Bentham's Theory Of Utilitarian Ethics

Improved Essays
Bentham believed, an action that is compliant to the belief of utilitarianism is right or at least not wrong. It must be done, or at least it is not the case that it might not be done. Bentham doesn’t use the word 'responsibility ' here. Rights and responsibilities are ethical ideas, connected with the concepts of knowledge and authorization. What we think of moral duties and rights would need an ethical representative but religious ideas are outside the range of his philosophy. To speak of accepted rights and responsibilities suggests a commandment without a lawmaker, and is irrational in the same way as a son without a parent. Aside from hypothetical reflections, Bentham also doomed the belief in natural rights on the fact that it inspired …show more content…
When it comes to making ethical decisions, it really takes a lot of power to actually make an ethical decision. The willpower that is needed to make an ethical decision is also a difficult thing to do at times. Bentham believes that utilitarianism is the quality of right and wrong and the contentment that comes along with it. For one to be content with a decision, it must be an ethical one. Contentment only is achieved when an ethical decision is made. An unethical decision usually brings pain in oneself or it can bring pleasure depending on the individual. Bentham’s theory on utilitarianism should help us think before we act. If one were to act without thinking then consequences are going to be harshly granted. It takes an intelligent mind to make ethical decisions, because it shows that the individual has taken the time to actually think about the decision before they acted upon it. Bentham has a great concept on making ethical decisions, the belief that consequences are given whether the decision was ethical or unethical. It’s either a reward or punishment that is given through a decision. Through Kant’s mind, we make decisions to receive pleasure or pain. Pleasure is given to those who have created an ethical decision and sometimes ethical decisions can be painful as well. It can be in a form of sacrifice that will give someone else pleasure, but not yourself. Morality is a theory of doing something “right” and respected to the law. When making ethical decisions, we should be thinking of making decisions that work with the law and not against it. That can be pleasure in itself. Anytime a decision goes against the law, it’ll cause issues that are not worth experiencing. The idea of life is to always make ethical decisions and think before we

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When defining morality it is important to “recognize the existence of significant variation in what rules and ideals different people put forward as morality.” However, in philosophy, the ethical system which makes the best case for what morality is really about it would be Deontology rather than Consequentialism. This is because deontologists are concerned with doing the right thing because it is what is ultimately morally good which is more ethical than defining what is right by whether or not an act results in a positive consequence. “Ethics, also called moral philosophy, [is] the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.” The categorical imperative and other deontological teachings fit neatly into the definition of ethics since the top priority is to always do what is right before being concerned with anything else. Deontology defines what morality is really about because taking the most ethical approach is what a deontologist values most, the same cannot be said for a consequentialist, which makes deontology superior to consequentialism from a moral and ethical…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They acknowledge that there rules of thumbs, but sometimes absolute obedience to the rules don’t apply all the time. In addition, there can be conflict at times. Moral understanding and moral wisdom are needed to deal with particular situations. According to virtue ethics, this can only be gained through training, experience, and practice. This account of moral knowledge differs from other accounts given because of the way it views morality and what it deems as morally right.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brennan, Warren – PHI220 DL01 – Short Paper 1 Utilitarianism, as presented by Shafer-Landau, is an interesting ethical theory in that it presents the idea that at times it is immoral to act in a manner that we’ve been taught is moral. I will argue that Act Utilitarianism is a sound ethical theory and that it’s precepts are utilized in modern society despite many public figures making pronouncements against this behavior. Act Utilitarianism is sound because it allows its supporters to resolve conflicts that other ethical theories struggle with. It also fits within the norms of recognized moral behavior on a day to day basis while being based upon the idea of treating every individual’s well-being equally. In his writings, Shafer-Landau, explains…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If an individual is not religious, it does not mean that they can not fulfill their duty in their lives. Utilitarianism is an example that does not involve religious belief to fulfill their duty in life. “Utilitarianism is the doctrine that the rightness of actions be judged by their consequences” (Smart 78). Utilitarians are groups of individuals who believe in the theory of helping others and making our world a better place, no matter what religion one is. Ethical egoist are another group of individuals who can fulfill their duty in life without religious beliefs.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    It’s only possible through a virtuous character. Like mentioned earlier, virtues of character pertain to ethical practices. Once our virtue becomes a form of nature to us, they form our actions and decisions. They are deeply rooted because they define the way we feel pleasure and pain. If we have been habituated to feel pleasure and pain the right way, then those attitudes become second nature to us.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, your morals and virtues are what lead you to make that decision and ultimately the consequences that came with the decision not only affected you but everyone around you. The next reason why I believe virtue ethics to be more consequentialist than non-consequentialist is because the characteristics between a person who has virtue ethics has ethical egoism. According to Vaughn (P. 70) “the morally right action is the one that produces the most favorable balance of good over for oneself. The decision that somebody makes when dealing with different circumstances leads them to make decisions that will make them feel and look good in front of people. Someone with the mentality of an ethical egotist will think first about the consequences about the decision that they are about to make.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics is often used interchangeably with morality so it is not too surprising to learn ethics addresses questions of morality in philosophy. There is, however, a defining difference between morality and ethics. An individual that recognizes the difference between right and wrong and still chooses to do right is moral. Ethics are moral values in action, and this means that morality is apparent in those who do the right thing despite it being hard or dangerous. Utilitarians are of the mindset that one should do that which will produce the most happiness.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The moral worth of an action is measured in the intention. If the intention was right the action is just, regardless to the consequences. Further, he argues there is no such thing as a moral act without a good principle who guided it. Though, while good will is necessary, Kant make another distinction between good will that comes from our senses, to an act from a sense of duty. While the former is lesser because it means that we did not fully freely choose to act upon it, the latter is the one we should aspire to.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology focuses doesn’t focus on the results of certain actions, instead it focuses on the reasons for doing certain things. It is looking at your rights and you responsibilities of situations. Those who are following the deontology lifestyle believe that the most ethical path is made by following rules and standards. Deontology is more about morals and treating those how you would like to be treated. Those who follow it look to act in good faith to help other and everything thing else.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Of course this is composed of two words: moral, which is the principle of right and wrong, and flexibility, which is to be easily modified to respond to altered circumstances or conditions. In other words, moral flexibility is defined as not adhering to a certain set of principles, instead of morally adapting to the situation at hand. First of all, people with flexible morals can use it as an escape technique. Including situations that they would be cornered into if they were to stick with their principles. An interesting part of this is that by bending your morals, you not only get away with it, but you do not feel guilty either.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics