Argumentative Essay: The Controversy Of Organ Donation

Improved Essays
Every day the world grows in technological advances, some of the recent advances in technology are in Organ Transplantation and Donating. “Organ Donating is the process of surgically removing an organ or tissue from an organ donor and placing it into a recipient.” (Source: A) There are two forms of organ donating: live donations which are an organ that either has multiples of itself or can regenerate; or deceased donations which mean's when you pass your organs can be harvested to save the life of someone else. (Source: B) On average twenty-one, people die every day because they do not get the organ they need, while a new person is added to the waiting list for organs every twelve minutes. (Source: C) Although a majority of the American …show more content…
The harvesting of organs from a donor who did have a chance at life is considered a sin, since you are killing someone to harvest and save others. Although the intent is to save others, you know you are killing the donor, which is a sin. But, the harvesting of an organs like the kidneys while the donor is still alive is acceptable only if the donor is treated with care, has consented, and is not injured in the process.(Source: H) Also the catechism says, “The transplantation of organs from living donors is morally permissible when such a donation will not sacrifice or seriously impair any essential bodily function and the anticipated benefit to the recipient is proportionate to the harm done to the donor.”(CCC,30; Source: H) According to John Paul II, “the value of human life springs from what is spiritual in man….the body is capable of fulfillment in the knowledge and love of God.” The second thing he talks about is, what death really is, spiritually death is when the soul is not residing within the living person. Lastly, John Paul II puts strong emphasis on the fact that the donor must be really dead before the harvesting of the donors organs can happen. (pg.318-319 Source: I) The catechism also touches base on organ transplantation saying that “Organ donation after death is a noble and …show more content…
Both believe that it is acceptable if it is done after the death of the donor or if the donor and the recipient are both able to survive a live donation. Although the church has said organ donating is okay, many younger people are less likely to put themselves down as a donor because of the lack of trust they have in hospitals and medical professionals. The church and the world believe acts like illegally harvesting organs and harvesting organs without the consent of the next of kin or the donor is not acceptable. But, without organ donating doctors would not be able to save as many lives as the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Part A Usually to be able to be eligible for a heart transplant, possible recipients would: • Have to be in good health, besides from the heart failure • Have to be most likely to die without undergoing the transplant • Have to be able to handle the drug treatments and examinations that would follow on after the transplant • Have to be unsuitable for other therapies • Most likely be 70 or younger (Criteria in order from 1-5, 1 being the most important) 1. Most likely to die without undergoing transplant; I think this is the most important because of obvious reasons; they’ll die if they don’t receive the heart transplant. 2. Handle the treatments and examinations afterwards; if a person wasn’t able to handle the aftermath of the transplant…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Firstly, we must discuss what value rests on the idea and act of being an organ donor. Saunder’s makes the point of how, the act of donating an organ is “un-controversially, a morally laudable aim”. (3) This suggests that it is almost unanimous that, yes, donating an organ or perhaps multiple post-mortem to someone in need is something to be morally revered and celebrated. Saunder’s even suggests that there is an altruism that is…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the holidays they say it's better to give than to receive. I believe that to be true, It's good to be blessed, but its better to be a blessing. with this in mind , I believe the best gift to give isn't necessarily around any holiday, its one our own selves can give after death, the gift of life. It's called The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organ Donation Organ donation is a process where the organs of a person who is no longer living are given to those who are in critical condition and could die without them. Kevin Thurm, the author of the article "The Ultimate Gift: Sharing Life," works to persuade his audience of the positive effects of organ donation and why they should register to do so. Throughout his argument he uses the aids pathos, an emotional appeal, logos, a statistic-based appeal and ethos, a credibility-based appeal, in order to speak to a more vast audience. These appeals are widely shown throughout this article by the use of an emotional anecdote, startling statistics and credible sources. Through the use of these appeals, Thurm is working to persuade his audience…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION For this week, we examined Leslie Sharp’s Bodies, Commodities, & Biotechnologies and Nancy Scheper-Hughes’ The Tyranny of the Gift: Sacrificial Violence in Living Donor Transplants. While they can agree on certain facts, the two women take on different views of what it means to be a donor and what the consequences are for both the donor and the receiver. Sharp examines the emotional side of the donation, stating that there is a “selflessness embedded” (Sharp 2007: 3) in the act itself while Scheper-Hughes’ suggests it is a violent act where “pure altruism does not exist” (Scheper-Hughes 2007: 508). Their essays pose a multitude of questions: Does altruism exist?…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As many Canadians have noticed, on the back of their health card is the option to become a donor in case of death. Last year, according to the article, “A Perfect Market is Impossible” by Pedro García Otero; 123,000 people were waitlisted for organs in 2015. However, UNOS only received 30,000 donations. With that said, it is obvious that the demand for organs is much higher than the supply. Most of these organs needed are kidneys, because of this, a new idea has formed.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Certain cultural groups, such as some Orthodox Jews and Shintos have strong aversions to tampering with dead bodies. This is a challenge for the healthcare professionals as this may hinder the care of the patient. According to the 2010 survey by Fugate mentioned in the article Organ Donation after Circulatory Death (2011), there is a wide discrepancy between hospital on criteria for DCD and nearly half do not have a clear definition of what determines circulatory death (36). In Sharon’s case the time frame was sixty minutes with irreversible cardiopulmonary cessation for five minutes, however another hospital may be for ninety minutes with death occurring after a two minute cessation mark. There needs to be a further investigation to determine a standard definition of DCD criteria that can be used by all…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cross-culturally humans are characteristically treating their dead as if some part of the deceased is still present in the dead body. Also something characteristically human is to see the body and the self as connected to each other (Joralemon, 1995:347). In many cultures, such as the Hmong, separation between self and body is seen as the cause of sickness, called soul loss. According to Hmong belief, if the body is cut or if any parts are removed the body will be eternally imbalanced causing not only frequent illness but possible physical incompletion during the next incarnation. Removal of vital organs after death means that the soul cannot be reborn which means that both surgeries and autopsies are prohibited (Fadiman, 1997:33).…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people will not sign up to become an organ donor because they think it is a hard process, they don't know how it works, or they don't think it would be worth it. If a person is hospitalized, the medical staff provides the best possible care, regardless of organ donor status. Donation is considered after a patient has died. (become) Although there are risks with undergoing any surgery, most live donors do very well and have no physical ill effects or alterations in their own health.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the 21st century, organ donations and transplantations have made many major medical improvements. The organ donation process however, involves various difficult ethical issues. The biggest issue today is the shortage of organ donations (Butts & Rich, 2013). This issue has inspired ethical principles, debates, and medical improvements to resolve the supply and demand problem. The purpose of this paper will be to explore the ethical issues behind the organ allocation of two organ candidates in end stage liver disease presented in a case study of the work of Butts and Rich (2013).…

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organ donation is the process of surgically removing an organ from one human and transferring them to another human in order to save his or her life. In most cases, the only way to donate organs after death is if the donor is brain dead. Potential…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Statistics claim, “Every ten minutes another name is added onto the national organ transplant waiting list” (donatelife.net). In today’s society there is an issue that is often forgotten, and that is organ donation. Many people don’t often think about this problem due to the fact of many distractions such as current events, politics, personal matters, and many more. Although there are many reasons as to why this topic isn’t brought up often, doesn’t mean it should be brushed off the shoulder and set aside. Patients have to face life or death situations due to the lack of organ donations, and there are so many resolutions that can be made towards this issue.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Organ transplantation is one of the great advantages in modern medicine. Unfortunately, the amount of organ donors is much greater than the number of people who…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today alone 18 people will die waiting for an organ transplant. Just one person can save up to eight lives by being donors. Medicine and medical procedures can no longer save the terminally ill. Assuming that the patient chooses to donate their body to science, they can help others live even in their death. The choice should always be the patients, whether they are choosing to donate their organs or the manner of their death.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The advantages of euthanasia is helping some people from suffering illness to a person. The benefits are shared mainly by the family of the patient since it saves the health costs and reduces the financial burden on them. It would be a great strain for the friends and family to look after someone who is terminally ill so Euthanasia benefits in this way too. The truth we need to accept is that, the medical supplies being used on a terminally ill patient could be used for a patient who is more likely to recover sooner or later.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays