The Man Who Would Be King Analysis

Rudyard Kipling demonstrates a negative, disgusted view of imperialism in the British Empire. He uses his story, “The Man Who Would Be King,” to convey his message. This novella follows the story of two characters, Dravot and Carnehan, who set out on an adventure to Kafiristan with the goal of becoming kings there. Throughout this journey, Kipling’s dissatisfaction with the British empire is made known. The egotistical behavior of leaders, lack of ‘noblesse oblige,” and continued need for materialistic gain are just three of his main displeasures. Kipling illustrates this message through the parallels he has created between the empire that Dravot and Carnehan rule with the British Empire. Negative diction, a sarcastic tone, and irony are all used to aid in sharing his viewpoint as well.
The clearest point Kipling is attempting to express is the egotistical behavior of leaders in the British Empire. This is seen through the character, Dravot, from the very beginning of the story. When Peachey explains to Kipling that they are going away to be kings, Daniel adds the statement, “Kings in out own right,” as if it is only right that they be kings. It is an arrogant attitude to believe that he deserves to be king. A parallel can be drawn here to Kipling’s thoughts on British leaders as having the same attitude. Dravot’s sense of superiority …show more content…
By taking over different people groups and requiring that they adapt and assimilate to their ways, Dravot and Carnehan are practically saying that their ethnicity and culture is better than theirs. Daniel even said, “these men aren’t Indians; they’re English!... they’ve grown to be English.” Similarly, Kipling may be seeking to point out racial injustices as well in their policy of imperialism. He sees it as immoral to force other nations under their control and adopt a completely different way of life just because the British view their own lifestyle as being