Explain The Five Proofs Of Aquinas

Superior Essays
Aquinas was a philosopher that used many arguments derived from Aristotle, however, Aquinas was unique in the way he approached the idea of an ethical life by combining arguments of reason with theology and God. Based on rational reasonings such as the four types of laws he defines and the precepts he draws from them, combined with faith in God, Aquinas believes that it is possible and just to judge another person’s actions, ethical character, and conception of life. Aquinas believes an ethical person will act in a certain way, which can be told from his actions, and his happiness will only come in the afterlife with God. Aquinas acknowledges that faith alone is not enough; one cannot judge another nor understand the world just …show more content…
Due to this, he developed five proofs to prove God, and thus make his arguments about faith, God, and eternal happiness be rational. His first proof is that everything in the world is in motion, constantly moving. However, an object in motion can’t cause motion so something must have started the first motion. This initial source is God. Since he is all-powerful, he does not move and rather just causes the motion. The second proof is everything has a cause and effect relationship in the world. If a person does one thing, it will cause a ripple of effects. Again, something must have been the first cause; something must have started this change. This first cause must have been God. The third proof is necessary existence. Things are constantly coming into existence and then perishing in an ongoing series. For this series to start though, it needs a starting point. Since God does not rely on anything else, he is able to start this sequence, thus bringing the first thing into existence, starting the cycle. The four proof is degrees of perfection. People live comparatively. They compare one experience to another with things being better or worse. However, they never experience an absolute since physical objects are always changing which thus prevents them from reaching an absolute. Yet, if people are comparing things to each other, there must be absolute somewhere. Aquinas argues that absolute good is God. The fifth and final proof of Aquinas is the cosmological argument. Everything in the world observed by senses has order, even nonconscious objects act in an orderly way. For this to happen, there must be something of equal or greater intelligence causing this cause and effect. It is impossible for people to be this cause because people are still learning about the universe and haven’t been around for much of universe. Aquinas then goes on to say that the only reason possible

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Edwards notes how air sustains human life and the forces of gravity sustain the air. He also states that “it is difficult to see” what sustains the forces of gravity or atoms or electrons. Edwards notes, supporters of Aquinas’ argument could point out gravity, atoms and electrons require a “cause in esse” because these things could not sustain or “cause themselves, since…they would in that event have had to exist before they began existing” However, Edwards argues, supporters of Aquinas’ argument would then assert the sustainer or cause of such things, namely God, needs no “cause in esse.” Edwards asserts that supporters of Aquinas’ argument fall prey to their own reasoning, meaning, they argue things require a “cause in esse,” except for when they get to providing a “cause in esse” for…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas believes that human law was placed in a position to trust God in the changes that society has created for itself. Aquinas sees the end result of human nature taken upon one’s own mistake and not following God’s way as a sin. “Sin usually harms its more direct victims, as well as the sinner herself, who…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas double-effect reasoning comes as moral questions treating the moral topics with nature of human action, action, virtues, vices, sins, grace and faith surrounding the analysis of self-defense in order of judging human action. Peter Knauer looks at double effect as the basis for every moral judgment. When you have a proportional reason for doing what you are doing then what might appear to be a direct killing because of the proportionate reason it becomes an indirect killing. Or what appears to be moral evil, if you have a proportionate reason for doing what your doing then it becomes a physical evil. Death row is an example of direct killing.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas: The First Way: Motion Since objects can not potentially move while they are actually in motion, they can not move themselves and must be moved by something else. That “something else” is known as God. The Second Way: Argument from Efficient Causes Everything effect that occurs is a result of a cause.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What steps does Descartes take to prove his existence and that God exists? (one of the proofs). Discuss whether his reasoning is sound and convincing. In this essay, I will discuss how after the first and second meditation, Descartes knows that he exists and that he is a thinking thing.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will outline two related skeptical arguments made by Montaigne, explicate them, and then provide Descartes response to these arguments, followed by a brief examination to determine which argument hold more persuasive power. I will begin by outlining two arguments presented by Montaigne, and then expand upon them to better explain their meaning and significance. The first argument I will discuss is the seventh argument presented by Montaigne in his work on skepticism, and proceeds as follows; “To judge appearances that we receive from subjects, we would need a judicatory instrument; to verify that instrument, we would need demonstration; to verify the demonstration, an instrument; here we are going round in a circle. Since the senses cannot…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before St. Thomas Aquinas gave an answer to the question whether God exists in things, he, in I.7, answered that God is limitless. The characteristic of limitless things is to exist with an unending amount everywhere in everything . Then he asks about God’s existence in things, I.8.1-4. He is trying to answer the questions: Is God in all things, Is God everywhere, Is God everywhere by essence, power, and presence, and Does it belong to God alone to be everywhere? These questions and their answers are a significant component of Aquinas’s understanding of the natural world.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In almost all of his responses to his student’s theories, he proves his student wrong. The student claims that the devil has full control over one’s choice of sinning and that an individual has no control whatsoever. The student’s theories are very convincing because he had evidence from works of other well-known people to support his statements. However, Aquinas, already aware…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Aquina used cosmological argument for the existence of God. Thomas believes the soul is known by acts. His ideas and beliefs are based on reasoning alone. Aquina states “the world of which we gain our knowledge is God’s creation”. He argues that is something has motion and move something must be outside it.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas states that some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are ordained. The strengths of all the arguments are that there cannot be a lot of causes to any one event. The concept is very simple, there needs to be more thought to whether God really does exist. As noted, there has to be some type of being created objects in order for them to exist in the universe.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In review of the three arguments related to the Proof for the Existence of a god, I found all three arguments to be very convincing, opinionating and interesting. These arguments appeared to be based on personal opinions, while convincing the reader to their beliefs from either a religious view, logical view or natural purpose view. The concept they all appeared to have in common was that they all believed god did exist, which I found to be very enlightening. My impression of each argument would be in the following comments.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our lives and where we end up in our afterlives are predestined. Aquinas disagreed with them. Aquinas believed humans have free will. God rewards us with heaven or punishes us with hell depending on the choices that we are free to make. If God predestined someone to go straight to hell and if that was out of their control that in Aquinas’s eyes would make God…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument from Degrees and Perfection Fifth Way ? The Argument from Intelligent Design. Aquinas concluded that common sense observation tells us that no object creates itself. In other words, some previous object had to create it. Aquinas believed that ultimately there must have been an UNCAUSED FIRST CAUSE (GOD) who began the chain of existence for all things.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas’s sees his conclusion as being correct with a reflection back to his premises because God is the reason that the world is intelligent. How else can these things be possible and have purpose behind them if they aren’t being guided by someone who has structure. In quote, he states “There therefore is some intelligence which directs everything in nature towards an end, and this we call God” (PBF 44). Aquinas is basically saying overall that nothing just ends by chance, but by someone that is necessarily able to end it, which is his God. As Aquinas states within his fourth reason, he says “therefore there is something which is the cause of being, of goodness, and of whatever other perfection that there may be in things (PBF 44).…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays