Arguments Against Codification

Improved Essays
even where it produced results which were unfair or not in accordance with sound principle (c) that it might be uncertain how far it would be useful to refer to institutional writers and previous decisions and (d) that it would have been better to include various statutory offences frequently encountered in practice.

Some consider codification to be a requirement for a democratic state, and legislation to be a more appropriate forum for the creation and amendment of law than the courts and codification would have to enact the criminal common law in statutory form. The dependence on common law has allowed the courts to play a central role when responding to charges. This has enabled the courts to adapt existing offences to meet new forms
…show more content…
However, there is reason to believe that attitudes to codification are gradually becoming more favourable. Partly this may be due to the new emphasis on human rights. Professor Timothy Jones of the University of Wales, Swansea approved of codification in the abstract but considered that now, when human rights requirements were having a beneficial effect on the common law, was not the time to codify the criminal law of Scotland.
Codification is Scots law is a current debate amongst many professional at this moment in time but is unlikely to be applied until a decision can be made and when reacted factors such as how to apply codification would still need to reached. On this topic readings such as the Article for Scottish Criminal Law on CODIFICATION OF SCOTTISH CRIMINAL LAW by Eric Clive and the Scottish Law Commission draft criminal code should be referred to .

France is an example of civil law jurisdiction and the example of the specific crime that it be compared is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    By having these procedural laws in place, it supports Fuller’s inner morality views that human conduct does have a place in the legal system, which shows that his theory is parallel with thin law. By having a thin rule of law, the subjectivity of case-by-case situations to be reviewed is better implemented. Fuller does show a slight regard for thick law in this sense, as he aims to protect citizen rights. However this can be done with thin law, by having a proper judicial system govern a democracy and giving judges the ability to act under their discretion. Fuller alludes to the idea that a legal system should have subjectivity and that people should have control over their democracy, however, by having a proper baseline of proper procedural laws, it can allow a society to function in a normative and efficient…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jurisdiction of this case would be criminal as the case is brought…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although legislation is enacted by a majority, it must be constantly validated to ensure that it is fair. There are two justifications for this. First, the majority possibly enacts an unfair law. Second, while a law may have been deemed fair initially, governments and viewpoints are ever-changing. Time and again, people will experience a difference in belief and want to restructure pieces of legislation (Olsen).…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, traditional common law approaches still have relevance today, as the interpretation acts do not cover everything in relation to statutory interpretation. The two most relevant traditional common law approaches that are used in statutory interpretation are the literal approach and the golden rule…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another important complication to this area of the law arises when considering civil circumstances that may result in criminal sanctions. This is something that will also be considered in detail throughout this essay, and would cause me to argue that the law in this area is not clear and straightforward. In criminal cases the crown must prove the accused committed offence beyond reasonable doubt. In some cases there is a persuasive burden on accused, this discharged by proof on the balance of probabilities. This is the first demonstration of the crossover between the two standards that aim to be distinct and clear.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Masciantonio V. R Summary

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In McHugh J’s dissenting judgment in Masciantonio v R he argues that the characteristics of an ordinary person of the same age, race, culture and background as the accused should be implemented when applying the law of provocation preventing the likelihood of discrimination and injustice. Further, he goes on in saying that in a multicultural society such as Australia, the notion of an ordinary person is pure fiction and that cases heard by juries of predominantly Anglo-Saxon-Celtic origin would almost certainly result in the accused being judged by the standard of self-control of a middle class Australian of Anglo-Saxon-Celtic heritage. We explore the law of provocation and the requirements (tests) to satisfy the partial defence, changes to the tests over time and the difficulties that arise from the lack of understanding from the Australian Anglo-Saxon-Celtic origin judiciary, the standard of an ordinary person in Australia and difficulties of applying and also omitting the subjective characteristics of the accused. Firstly, for a murder charge to be reduced to manslaughter provocation must be established, whereby the accused is found to be sufficiently provoked by his victim (deceased).…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Legal systems can be dated back to the ancient peoples. There are many different legal systems that have evolved in other parts of the world. There are two types of legal system, the secular and religious legal system. It is argued that the Australian legal system is radically different to other legal systems. This, however, is not the case through findings and comparison with the Madayin legal system and Talmudic Jewish legal system.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Review: The Common Place of Law The Common Place of Law is an interesting empirical research of legal consciousness that is actually a very strong logical theory, in which law is recognized as both constituting and being constituted by social relations and cultural practice. The question that Ewick and Silbey spawn their theory from comes from the classic question, “how is the law experienced” rather than “what is the law,” this was a very compellingly argument made by Ewick and Silbey. The latter question that I saw arise from their argument was from where did most of the classic legal theory and jurisprudence; and did they spring from the subset question “how is the law experienced”. Seeing that law is not something that only exist and can be studied, but law is created by the process of inquiry and definition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Although criminal justice requires the correct label to be attached to the defendant’s misconduct, the wide scope of behaviour covered by the Homicide Act 1957 often results in the unfair, and thus harsh, labelling of offenders. This essay will sought to prove that the law of homicide is often too harsh in its assignation of labels to those who cause the death of others, by concentrating on the examples of murder with oblique intent, involuntary manslaughter and the partial defence of infanticide. It will conclude by determining the extent to which the existing law assigns the correct labels to those who commit a homicide, and whether there is thus a need for reform within the law.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Once you have chosen a case, begin conducting your research. Your research should cover the following details: 1 The individual or group that had their rights infringed—who were they? Olaf Dietrich had his rights infringed. 2 Which right(s) was infringed? How was the right(s) infringed?…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Human Rights Act (HRA) is argued to be a fundamental instrument in the United Kingdom’s (UK) constitution. It allows the rights and freedoms of the individual to be protected from the state within Domestic Courts. The Act has been under h scrutiny for decades surrounding the conflicts that it poses on the UK’s unwritten constitution and the fundamental doctrines of Parliamentary sovereignty, Separation of Powers and the Rule of Law. Due to this, there have been proposals made by many political parties over the years to abolish the HRA and replace it with a British Bill of Rights (BBOR). However, the Act has become entrenched in the UK’s legal system even prior to the enactment of HRA in 2000, highlighting the issues that would be posed…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    | | | |No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror | |Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. | |to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | | |Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random selection. | |random selection.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    No matter what law system each country may abide by they should come together to decrease crimes around the globe. New policies should be made to help decrease globalization and stop the international crimes. If our countries ca not works together international crimes will continue to rise and justice will not be served. References . Al-Azmeh, Aziz. 1988.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The criminal justice system is structured in such a way that the legal apparatus provides freedom to the judges to practice discretion. The legal apparatus used is based on the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act [1993] and the various amendments that have been made to streamline the law. The Irish Constitution of 1937 has been an instrumental force in the creation of court systems regarding the sentencing procedures. The provisions of the Criminal Justice Acts enable judges to determine the sentence alongside the guidelines of the law. Factors like the level of cooperation with the court procedures, the impact of the offences on the victims, the criminal history of the concerned individuals, and facts of the alleged offence.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will cover my individual perception on a variety of topics over criminal law. The questions being answered in this paper will be what are the purpose of laws, how does society impact this process, how are the laws constructed, how are the laws that are constructed defined, how does race, gender, and an individual’s socioeconomic status impact if a law gets passed and/or enforced and last, the paper will discuss if the factors just listed have changed or remained the same over time. When discussing the purpose of laws, the main focus will be on protection of individuals and crime prevention. The main purpose of laws, since the beginning of time, has always differed.…

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays