Aristotle Essay

757 Words Mar 16th, 2013 4 Pages
Thesis Statement:
“ [N]o supremely happy man can ever become miserable…” (I.10, 1100b.30)
This above statement is from the chapter in which Aristotle discusses “Can a man be called ‘happy’ during his lifetime?”.
From the micro perspective, the whole chapter is about whether happiness should be defined as permanent or momentary. Starting with Solon’s words and opposed examples illustrated by Aristotle, Aristotle leads us to deeply develop the definition and understanding of happiness. In his opinion, “happiness has permanence and is not amenable to changes under any circumstances”. Another element, for instance, fortune has the power to influence one’s happiness and revolve many times in one’s lifetime; however, Aristotle shows fortune
…show more content…
Secondly is the key word “supremely”, which describes the superlative form of happiness. The supreme happiness assures the man of virtue or excellence. Last is the “misery”, which stands for negative outcomes that Aristotle characterizes such as mistakes, self-indulgence, stinginess, grouchiness, vanity, apathy and self-depreciation. None of these consequences results from the good. The first two positive signs, which symbolize the two positive key words “happiness” and “supremacy”, subtract the last negative sign, which symbolizes the “misery”, results in an affirmative and stronger conclusion that the supreme happiness with an absolutely final end and completeness in every respect will never be accompanied by misery.
I strongly agree with the statement. Though changes may occur during one’s lifetime, they would not affect the true happiness. For instance, the life experience of Confucius can be considered as a robust verification of the statement. Confucius was an aristocratic descendent from Shang Dynasty but, after his father’s early death, the fortunes of his family declined. In addition, his official career was less than satisfactory. Confucius was a preeminent figure due to his wisdom; nevertheless, the Duke of Chou Dynasty placed peculiar weight on him only for his knowledge instead of his talent of governing a country. Those unsatisfactory events that

Related Documents