Arguments Against Human Cloning In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Superior Essays
Mary Shelley, in her Science Fiction novel Frankenstein introduces her ideas of technological advancement as a problem between the characters. These problems are considered to be monstrous; however, the modern world would not be where we are today without the advancement of our technology. New discoveries of technology originated in the emergence of the Nineteenth Century and influenced the writing of Frankenstein. Some of these inventions including the discovery of electricity and advancements in biology and chemistry, which allowed intellectuals to seek unforeseen knowledge, created outcomes that became monstrous. Today, the outcomes of the many different technological discoveries of human cloning have become monstrous. Human cloning is …show more content…
In an article called, “Arguments Against Human Cloning,” by an organization that is called All About Popular Issues, the author, who is unknown, shares their opinion on a take-down that occurs in the process of cloning of an individual. The author states, “Another scientific argument is that genetic diversity helps provide the ‘pool’ of variations available for a robust human population” (“Arguments Against Human Cloning”). This scientific take-down occurs in the unique traits that each and every individual is given at their birth. The variability is what makes each and every individual unique through their own traits. When the variability is taken away, this is considered a monstrous act. In Frankenstein, Shelley writes, “Seek happiness in tranquility, and avoid ambition, even if it be only the apparently innocent one of distinguishing yourself in science and discoveries.” (Shelley). According to Shelley, technology becomes monstrous when it does not allow one to distinguish the happiness in oneself through the technological or scientific advancement. Seeking the happiness is the opposite of the act of being monstrous. When one seeks the happiness, everyone is uplifted. If Victor Frankenstein had found the happiness in his creation and helped his creation to find his happiness through how he could fit in, then he would not have committed such a …show more content…
For a person to have key connections through others is a very important task to keep up with. Making every relationship as high quality as possible will ensure no monstrous activity. Relationships with people has quite a big impact on one’s life. David Swanton believes, “That a human clone might distort some people’s views of human relationships.” (Swanton). Swanton believes the views of human relationships such as a family has an enormous bond that will always be able to come together peacefully. Agreeing with Swanton, Shelley also believes that the relationships within a family are very important Shelley states, “Once commenced, it would quickly be achieved, and I might be restored to my family in peace and happiness.” (Shelley 184).
Shelley argues that the family bond is what keeps the peace and happiness. For a clone, the only relationship it has is the relationship between it and it’s creator; however, that still would not be a family. The creator would instead be a dictator and have complete control over the clone. The monstrous activity of human cloning destroys the relationships that are essential to having a safe and enjoyable

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Scott and Shelley both critique the arrogance of humanity where man’s desire to usurp God leads him to misuse technology, ultimately resulting in the transgression of social and moral boundaries. In Frankenstein, Shelley incorporates the attitudes present within the Enlightenment, such as Galvanism, to create a hubristic protagonist who misuses science in order to transcend mortal boundaries. Shelley viewed the Enlightenment as a vain pursuit of scientific knowledge that stems from human pride and hence, fashioned Victor Frankenstein to be “The Modern Prometheus” who undertakes in a pursuit of knowledge without a clear moral framework. Furthermore, Shelley’s allusions to Milton’s “Paradise Lost” associates Frankenstein as the “fallen angel” who explicitly conveys his desire to foster technology for his own gain, evident in “what glory would attend the discovery if I could...render man invulnerable to any 

but a violent death”. The ideas of genetic engineering, which would have transcended moral boundaries at the time, are portrayed through the…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a world where everything must be donned “good” or “bad’, one has to ask the obvious question, is the science and experimentation in the novel Frankenstein good or bad? Victor Frankenstein sets a precedent of what not to do when you want to perform a science experiment. For this creature to be constructed out of absolutely nothing, Frankenstein must had to “desire it with an ardor that far exceeded moderation” which is unnecessary (p. 45). When someone wants something that bad, it needs to be planned out and organized, not thrown together with no regard to the safety of others. He wanted it more out of selfishness and didn’t realistically think about it and consider the consequences, thus resulting in a catastrophe.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All technology eventually reaches this point if abused even though it is not initially intended to be monstrous. Once technology is abused, itseffects can turn evil. The fact that Shelley’s warning proved to be applicable in the twenty­first century is astounding; it was almost as if Shelley could predict the future. Whether a technology is used for a cruel purpose or just simply misused, both topics demonstrate how an innocent creation will turn monstrous once…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the iconic 19th century novel, Frankenstein, Mary Shelley criticizes mankind's imbedded desire for that which is unreachable- supreme and ultimate knowledge- and the corruption that follows through mad scientist Victor Frankenstein's pursuit to create unnatural life to his eventual bastardization of the very root of human righteousness. Throughout the novel, Frankenstein's utter obsession for scientific development evolves into an unquenchable thirst for foremost knowledge. It can later be learned within the narrative that this ravenous hunger became a fountainhead for his ensuing corruption and eventual demise. Through highlighting mankind's desire to find the undiscoverable, Shelley symbolizes the contradiction and inevitable destruction of natural human righteousness. Through his determination to fabricate human life, Frankenstein finds he has morphed into a monster, inevitably bound for a life of exile and torment- the very thing he unknowingly was destined to create.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley appears to be against cloning due to the treatment the creature faces from society, the creatures negative behavior, and how Mary Shelley describes the creature. A clone is a cell, cell product, or organism that is genetically identical to the unit or individual from which it was derived (Dictionary). The term cloning describes a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity. The copied material, which has the same genetic makeup as the original, is referred to as a clone. There are three different types of artificial cloning: gene cloning, reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ambition In Frankenstein

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Frankenstein, a novel written by Mary Shelley tells the story of a scientist, Victor Frankenstein and his creation of a monstrous creature. Throughout the novel we are able to witness the relationship between the monster and his creator while simultaneously following their individual paths as they cross one another. From each individual journey we see how appearance, ambition, lack of compassion, affection, grief and horror contribute to each story and play a leading effect in the perspective of monster and man. Victor, an ambitious scientist who dreams of making human kind better, creates a figure, later known as the creature, with intentions of helping to “banish disease from the human frame” (Shelley 23). He wants to save…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shelley viewed the exponential growth of science as a danger to society. To her view science would isolate the humanity from the individual. This is represented in Frankenstein who isolates his humanity to achieve greatness. If an individual is not prepared to control himself with an overwhelming amount of knowledge they are in danger of losing their will, or even their sanity, which occurred to Frankenstein. Frankenstein states this in the book, “Increase of the old knowledge only discovered to me more clearly what a wretched outcast I was.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Scientific Advancement really beneficial? In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, the plot conveys that a an extremely heightened passion for the sciences has very detrimental effects, as the tone in the early part of Victor’s narrative suggests. As a result, in a sequence of events, scientific advancement can unintentionally lead one to turn into a monster. As a result of numerous scientific advancements, many people are harmed. Therefore, while part of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein illustrates the benefits of scientific advancement, the bulk of the plot mostly conveys the potential detriment and destructiveness that comes with progress.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On its face, Frankenstein is the creation story of a man-made human, turned monster. In reality, this tale is not about the creation of human, but rather the monstrous quality of devaluing a human. In short, Victor makes a human by hand, labels it a monster. He spends the rest of the story becoming a monster himself because he refuses to acknowledge the humanity of his creation. Here, to dehumanize a person is a monstrous act.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    How do you think you would feel if you are clone by someone’s will to donate your entire organ or for a different purpose? Or being made for a research purpose? How do you think you would be treated by the society? Life is going to be as hard as possible for a person that is cloned and living in this world because clones only have originals but no parents. It is like living in a world full of people but with no relatives or parent.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism This story addressees cloning. In a utilitarian’s viewpoint, it may be a good thing. It does aid in prolonging the life of the individuals cloned. It also can help in that, those who are cloned can go on with life not just for themselves but to continue in society contributing to the society as a whole.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If anyone could have the right to create a cloned child, what would stop a single person from having a clone? Someone who does not want a spouse or love but wants a ‘child’ of their own. This questions the nature of the relationship between a donor and a clone. Would the clone be considered a brother, sister or child? To bring a child into the world currently it involves the idea of family.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Upon creating the monster, Frankenstein’s intention was to create a profound new species that “…would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me (Shelley 30.)” However, when Frankenstein brings the monster to life with the use of electricity and different body parts sewn together, he is immediately horrified at the “ugliness” of his work. In Victor’s eyes, the creation is not the embodiment of these ‘excellent natures’ at all and he is certainly not fond of the idea of being the reason for its creation. The creation’s “yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was of a lustrous black, and flowing; his teeth of pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same colour as the dun-white sockets in which they were set, his shriveled complexion and straight black lips” (Shelley 44).…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone has always had an unusual fantasy of creating a being of their own and creating something that will have a huge impact on the world in a positive way. However, no one really thinks about the consequences that these fantasies and obsessions may have. In Mary Shelley's novel ¨Frankenstein¨ a young doctor, Victor Frankenstein, becomes completely obsessed with the idea of creating a life, a life that is so indestructible and that is better than mankind, but most importantly that is able to live forever. Victor becomes so obsessed with creating this creature that he is never able to see how hiedous his creation is turning out to be. As soon as the monster comes to life Victor realizes the disgrace that the creature is to what he was actually…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality In Frankenstein

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dr. Frankenstein’s obsession with proving his superior intelligence leads him to violate the laws of nature, and create the creature. When Dr. Frankenstein discovers the secret of life, he is delighted because he thinks he has become “greater than his nature will allow” (43); he enjoys having this “god like” ability. At first, he hesitates with his project of creating life, but he cannot control his desire for success so he begins to create a creature. He states, “I doubted at first whether I should attempt the creation of a being like myself … but my imagination was too exalted by my first success to permit me to doubt of my ability to give life to an animal as complex and wonderful as man” (42). Because Dr. Frankenstein is such a young scientist,…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays