justice System Juvenile offenders have a high rate of substance use. Upon arrival to a correctional facility after being detained, approximately 56% of boys and 40% of girls tested positive for drugs. Most of these youth test positively for marijuana or cocaine, but many are addicted to many more substances. The DSM-V defines a substance-use disorder as “a maladaptive pattern of substance use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress…” classified by encompassing 2 or more of 11 different criteria from the manual. By effectively treating substance-use disorders, the juvenile justice system can: a) stop the offender from committing the criminal act of drug use itself and b) decrease recidivism rates of juvenile offenders by truly treating them instead of perpetuating them to become a product of the…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Providing drug treatment for offenders with substance abuse could also help reduce the overcrowding in prisons and offer a more rehabilitative environment for prisoners that need it. Rehabilitation is very important for preventing prisoner from…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Courts Recidivism

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due to the implications of Reagan's War on Drugs laws, drug courts have demonstrated and proven to reduce recidivism for offenders who abuse substances. To deter overcrowding in the prisons, Researcher Messer has found that drug courts can be instrumental in deterring offenders from reoffending. It is surprising that “85% of offenders incarcerated require substance abuse treatment” (Messer, 2016). Drug courts allow offenders to “attain important skills/ideas, improve relationships with family and children, a general educational development certificate, a driver’s license, and/or gainful employment” (Messer, 2016). Researcher Shaffer studied over “80 drug courts and found recidivism rates of 46% for those who participated in drug court programming”…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Court Essay

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to NADCP (2015), “Drug courts keeping drug addicted offenders out of jail and in treatment has proven to reduce drug abuse and crime while saving money.” They significantly reduce drug use and crime and are more cost effective than other criminal justice…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Drug Court Recidivism

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Drug courts exist on the basis of preventing future crime. Imagine if you were leaving work today and were approached by a drug-addicted offender who had just been released from jail without receiving treatment. Chances are, the offender would be drug seeking and attempting to fund a drug purchase and might attack you to steal your wallet and cell phone. As the victim, you might seek medical treatment, suffer financial harm, loss of communication, possibly time off from work, and even more time filing a police report and attending court hearings. If the offender was participating in a drug court, they may have the proper support to fight their addiction and cause you no harm, leaving you to go home…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Programs like these should be used to help the struggling ones and get them the help they need. 3. Using the justice system does not solve the problems of drug users. Going to prison often times does not help drug users stop using drugs. This is proven with the statistic that two-thirds of prisoners reoffend within three years of leaving prison accordin to The New Times.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One includes the already little available mental health services. This puts a limit to the amount of referrals that a court can make. This in turn ultimately limits the amount of people that can be helped. Another criticism involves the longer sentencing that tends to come in mental health programs. Concerns arise that the time that is served does not always fit the crime.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Causes Of Prison Overcrowding

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    The judicial system was buckling down on different drug offenses such as crack-cocaine, marijuana and opium. In 1985 marijuana was marked as the nation’s “number one problem” when it came to drug abuse. More people started using excessive amounts of marijuana since there was a decriminalization law. Eventually, it reached a high of sixty-four percent; programs and treatments were brought upon such as D.A.R.E (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) and G.R.E.A.T (Gang Resistance Education and Training). These programs were not just for adults, these were mainly targeted towards the youth so they will be pushed in the right direction.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays