Anarchic International Politics

Superior Essays
1. Introduction
The issue of anarchic system in international politics is a crucial motive to define the interstates relationship between major theories of international relations. That is, there are diverse theoretical approaches to explicate how actors with a dilemma will behave or react between confrontation and cooperation in the decentralised world, thus understanding major theories such as realism and liberalism would be helpful to size up all possibilities of theoretical alternative in order to surpass anarchy in international politics. The concept of anarchic system, however, should be also examined in underlying perspective for international society prior to understanding the theoretical frames, because the essence of anarchy in the
…show more content…
It means that understanding of anarchic system would be in all beginnings to deal with global issues. She has also borrowed some ideas from notable scholars in this field to stress the gravity of anarchy for explaining the world politics. In her writing, prominent theorists, such as Kenneth Waltz and Robert Keohane who suggested each different approach to see international relations, have pointed out that the essence of anarchic system could be explicated by game theories, for example, the Stag game and the Prison’s Dilemma. The more important thing here is that their analyses of anarchy’s characteristic are in line with enduring pursuit of either national or common …show more content…
That is to say, synchronization to the concept and stability of hegemony depending on global norms or institutions should be needed (Cox 1981). Further, with a section 2 in Donnelly’s model, the United Nation Security Council, which is an unprecedented form of global governance as an oligarchic superordinate system since the end of the Cold War, would be an actual hierarchic model in anarchy. Hereby, hierarchy in anarchy could be found in our mind with acceptance of converted views, not only depending on cosmetic

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Interdependence Theory

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The international arena is full of rapid change, challenges, and uncertainty. Scholar use theoretical tools to further understand global politics. The most prominent theory driven tools used today are Realism and Liberalism. These two theories vary in definition and people ascribe to them as ways of viewing the world, predicting the future of events and furthering their understanding of state behavior. Two great books that exemplify such theories are “The Tragedy of Great Powers” by John J. Mearsheimer and “Power and Interdependence” by Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye Jr.…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: The Neorealist theory Kenneth Waltz in his book «Theory of International Politics» introduced the idea of neorealist theory. The theory can determine a state behavior and state interaction by using the structure. This structure is defined by the complex of some principles of the international system such as anarchy and the states' capabilities. Not only military power and the ability to use it with regard to other states are significant in the neorealism theory but also the combination of states' capabilities is one main part of this theory in International Relation. Undoubtedly, power is able to give too much to each state due to the fact that it can determine a position of the country on the international level.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The rising state will seek to alter the international system in ways that favor its interests. Other states must anticipate that, as a potential adversary 's power rises, so will its appetites. In other words, the other state must confront the possibility of direct challenges to their own core interests. The great strategic dilemma in this situation is to determine exactly how to respond to this ongoing power shift, so the states could ensure their survival. In fact, realist theory may provide the basis for a range of policy options; offensive realism and defensive realism are amongst them.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, Culture, religion, and civilizational fault lines are highly significant and capable of escalating interstate conflict. Each of those are important in regards to causes of interstate conflict. I agree with Huntington in that the major conflicts to come will arise from the clash of different civilizations. I believe that this clash will stem from interstate conflicts. Culture, religion, and civilizational fault lines are going to be contributing factors to interstate conflict.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If we live in a world where armed conflict, ideological rifts and possibility of aggression is around and remains, then realism will be a theory which will continue to be valid and used to interpret international politics, since one of its main assumption lies with military power, within a global system which is anarchy, where natural bitterness presents a slim possibility for both peace and cooperation. However, after the different wars which has occurred and ruined people’s lives there are more people against the concept of using military power to solve issues or having power. The bigger your army and the most nuclear power you have is the way you could get power and get people to fear you even though currently peace is more necessary. The way the world is currently set up realists can claim that international relations id about survival and competition for power because of the way we live, having countries fear you is a way of having power. The fact that we now have human rights laws suggests that military powers contradicts the laws which have been put in place to prevent history repeating itself…

    • 2126 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding today’s international order is a challenging mission since key actors and relations can influence the world in which we live. Throughout a changing environment, the rationale of state actors, combined with the behavior of non-state actors, willingly or unwillingly creates and modifies the international order because these actors want to change or modify the actual order. Therefore, international orders emerge through the establishment of organizing norms of power and stability throughout states, while the international order change due to the influence of many actors. According to John Ikenberry, international order is the system of activities and relations that enable the community of states to work through norms, agreements, and institutions in formal or informal…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Connolly and Mouffe consider their theories to be anti-universal. Mouffe’s dualist conception of political identities, sees identities emerging from the political – a name for the dimension of antagonism lurking beneath the formation of identities. By its nature, the political will assume many shapes and sizes to produce the identities. The political illustrates the pluralistic nature of politics and properly equips us to handle the movements that arise from it. The political is a stage upon which the us/them dynamic acts out its antagonism, forming a new synthesis.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism Vs Realism

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The similarities between the two main theories enable a less complex explanation of international relations. Both the Liberalism theory and the Realism theory share views on the anarchical structure of global politics, the rationality of human beings, and the importance of state actors. One of the main similarities between the two theories that affects the way that states should act, is how they see the world structure. In this anarchical world, states should find ways to survive. How the state itself will do that signifies a major difference between Realism and Liberalism.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam Essays 1. Beginning with a discussion of the levels of analysis of conflict, identify the main empirical factors that contribute to international conflict according to Quackenbush. Also, discuss how the political aspect of war (Gray and Clausewitz) interacts with these factors to produce volatility in the international system. Discuss two wars of your choice within this context, identifying how each empirical factor played a role as well as the political nature of the onset and termination of the wars. There are many levels or ways to classify war and international conflict.…

    • 2367 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brett's War Theory

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The many factors of this framework can all lead peoples and states to attempt indirect approaches to warfare as they test the new balances of power and the limits of national and trans-national influences, or begin to influence resources and activities on the global commons. The following case studies are a small sampling to illustrate the applicability of Hart’s and Corbett’s…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays