Bentham's Theory Of Utilitarian Ethics

Improved Essays
Bentham believed, an action that is compliant to the belief of utilitarianism is right or at least not wrong. It must be done, or at least it is not the case that it might not be done. Bentham doesn’t use the word 'responsibility ' here. Rights and responsibilities are ethical ideas, connected with the concepts of knowledge and authorization. What we think of moral duties and rights would need an ethical representative but religious ideas are outside the range of his philosophy. To speak of accepted rights and responsibilities suggests a commandment without a lawmaker, and is irrational in the same way as a son without a parent. Aside from hypothetical reflections, Bentham also doomed the belief in natural rights on the fact that it inspired …show more content…
When it comes to making ethical decisions, it really takes a lot of power to actually make an ethical decision. The willpower that is needed to make an ethical decision is also a difficult thing to do at times. Bentham believes that utilitarianism is the quality of right and wrong and the contentment that comes along with it. For one to be content with a decision, it must be an ethical one. Contentment only is achieved when an ethical decision is made. An unethical decision usually brings pain in oneself or it can bring pleasure depending on the individual. Bentham’s theory on utilitarianism should help us think before we act. If one were to act without thinking then consequences are going to be harshly granted. It takes an intelligent mind to make ethical decisions, because it shows that the individual has taken the time to actually think about the decision before they acted upon it. Bentham has a great concept on making ethical decisions, the belief that consequences are given whether the decision was ethical or unethical. It’s either a reward or punishment that is given through a decision. Through Kant’s mind, we make decisions to receive pleasure or pain. Pleasure is given to those who have created an ethical decision and sometimes ethical decisions can be painful as well. It can be in a form of sacrifice that will give someone else pleasure, but not yourself. Morality is a theory of doing something “right” and respected to the law. When making ethical decisions, we should be thinking of making decisions that work with the law and not against it. That can be pleasure in itself. Anytime a decision goes against the law, it’ll cause issues that are not worth experiencing. The idea of life is to always make ethical decisions and think before we

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In other words, utilitarianism deals with sentientism, being able to perceive or feel things. Bentham goes on to defend the rights of animals by stating that the interests of every being affected by any action are to be taken into account and given the same weight as the like interests of any other being. For example, Bentham uses the analogy of an inanimate object, such as kicking a stone. A young child kicks a stone. Does that stone feel pain?…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pleasure doesn’t bring happiness to everyone or actions of people do not just happen to make them happen. Everyone have a different life and meaning to their life. Some are chasing their dreams and trying to earn everything to get in life. Even though we avoid pain as humans sometimes pain is what we need in order to be stronger than before and to learn from our past and mistakes. All situations shouldn’t be considered equally because some people deserve to be heard and the reasons behind their actions.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    First of all, this case presented, can be analyzed using Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarian…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When considering an act, we must envision all the pleasures and pains that it will cause. Subsequently, we must add all pleasures on one side and all pains on the other (Collier & Haliburden, 2015, p.7). If the situation leads to more pleasures than pains, then the act is morally permissible. What qualifies this test is that Bentham beliefs were radically egalitarian (Collier & Haliburdon, 2015, p.7). Essentially, this means that no pleasures are more pleasurable than other pleasures and, similarly, no pains are more painful than other pains.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bentham believes in the principle of utility, understanding the difference between right and wrong, causes and its effects and pleasures and pain. Kant believes in the Universal Law, and knowing what is right is based solely on the intentions of the universal law. I would like to begin with a brief…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham’s publications and works such as Anarchical Fallacies contain what has been claimed to be one of the most influential critiques of natural rights, and thus human rights, ever published (Schofield, 2003, p. 2). This critique of natural rights is a theme which is present throughout Bentham’s writing, from beginning to end. Bentham’s reference to natural rights as “nonsense on stilts” is directly referring to his rejection of the notion of natural rights, and whilst some argue for the existence of natural rights, it seems that rights are generally agreed to be a social construct. For Bentham and other political thinkers natural rights do not exist because they are unfounded, and are equally unenforceable. Similarly, whilst Bentham…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bentham's Principle of Utility: (1) recognizes the fundamental role of pain and pleasure in human life, (2) approves or disapproves…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jai’lece McCracken Medical Law & Ethics Term Paper Should Sally be Sterilized Sally Smith is 26 years old and is disabled. Her aunt has gone to court to have the young woman sterilized. Smith opposes the sterilization, but a judge has decided that since Sally “would suffer irreparable psychological damage” if she had a child, she should be sterilized. Should Sally be allowed to have children?…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism was founded by Jeremy Bentham. Bentham’s utilitarianism was defined…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham (1749-1832) was an English political philosopher and legal reformer who founded the theory of utilitarianism in An Introduction of Principles and Moral Legislation in 1789. Utilitarianism is a teleological theory derived from the Greek term telos, meaning ‘end’ or ‘goal’ because it holds that the final consequence of an action determines its moral validity, regardless of whether the nature of that intention. Bentham began with his definition of human nature, proclaiming that “human beings are under governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure”. We invariably seek pleasure and avoid pain wherein these antagonistic forces ultimately determine everything we do and what we ought to do. Bentham contended that happiness…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of an action. Endowing to the classical utilitarian moral theory, we classify human acts or practices as we consider neither the nature of the acts or practices nor the motive for which people do what they do. This can harvest to one’s action; that a life conceivably is saved, which matters morally. There is no total distinction between what is right and what is wrong based on Bentham’s view, only if the consequences are the highest favorable for the person’s greatest happiness, even including the majority of the people related to this person who is responsible to give that action. Drawing a conclusion about utilitarianism, it is our duty to decide which action or practice is best by considering the likely or actual consequences of each substitute.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout our lives, we are given various choices throughout the day that have some sort of impact on us, large or small. The amazing thing about these choices is that we can decide which choice to make. Most often, people decide on how to make these choices based on their wants and desires at the time. People, religion, and cultures allow this type of decision making to occur but often hail good ethical thinking as the best way to use in decision making. Philosophers throughout history have intrigued upon newer and diverse ways in ethical thinking and swear that theirs is the way people should look at the world.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pain and punishment are two words that interweave with each other in accordance with criminal justice. However, the way an individual is able to interpret these words can develop very different, and influential forms of thinking. Nevertheless, these developed forms of thinking allow individuals to form opinions on the subject, and aid in the formation our state. In this essay I am going to be explaining both Immanuel Kant, and Jeremy Bentham’s individual stances on punishment. This will include the theories of retributivism, and deterrence as leading factors to explain each theory.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    It usually maximizes the total benefits and reduces the negatives for the greatest number of people. Two major contributors of Utilitarianism were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Jeremy Bentham believed that mankind was under two masters: pain and pleasure. As well, through the hedonistic perspective, Bentham said the greater good we should look for is happiness. The actions that increase happiness and diminish pain create utility.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is an “act as to maximize or further pleasure for everyone.” Jeremy Bentham, a philosopher and creator of the Hedonic Calculus argues that there are only two masters when it comes to maximizing happiness, pleasure v.s. pain. However, according to his calculus whoever is receiving more pleasure than pain, by all means should continue the act, even if it is immoral. For example, if a sadist is torturing an innocent person and is receiving more pleasure than the innocent person is receiving pain then, according to Bentham it is okay for the sadist to continue because that would mean maximum happiness has been achieved. And the sole goal of Utilitarianism is to maximize pleasure for everyone.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics