Government Intervention In The Economy

Better Essays
The source states that if there were any kind of government intervention in the economy, the strangling of innovation and self-reliance would take away the widespread prosperity only a free-market economy can provide. This opinion directly corresponds to the ideology of capitalism, the economic aspect of classical liberalism. Capitalism supports many values that are commonly associated with modern-day western economies. One such value, laissez faire economics, professes a government free economy. Therefore, the government is not welcome in interfering with the economy. A second value that is associated with capitalism would be the idea of private property. Private property means that someone owns something, and no one can take it away from …show more content…
The speaker of the source would also be opposed to socialist values interfering with the economy and private property by taxing the rich to provide for the poor, in addition to providing any sort of social program to help those who can’t help themselves. Unrestrained capitalism, as the source advocates, should not be embraced by society. In fact, the economy should have enough government intervention that while wide-spread success is achieved, independence and innovation are not sacrificed in the process. This idea can be supported through many examples and case studies. Three ideas , however, accurately sum up the benefits of having intervention in the economy: some closure of the gap between societal income classes, innovation is still accomplished, and, most of all, the people who participate in a government regulated system will experience a widespread area of prosperity in not only the economy, but in their everyday lives as …show more content…
The best example of this is during the industrial revolution. Robert Owen decided to experiment with providing good wages, recreational time, as well as a proper housing situation to a group of people during the industrial revolution. He named the town of his experiment New Lanark. In New Lanark, Robert Owen owned the factory where everyone worked, but contrary to what other factory owners did, he paid everyone according to the work they did, allowed them to have a certain number of work hours and recreational hours, and allowed them to do activities at a recreational centre in their down time. In essence, Robert Owen, as a governing body in New Lanark, intervened in both the economy and society to provide better lives for the people of the little town. In this case, Owen intervened heavily in the economy and society of his little town. But unlike what the capitalists thought would happen, the people were very productive and were, for the most part, reliant on them for what they did and did not do. Owen’s experiment of intervention in society by a governing body provided the proof needed for the idea that independence and prosperity could be widespread if there was a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Effects of Goverment Intervention Within Economy Source one is a direct quote from Milton Friedman illustrating his perspective and opinion on the market economy. Within the quote, Friedman is directly voicing his belief that the only logical way for an economy to be ran is through means of private ownership and investment. In his mind, interference from the government only disables the everyday consumer from living in what he thinks should be a free society. Within his quote he states, “Nobody spends somebody else’s money as carefully as he spends his own. Nobody uses somebody else’s resources as carefully as he uses his own.” With this statement, Friedman is implying that the government has no right to dictate how consumer’s money and…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nonetheless, a government’s task should be anything but these. The law of demand and supply regulate prices, previously established regulations control and restrict companies not tailored decrees to particular corporations for fear of monopoly and abuse; the market will autonomously govern that. If the market determines to make a company profitable or another one fail, then it must inherently be a good thing for everyone. As Hawkins puts it, “Under capitalism, the market reacts almost like a living thing and allocates resources where people want to spend their money.” (Hawkins). On that account, the market needs to be off-limits to the government for true capitalism to exist.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Business owners are allowed to be innovative and develop new products without the government interfering. According to James Doti, “Not only do I believe that self-interest benefits society, but I also contend that it is the only efficient way goods can be produced and distributed in a modern economic system” p. 7. When competition is created between consumers there is no monopoly on the market causing more goods and services to be available or produced. The only concern with a free market economy are market failures. The consequences of a market failure can be severe and have a major impact on an economic…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion. They are right as well because capitalism focuses on personal freedom and supports opportunities for equalization in capitalist countries; anyone can trade and produce with enough capital accumulation. Furthermore, private law and individual rights are in the foreground. On the one hand, I agree with Marx that communism brings a cosmopolitan production and consumption character to exploit the world market. On the other hand, I want to emphasize that the criticism of capitalism doesn`t mean that communism has to be offered.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Leonard Reed was an economist against socialism because he believed “the absence of governmental or any other coercive master-minding—then one will possess an absolutely essential ingredient for freedom: a faith in free people” as said in his piece I, Pencil. The negative aspect of socialism that Reed is addressing is the hindrance of individual’s freedoms. On the other hand, a positive aspect of socialism is the equality it creates for the people in the society. Overall my thoughts on socialism are, that this economic system will not flourish as well as a capitalistic due to the regulations imposed on by the government but it will have greater stability because a majority of the economic power is in the government. As a whole, socialism can be viewed positively or negatively due to its different…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Industry Coercion Analysis

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Well, What about Industry Coercion? A common discussion within the political community is whether or not the state should have a role in its economy. Friedrich Hayek, a distinguished political philosopher, believes that free market capitalism is the most viable option as an economic system for a free society. He believes this due to the fact that it is possible for the state to be a coercive agent, which inhibits the most basic of human rights: freedom. Because of this, he does not think the state should interfere in economic processes.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    High liberals may claim that any system with thick economic liberty has potential problems, such as market failure or exploitation of workers. However, market democracy still provides for governmental regulation to step in when market failure occurs. Even though market democracy allows for smaller governmental bodies than most high liberals are probably comfortable with, market democracy recognizes the need for “basic protection” for “highly valued” facets of society, such as governmental intervention if workers’ hours become too long or strenuous. On the other side, libertarians may claim that any system with governmental regulation infringes on paramount economic liberty. However, market democracy’s use of regulation does not infringe on personal economic liberty; rather, it asserts that…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In addition, both political practices promote the idea of limited regulation, as it hinders individuals from obtaining monetary success. During the emergence of neoliberalism, influential liberals such as Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises took the ideas of classical liberalism as a way to further express neoliberalism. In Hayek's Road to Serfdom, he proclaimed that centralized planning, also referred to as government intervention, is coercive power that limited the individual of obtaining economic prosperity (42). Furthermore, he noted that a planned government would never produce as much economic output, freedom, and happiness as a free economic system (57). Although Hayek opposed the idea of government intervention, he ultimately discarded the classical liberal idea of free market or laissez faire economics, stating that “the liberal argument does not advocate leaving things just as they are” (Hayek 37).…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Friedman and Social Responsibility of Business Introduction Milton Friedman believed and argued that business people take care of the responsibilities that affect them in their day to day life. However, they don't care the impact their businesses have on the society so long as their market is growing and increasing their profits. The main reason why he argued this is because believing in a reduced impact that the government has and a free-market. He found that government solutions to problems are no better because its solutions are even worse than the problem itself. As a result of his belief, he believed that the government should keep off the businesses activities because of its greed and the quest of people to have access to power.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peet and Hartwick (2009) outlined the major counter arguments in their work. First, free market is nothing spontaneous but constant social and institutional constructions. In another word, free market is never free from government intervention. Second, neoliberalism has been idealistic in human voluntary observance of social laws, as competition may drive individuals to evil extremes for self-interest. Third, price system hides more content of commodity production rather than reveal its true worth, e.g.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics