Argumentative Essay On Pro Felons

“Nearly six million American citizens who are denied the right to vote because of a criminal conviction” (Proquest). Many people believe felons have paid their price, while others believe criminals should not help elect the faint of the country, but what does the majority of Americans side on? In ancient times, Greece and Rome practiced of placing restrictions on convicted felons. This paper will examine the pro, con, and my viewpoint on felon rights on voting. First, the pro viewpoint is convicted felons have paid their debt to society. Some people believe restoring voting rights to ex-felons with strengthen communities. Firstly, getting felons involved with help strengthen the communities. For example, Andy Steiner reporter for Minnpost shares, the story of addict Rob Stewart believes “ granting voting rights to those leaving the state’s penal system will help level the …show more content…
Firstly, felons can't have a second chance when there's disenfranchisement happening. For example, Michael B, Mukasey a journalist for Wall Street reports, “felon disenfranchisement laws actually promote recidivism” (Mukasey). Thus, changing laws to make them more fair could change numbers in recidivism. Secondly, giving them more rights can help them get a second chance. For instance, Mukasey shares a recent study that shows, “Florida that showed lower recidivism rate for felons whose rights to vote have been restored than for those who're right had not”. Therefore, felons are willing to chance for their rights back. Thirdly, only felons who are willing to go through a long process tend to change more. To illustrate, Mukasey explains, that Florida system now requires felons to go through an application process to get their rights back. Hence, the felons who went through the application process are the felons who are working towards their rights. For all these reasons, there's still many things not being said about felons being able to