Aristotle's Arguments Against Circular Proof Essay

Superior Essays
Aristotle further lengthens his study of syllogism in On Interpretation to study modal logic. Modal logic is phrases that use possibly or necessarily. On Interpretation does bring up a problem about a fixed future. The problem is that what happened in the past either happened or it didn’t, therefor what happens in the future will either happen or it will not. So that brings up the idea of a fixed future. Aristotle rejects this idea of a fixed future and says that what is said about the future cannot be either true or false, (Sparknotes, 2014).
In Aristotle’s work Posterior Analytics he covers a couple things including an argument against circular proof. “In Posterior Analytics 1.3, Aristotle advances three arguments against circular proof”,
…show more content…
“As a political scientist, Aristotle produced a catalog of governments in which he discussed a number of different types of governments such as monarchy, aristocracy, democracy, oligarchy, and even constitutional government”, (Husarik, 2014 pg. 202). For Aristotle’s Politics he studied the constitutions of one hundred- fifty eight different states and arrived at general categories for organized government. “He identified three good forms of government: monarchy, aristocracy, and constitutional government” (Duiker, Spielvogel, 2007, pg 112). Aristotle then goes on to say that a monarchy could turn into a tyranny, an aristocracy could turn into an oligarchy, and a constitutional government could turn into anarchy. Aristotle favored constitutional government over all other options. Aristotle believed that no matter kind of government that is being run the most power must be invested into the middle class. Aristotle states that if the most power is invested into the middle class that government will last the longest. The middle class has the power to keep the lower class under control while still keeping an eye on the upper class to make sure they behave properly, (Husarik, 2014, pg.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Best Government According to Waterman Lecture Notes, (1-3), Aristotle felt that the best government was the monarchy, a political system in which a state is ruled by a monarch, especially a king or queen, (governed by one)and by hereditary rights, followed by the aristocracy (governed by few) , people of the highest social or people of noble families or the highest social class, and that these type or class of people are the very best person or people, would most justly and effectively rule the society. Aristotle believed that almost all of the virtues relate to how we live with one another. We need other people to be generous or courageous towards (Waterman Lecture Notes1-3). According to Roochnik (220), Aristotle base his political science on a belief “that the city-state is the overarching organization of a variety of smaller organizations such as the family, the household, and the village in the city –state”, three levels; “Protection – From both natural forces and human and animal predators, Economic Cooperation – We benefit from skilled people learning various trades so everyone doesn’t have to do everything for oneself and, Ability to Live and…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alvan Ng First Tetralogy by Antiphon “Eikos” How do you prove that something is not your doing? How do you show that you were never there? Often we can only prove the concrete; we present evidence to prove a point or to prove otherwise, and we base our stand on evidence. Take for example the civil war in Israel between the Israel Defense Forces and the Hamas.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    But again, Aristotle cannot accept this, saying, “For we see that both deliberation and action originate things that will be.” Thus, he concludes the Principle of Bivalence cannot be applied to future contingents. However, this perhaps creates even more problems. By denying bivalence Aristotle is essentially denying the existence of any future whatsoever. To return to Aristotle’s original proposition, “there will be a sea battle tomorrow” without giving it a true or false truth value is to say that the statement is neutral.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Katherine Sierka Dodd PHL 150 20 September 2015 Aristotle’s “De Interpretatione” Aristotle's Sea Battle Problem, discusses whether every assertion about the future must be either true or false. The contradiction to Aristotle’s concept is an assertion in which states what the other denies. Aristotle’s The Sea Battle specifically stresses, “With regard to what is and what has been it is necessary for the affirmation or the negation to be true or false,” (e.g. Aristotle, p. 1) Aristotle’s two assertions were that, there will be a sea-battle tomorrow or that there will not be a sea-battle tomorrow. If there will be a sea battle tomorrow, and that is true, then it will still be true right now, and if it is true right now, it will be true no matter what.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Aristotle

    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A significance of the above is that legal justice is not absolute justice but is the kind of justice appropriate to the activity of doing law (Beever, Allan, 2004). Aristotle upholds that legal justice displays certain insufficiencies from the standpoint of absolute justice. One reason for this is that, “all law is universal, and there are some things about which it is not possible to pronounce rightly in general terms” (Beever, Allan, 2004, pg. 35). Aristotle’s view in ethics is the concluding claim that, “we must be satisfied with a broad outline of the truth; that is, in arguing about what is for the most part so from premises which are for the most part true we must be content to draw conclusions that are similarly qualified” (Beever, Allan, 2004, pg. 35). We can summarize this by saying, that for Aristotle, ethical truth is too complex to be taken by any limited stable set of principles.…

    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Democracy is governed by majority of the poor class's wants/needs. One form of democracy that was mentioned is the constructed based on equality where no one has an advantage on another person. Aristotle emphasizes the importance of a government that will help prevent injustice and that is practical to society. He also sheds light on the fact that everyone is different and the government needs to fulfill the different needs. For example, someone with a disability needs more assistance than a person without a disability.…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle and Plato’s World View on Democracy In this essay I will explore the views of democracy and the education of the people and reasons why Aristotle had a favorable view on it more than Plato did. In relation, Aristotle and Plato were great thinkers far beyond their time in philosophy. However, they had two very different world views on democracy and oligarchy.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    A seasoned account to do with the Greek philosopher Aristotle. To…

    • 3268 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two authors from classical Greece and ancient Rome believe that a fundamental part of human nature is to desire and seek power, whether be it from money, strength or knowledge. They agree that having too much power changes people’s decisions and clouds their judgment. The Greek historian of the Peloponnesian War, Thucydides, describes a connection between power and justice in his book The Peloponnesian War. He gives evidence that having too much power and the desire for more overrules personal morals and principles of justice. The Roman satirist named Juvenal, on the other hand, believes that desiring too much power brings suffering, which eventually leads to human downfall.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ancient Greeks have influenced our own governments with their different governments, democracy, and views. There were many different governments back in the ancient times; the Greeks personally had four main governments. “The Greek philosopher Aristotle divided Greek governments in monarchies, oligarchies, tyrannies, and democracies, and most historians still use these same divisions.” (Government…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle And Livy

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ancient philosophers believe that order, meaning, and justice are what humans make in the polis by how humans experience the world. The Ancients were more invested in res publica, or the public atmosphere, because they believed that the polis or republic came first before all. Order, meaning, and justice are the components to a republic and the Ancient philosophers dissect how politics create the environment in which people experience the world. These Ancients believe that the polis should be a symbiotic relationship; one that positively benefits both the individual and the city. Ancient philosophers Tacitus, Sallust, Cicero, Aristotle, Livy, and Aurelius believe that the regime or polis makes collective meaning, order, justice possible by…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, Galileo made an intensive argument using multiple theological philosophers. In particular, it was the Augustine who really provided strength to Galileo as Augustine had status among many theologians of that era (Reeves, 1991). Two factors that deteriorated Galileo’s argument was that he had not demonstrated the Copernicism, although in the beginning he led the readers to believe “that the sun is located at the center of the revolutions of the heavenly orbs” (Halsall, 1997, p. 2). If he was able to provide demonstration then all he would have had to rely on to separate science was the Principle of Priority Demonstration to further his argument (Reeves, 1991).…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history government has been a staple of society whether people have realized it or not. From Samarians to ancient Egypt all the way to Greece. Even in todays world we still use the government structures that man made thousands of years ago. Ancient Greece has several governments. The issue was that ancient Greece was not one signal city or empire but instead a series of cities called City-States with their own independent governments.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both philosophers, Lock and Aristotle, have written a variety of novels that concretely describes who they believe should rule. In the novel “The Politics of Aristotle”, Aristotle highlights the impact and influence that regimes have on our society. He thoroughly describes a regime as, “The way a city is arranged both with respect to its other offices and, above all, with respect to the office that has control over all the rest” (Aristotle 87). He goes on to specifying three correct regimes Kingship, aristocracy, and polity each on details a good way to rule. Although each one creates fair opportunities for the greater good, Aristotle deeply defines how each one creates some sort of unjust amongst the community.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The City and the Soul The Republic written by Plato in Socratic dialogue is one of the earliest text concerning the subject of justice and forms of government. In the text, Socrates and other Athenians debate on the true meaning of justice. After establishing the premises, Socrates concludes his arguments by praising aristocracy as the best form of government because it is ruled by rational philosopher kings who are just, and critique other forms of government, especially democracy because the desire nature of the human soul rules the city. Today, both forms of government still exist, but democracy seems to be the ideal form of government in the western civilization. Socrates is wrong with his conclusion that aristocracy exceeds democracy because reason exceeds appetite in an aristocracy.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics