Cs Lewis Moral Law Analysis

Great Essays
Part 2) Introduction: In C.S. Lewis’ essay, he contemplates the Moral Law and what it entails because it is something that most humans abide to. One of his examples describes the mental process when one hears a person yelling for help. A human experiences two instincts in that moment, a fight or flight situation; one being that they should do everything they can to help the person and the other is fleeing to protect their own safety. It is a battle between being good for others or for yourself. A person’s reaction depends on which of those instincts are stronger, and that is why not all humans obey the Moral Law. In some people, the instinct for their own survival is stronger than the instinct to do good by others. However, this is the opposite of what the Moral Law calls humans to do: serve others more than ourselves. Lewis comes to the conclusion that there is a Moral Law that most humans follow. They follow it out of the goodness of their own heart, or they do not follow it because their selfish motivations outweigh the drive to do good by others.
1.
…show more content…
The example that I found the most persuasive is when he considers a crisis, and you have the options of fight or flight. It was a relatable example that puts his view into perspective and gives him the support he needs to back up his argument. Another example that I found to be persuasive is when he considers the morality of different societies throughout history. Although eastern civilizations differ from western civilizations in their practices; the core is still the same, and there seems to be a similar law throughout them all, the Moral Law. I also found the examples that Lewis used in his writing to be helpful in understanding what he means. For every argument that he proposed there was an example to show the reader why the argument is true. He made his writing clear and concise which helped with understanding because there was not unnecessary

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Everyday, people carry on with their lives knowing that there is both good and evil in the world. Some might distinguish the evil outweighing the good, while others spot the good outweighing the evil. Whichever side one might choose from this debate, it is natural that for humans to stop and wonder about humanity. A recurring controversy that crosses over a person's mind is whether humans are naturally and inherently good or, worse, they’re naturally and inherently evil. Society tends to lean on the idea that humans are selfish, in fact, 78% of the population believes others to be more selfish than they really are.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I appreciate your points on provision 2 and 3 of the Code of Ethics set forth by the American Nurses Association. Provision 3 states that the nurse acts as an advocate for the patient, protecting their rights health and safety (ANA, 2015). From the onset of nursing school we learn that nurses are the patients advocate. It seems almost cliché after many years in the clinical setting and at times I think nurses advocate for patients in ways they are not even aware. Currently I work in the ambulatory care setting of a busy neurosurgical practice.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. A. K. Moravec – Rebuttal I have to say that was, well, interesting. This has to be a short rebuttal and so I will just pick up on one area of disagreement. There are major flaws in the argument that trans-humanism lacks an able morality; in fact I want to argue that we have a moral obligation to pursue trans-humanism. We have obligations as people, and John Harris points out 2 main obligations.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tom Regan argues for the treatment of animals to be the same as that of humans. Rather than arguing a utilitarian perspective, Regan posits that an inherent value exists within entities that are what he calls “the subject of a life,” or rather have the ability to perceive and to possess desires and to deprive these entities of their life without sufficient moral reasoning is unconscionable. While humans may be privy to a larger range of cognitive abilities, Regan argues that these talents are superfluous and that mutual respect must be equally enjoyed amongst all subjects of life. This implies that consumption of meat must cease and that subjection to research cannot unilaterally be applied to animals. Opponents to Regan’s stance argue that…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Peter Singer’s argument, the reader is forced to analyze the morality of their day-to-day lives. Singer’s ethical argument challenges ordinary consumers to change their unnoticeable immoral routines of disregarding charitable donations. He argues there is no moral difference between a man letting a child drown so his shoes are not ruined and someone buying luxury items instead of donating that money to a relief agency. In this paper, I will clarify any relevant terminology, elucidate Singers argument, discuss the claims on a moral difference, and ultimately defend the claim that proximity is not morally relevant. Clarifying any terminology: moral duty or obligation means a duty which one owes, and which he ought to preform, but which he…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction This review is intended to explain and analyze how business ethics class helps the student to understand and realize their values. Ultimately, practicing these values. In the article “Can We Teach Character? An Aristotelian Answer,” the author Edwin M. Hartman applies Aristotle’s view of ethics and his thought of virtues to support his claim that good character is teachable, and business ethics class would have cultivated good moral values to students. I believe that typical ethic course could teach one’s basic regard to right or wrong and morality, but one is free to made its own decision on what is right to do.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    C.S. Lewis, author of “Mere Christianity,” stands alone from many other authors of Christian literature. Instead of opinionated doctrine convoluted to nonsense, Lewis offers a logical approach to the Christian view of life. Yet, he does this without hardly mentioning Christianity itself in the whole first book. By then, however, he has already convinced me that he is right and that there can be no other God but the God of the Christian faith. Lewis does this by breaking down the moral law.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Blaise Pascal's Argument

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Blaise Pascal’s basic belief was that all people have to just take a 50/50 wager for the existence of God. His claim comes from his belief that there is no reasonable way to support either side of the argument about the existence of God. Although Blaise Pascal was a brilliant French philosopher, mathematician and physicist, his claim that there is no creditable evidence to support a reasonable belief about God is not completely correct. It is just an easy way to completely avoid an intelligent quest of the existence of God. We can see clear proof for both the true existence of God and thus proof that Blaise Pascal was incorrect.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in contrast to the question previously answered, when dealing with the second question, does injustice contradict with human nature, one must critically think of, and understand, what is meant by human nature. Human nature in this sense is not like that of the natural instinct of a wild creature, but rather it is the natural law all humans universally abide by. Cicero describes it best as, “knowledge of the truth, comes closest to the essentials of human nature, for we are all impelled and attracted towards a desire for discovery and knowledge.” It is the private interest of an individual which a person seeks and ultimately, voluntarily, agrees to follow. With that in mind, this question is referring to the unwritten law among human…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The way he elaborated his personal experiences was quite persuasive and realistic such that anyone could distinctly understand what he was describing much like they had themselves experienced that situation. The depth of detail he uses…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He goes on to prove this throughout his essay as he establishes credibility for himself, a logical standpoint and an emotionally ground crucial point of the essay. He does so effectively as his entire essay is able to connect to the audience rather early in the essay and is able to drive home his point as it continues. His use of ethos, pathos and logos allowed for him to draw the reader in and quickly control the pace of the argument to convince everyone that he was…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Curtis “Stickman” Brummitt Looking at the history of humanity, one can see that we are a people whom claim to have strong ties to morality, with the ability to actively determine right and wrong, yet every day we stray further and further from the rightness we so often claim to possess. Poets and writers, already known for criticizing humanity for its every flaw, have unsurprisingly leapt at the opportunity to again berate humans for their disregard for doing the right thing. “We must cultivate our garden.” The final crew in Voltaire’s Candide meet up with a wise, normal Muslim man near the end of the book.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to make his argument resonate with the readers, his choice of persuasive writing tactics such as comparison, amplifications, personifications, and allusions, does the trick. Without these persuasive tactics, the connection he has made between the readers and his writing would be lost. The connections…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of logic establishes rationality in his words. For example, he states that the younger citizens of the United Kingdom are less literate than the older generation. He then goes on to explain that the world will be left and succeeded by unintelligent people that will ruin what the older generations had worked so hard to establish, instead of working to improve it. With these explanations, he makes his points clearer to the audience through this cause and effect scenario and it becomes more persuasive for the audience to support literacy. Basically, by adding more detail, he simplifies his reasons to the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics